Rene Descartes’ is one of the most well-known philosophers and is very famous for his works. He was the youngest out of the three kids and was born in France on March 31, 1956 (Skirry 1). In his earlier years, he was raised by his grandmother along with his brother and sister. He began school at the Jesuit College of La Fleche at the age of ten and finished by the age of eighteen. According to Descartes’ “only the children of nobility attended the Jesuit College of La Fleche and that it was one of the best schools in the 17th century in Europe” (Rene 1). Soon after finishing school, Rene Descartes’ spent a lot of his time traveling the world. Once he finished his adventures, Descartes’ spent the rest of his life writing and studying philosophy. …show more content…
The meditator also explains how his senses have deceived him in the past, so he cannot fully count on them. After he explains how our senses can mislead us, he thinks about how in some situations that he is in, that he could not possibly doubt it. When he is “sitting by the fire, wearing a winter dressing-gown, holding a piece of paper in his hands, how could it be denied that these hands or this whole body are his” (Feinberg 242)? From this statement, he puts together his thoughts and realizes that there is no way that he can prove that he does not own his body. The meditator also becomes aware of the fact that his doubts of the ownership of his own self will be impractical. One of his most famous arguments is known as the Dream Argument. During his explanation of this argument, the meditator tries to identify the difference between imagination and knowledge. Descartes’ meditator often claims that “he is convinced that he is in his dressing-gown, sitting by the fire. When in fact, he is lying undressed in bed” (Feinberg 243). Not only has he had encounters of thinking that he was awake, but was actually asleep, he has also experienced himself believing that he was sleeping, but was indeed awake. The mediator becomes aware of the fact that he is awake by “looking at a piece of paper, shaking his head, stretching out and reaching for his hand deliberately …show more content…
He discovers that these statements can also be very difficult to find untrue. Even though he knows that this equation (2 + 5 = 7) is certain to be true, the meditator feels like it can be doubted. From what he is feeling, he believes that there is “a God that could have given him a nature such that he was deceived even in matters which seemed most evident” (Feinberg 249). This leads to him creating the Deceiving God Argument. He holds the deceiving God or the malicious demon responsible for everything he has ever doubted. At this time, he does not know for a fact if there is a God, so that is the next point he will try to prove. Even though Descartes’ meditator does not know if there is, in fact, a God or a deceiving God, he makes it clear that he will not let him bring down his emotions. He states: “let whoever can do so deceive me, he will never bring it about that I am nothing, so long as I continue to think I am something” (Feinberg 250). In other words, the meditator explains that he will never let anything unknown cause him to feel different about himself, let alone bring himself down. After what he believes to be a deceiving God evaluating him, he decides to “call all of his previous beliefs into doubt and classify any of his thoughts that will even come close to being doubted and identify them as being false” (Skirry 20). By making this decision,
This is one of the reasons why the Meditator was successful at proving God’s existence, considering that the Meditator would forge the pillars by his intellectual examination, until the Meditator would attain a clear and distinct idea of God. Moreover, the Meditator concludes that God does exist, because the idea of a perfect God was already inside the Meditator’s mind, which confirmed the concept of a perfect God as an innate idea that was left by God, so that the Meditator may remember the idea that was left behind. That is why I believe that Descartes succeeded in proving that God exists, taking into consideration that Descartes would not stray of the path that was based on pure logic, which is no easy task for any human being. Not only that, Descartes could not rely on the senses, because the senses do not provide enough information of the topic that he was discussing about, and the imagination would not have a correlation of the idea itself. Therefore, one could obtain numerous answers from the material world and the imagination, however, the credibility of both sources do not match the mind, which endeavors to find the truth of things by one’s intellectual
Thus, causing doubt because Descartes temporarily question his five senses, the rationalism of things, and God as a deceiver. Regardless of whether or not Descartes was being deceived by demons
While the process that led to his first absolute certainty regarding his existence was impressive, the fact that he proposed his existence as the key to God’s existence demolished the credibility of his argument (Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, p.70). For Descartes to exist, he believed that thoughts must come as a precondition. We understand that thoughts could only be able to process through a living organism. Before and right after the point at which his existence was proven as an absolute certainty, he had not confirmed that other living being could be capable of the same ability, thus if Descartes died then his thoughts would also being lost, his existence would be unproven and the very basis for the existence of God would be gone. The second problem with his argument lied within the cause and effect argument, in which there must exists a God whose presence encompassed everything.
