Research Paper About School Lunches

They want students to eat healthy but at the same time eat what they like. when students go off campus researchers say they gain more weight then when they eat the food they like at school, healthy or not. If it’s not the healthiest food in the world then the lunches service can put less on the kids plate. Kids will eat more at school if the school sells what the kids like. FInally the school noticed it and finally started selly stir-fry stations.

Food is essential. It is clearly a necessity for life, and because of this, how we view our food is just as important as what it is that we are eating. Some say that ignorance is bliss and sometimes that may be true, but with knowledge comes wisdom. Therefore, knowing the risks of the things we eat, and what we may be able to change to adjust to healthier eating habits is information everyone should have, including parents and or legal guardians for their sakes, as well as their children’s. In her TED talk “What’s Wrong With School Lunches?”, Ann Cooper states in reference to the unhealthy lunches provided in most schools, “Unhealthy eating can lead to the following : high blood pressure, stroke, heart attack, cancer, insulin dependence, blindness,

Fast Food Items in Schools Some students hate lunch food and they would rather have some McDonalds or some Chick-Fil-A. Schools should offer fast food because students would actually eat well at lunch, students will learn how to be responsible, and the school will make money for selling the fast food. First, students would actually eat the food and not starve themselves because the food at lunch tastes really nasty. For example, in a school called the Holub Middle School, they serve “fried chicken” but once the students bite into the chicken, they get a mouth full of something else. The chicken is not even fried, the school receives its frozen and they just put it in the oven.

Sure many people such as Michelle Obama have tried to reform the school lunch menu, but the schools don’t seem to follow the regulations posted. The quality and nutrition of lunch at Lawton Community Schools, and many other schools, needs to be improved. With recent changes been made to the nutritional standards in school lunches, it seems that schools are increasing nutrition, but decreasing quality. “A recent USA Today investigation found that the nation’s largest fast-food chains have higher quality and safety standards for the meat … than what the U.S. Department of Agriculture has for the meat used for the National School Lunch Program...” (Buffenbarger). The food we serve our kids across the country has regulations, but all in the wrong places.

In the article “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough”,by McClatchy-Tribune News Service. The First Lady Michelle Obama’s Campaign to make school lunches healthier. One reason, that it is good to make school lunches healthier is that some parents are paying for unhealthy school lunches that their kids are eating. Another reason, that it is good to make school lunches healthier is that 1 in 3 kid are overweight or obese. The last reason, is that it is not good to make school lunches healthier because the government is ignoring parents and saying that parent can’t make the healthy choice for their children.

Also if you have a shorter lunch then you 're most likely to eat something fast like fast food or very quick unhealthy food. The national poll says that 3 out 5 kids feel rushed and 95% of those kids said that they would rather pick the fast unhealthy then a health meal. In summary, to improves efficiency in class, improves students moods, and improves students’ chances of not becoming obese we need to have 45-60 minute lunches. So that the 85 out of 100 student being rushed we become lower number and more student will get the food they need. Don’t you think that students deserve it and would be better in

True, they could bring lunch from home, but what happens if they forget or can make lunch to school. This problem needs to be solved. School is a place of learning, and what lunch time is teaching is that it is ok to eat unhealthy food. When I went to public school I was revolted by the disgusting food. The pizza was horrid, the chicken sandwiches were wet, and the salad tasted like dirt and not even good dirt, the dirt with dead thing underground.

Intro Name:Jayson lostaunau in the article pro/con:Are our school lunches healthy enough by McClatchy-tribute news service the genera is real problems.The article is about the first lady's choice in making school lunches healthier.the thesis is we could have healthy lunch but we could have something else that is not so healthy but can keep us eating lunch,because if the lunch is nasty then we won't eat and get sick from not eating.If we have something that we like then we won't get sick. TAG Brief Summary b Thesis(Reason 1, reason 2, reason 3) Body Paragraph 1 Name:Esmeralda Prieto In the article,it says that lunches are not healthy enough and that they need more healthy food in them.This shows that they want to put really healthy food but,really little of it.They need to put healthy and a little of unhealthy food to be full.Also sometimes when they cook the food it’s not always good or not fully cooked.In conclusion,they shouldn’t do the healthy food because nobody is going to want to eat it. Transition and topic sentence(stating reason 1) CD CM CM Concluding sentence Body Paragraph 2 Name: Tiffany Ramirez In the article “PRO/CON: Are our school lunches

The prices are not reasonable for the amount of food that you receive. Minimum wage jobs do not pay enough so a parent can do everything that they need to do. You will make enough money to pay for priority bills and whatever is left is what you will get. “Talk of parents who go hungry themselves so their children can eat , who put off utility and phone bills so they can buy food.” The government

While it is important that government support for school meals reduces economic hardship, increased efforts to also improve the nutrition among low-income children are still needed in the program. These efforts should be coupled with a broader focus on reducing empty calorie consumption and incentivizing healthy eating among low-income children. Often times, many lower income students will forego a healthier snack for a bag of chips and a soda. The school has a hand in perpetuation this issue by using funds for bulk goods that typically turn out to be snack foods or high calorie breakfast items.

Hook and topic sentence To Begin With, having Off-Campus lunch for middle school students has many benefits for students and teachers. Students will be able to focus because they ate. Teachers won’t have to always tell the students to pay attention in class because they got all of their energy out and students won’t be so hungry. In an article from DailyAmerican.com Tyler Sanners states, that “I believe that students should be able to leave school grounds for lunch only if they have transportation and parental consent.” Cafeteria food is expensive, and doesn’t fill your stomach. BryanHighNorseman.com states, that “ food is really expensive for the school.

The kids stomachs are desperate but not desperate enough to eat the school lunch.The Healthy slop makes stomachs quiver in fear. Michelle Obama has put into use the Hunger, Hunger free Kids Act, that will help feed kids from low income families with healthy lunches . Some people suggest that the new lunches are healthier with less salt and fat; however, they fail to recognize kids are disgusted by the food given to them and sometimes throw most of it away. Therefore, Parents should not agree with the new school lunch requirements Admittedly, some people think that kids are getting the required amount of nutrition. They also think this is a low cost way to feed their kids.