In the First Meditation, Descartes tells us how many beliefs that he believed they were true, happen to be false as the time passed. For this reason, Descartes thought himself that one day he is going to sit down and think through all his beliefs, separate the false from the truth ones. From the truth beliefs, see if I have anything in doubt about them, and if so, I am just going to throw them out of the window as a whole, until I will find one thing, that simply I have no doubt about, Descartes says. Thinking of existence, he takes as an example his own body, in the dream argument and asks how many times we dream about real things, and they are so real so I may find myself sitting in a very particular place, wearing the same as in real life that I have had no doubt that the dream was the actual real life of mine.
Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.
Descartes then attempts to define what he is. He previously believed that he had a spirit and body, by methods for which he was fed, moved, could sense, absorb space, had a distinct area and think. Each one of those methods are thrown into uncertainty except thinking. Since he can think, he should exist. He thinks about whether he no longer exists once his reasoning comes to a halt.
The next step that Descartes uses in the second meditation is the existence of this Godly figure. He questions his own beliefs with that of the God, and argues that a mind should be capable of thinking for them to be of existence, “Is there not some God, or some other being by whatever name we call it, which puts these reflections into my mind? That is not necessary, for is it not possible that I am capable of producing them myself?” He then puts forward that for one to be deceived by this “evil demon” as he describes it, they have to exist to be deceived.
Descartes also formulates another argument of doubt but uses God as his object of deception instead of dreaming. He first states that we believe that there is an all-powerful God who has created us, redundant. Descartes goes on to say, that God has it in His power to make us be deceived even about matters of mathematical knowledge which we seem to understand clearly. Descartes does acknowledge his argument is controversial and brings up objections to support his argument. Some might believe God wouldn’t deceive us.
Descartes makes the Evil Demon argument to neither prove the existence of such a demon or construct a better understanding of this source of deceit. But rather to destroy the foundations in which he has built all his bias on and rebuild his knowledge from scratch. It works to make us speculate everything while doubting the beliefs and senses we hold so true. This never-ending doubt gives rise to a new question, how do I know that
Notre Dame ID: 902008117 In René Descartes ' Mediations on First Philosophy, Descartes abandons all previous notions or things that he holds to be true and attempts to reason through his beliefs to find the things that he can truly know without a doubt. In his first two meditations Descartes comes to the conclusion that all that he can truly know is that he exists, and that he is a thinking being. In his third meditation, Descartes concludes that he came to know his existence, and the fact that he is a thinking being, from his clear and distinct perception of these two facts. Descartes then argues that if his clear and distinct perception would turn out to be false, then his clear and distinct perception that he was a thinking being would not have been enough to make him certain of it (Blanchette).
First, he cancelled out the senses as a factual source of existence since the senses can deceive him into thinking he exists when in reality he could be just be dreaming, because the senses play a large role in dreams and we can touch, taste, smell, hear, and see our dreams. Then he eliminated the fact that his body, the sky, the earth, mainly the physical things in life, proves his existence due to the fact that they could be objects of deception by some Malicious Demon. Finally he concluded that if he is having these thoughts that he may be being deceived then he does exist for he has a mind and a thought process and he doesn’t need physical confirmation of his existence due to his mental
However since we already have an idea of God as this perfect and infinite being, he must exist. Furthermore, since the natural light clears deception as an imperfection as well as not existing, God is a non-deceiver, he exist and is perfect. After the cogito argument and natural light examination of the deceptive God, Descartes discards the hypothesis that God is a deceiver. Since God is all-good, he would not deceive us. For that reason, Descartes introduces the evil demon/genius instead.
Their many arguments and critiques that are in each of the parts of the Meditations. The sixth part of the Meditations about the how the mind and the body are connected to each other. He starts by talk about how to think the body and how it works. He explained that the body is meditator or extension of the information and the body well by the one that goes through
He argued that animals didn’t think or feel because they had no soul. Because of this belief, he performed vivisections He also described blood circulation but came to an interesting, but wrong, conclusion that heat in the heart expands the veins, causing its expulsion into the veins and arteries. Descartes’ report about all this, L’Homme, et un traité de la formation du foetus (Man, and a Treatise on the Formation of the Foetus), was published in 1664. He is dubbed the father of modern western philosophy and the one who coined the phrase: “I think therefore I