Professor Ross
Government 2306
8 February 2015
Is Abstinence-only education the correct approach for Texas? Owning one of the highest rates of teen pregnancies in the Union, Texas has an abstinence only approach in sexual education to try to reduce pregnancies? In addition to this, Texas ranks first as being the top spender in sexual education, but can’t get solidified results out of its spending. Texas doesn’t teach anything about contraception, how the Texas Department of State Health Services has said that the mission of the program is to delay sexual actions among teenagers until they are old enough, and the use of abstinence only education to protect children from explicit content only to find out in their own way leads to curiosity
…show more content…
Abstinence is an extreme way of preventing sexual consequences. It’s easy for an adult to tell a teen to abstain from sex but that teen has outside factors trying to convince them to go against such teachings and they eventually engage in a sexual act unprotected because they were taught to abstain and not protect, leading to either a disease or pregnancy. As the old saying goes “Curiosity killed the cat.” So instead of Texas’ teens learning the hard way of their actions and potentially making a dire mistake, why not teach them to be safe with their actions, it makes more sense and holds more positive results. Teens nowadays are more progressive thinking than the generations before us. It’s now more common for sex to be a topic of conversation then it was forty plus years ago and teens are more open to talk about sex than past generations. “Texas lawmakers are still way out of step with common sense and public opinion. Some even argue that sex education gets teens so “hot and bothered” that they can’t wait to jump in the sack with each other. Check The Numbers”. People don’t like being told what do especially teens who feel they are treated like they don’t know a thing and are expected to act like adult but at the same time are treated like they aren’t intelligent and as if they were motivated by constant deviant thoughts. These different views between the generations developed an almost hostile relationship with the new Texas teens and the constantly reelected elitist right wing politicians who seem to forget the separation between church and
It is also important that we provide accurate and proven sexual classes to our students. More than 80% of Americans believe that a form of sexual education should be taught in schools.5 The majority of these people believe that this education should be focused on various forms of birth control. Currently the federal government provides funds for these evidence-based types of education through the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative and the Personal Responsibility Education Program. I will support programs that seek to expand funding for programs that teach a variety of birth control methods
Emma Elliott, a writer for the Concerned Women for America organization, compiled a pamphlet in 2005 in support of an abstinence-only based sexual education system. Elliott establishes her argument in a unique countering organization. She presents a popular claim about sexual education and then refutes it with a reason supporting abstinence. In general, she includes eight mainstream beliefs. The first one is rather general where she refutes that “Abstinence education doesn't work”, and she continues to say that is does and backs up her argument with multiple studies, such as the program “Best Friends” caused 80% less possibility of sexual activity.
Linda Lowen writes about both sides of the abstinence education debate in her article “10 Arguments for Abstinence - Pros and Cons of the Abstinence Debate.” Ms. Lowen has discussed each side thoroughly before moving from one topic to the next and presents herself as unbiased for most of her article. She briefly states her stance about contraceptive after discussing the data for a logical solution. Throughout her paper she uses logic and statistics as a baseline for the issues while building upon them with other rhetorical strategies for an unbiased and compromisable approach to sexual education.
The irony I usually witness is that those against it, square measure the everyday obsessional bodybuilders that may claim "your killing your gains" not consumption, solely to induce up within the morning Associate in Nursingd do an hours fasted cardio to "target fat". So is Intermittent abstinence extremely dangerous for you? can you lose your gains? Or will it 's used as another tool to succeed in your goals? I am not for Intermitent abstinence, or against it, square measure there times that you simply may use it?âEUR¦YESâEUR¦are there times it mustn 't be usedâEUR¦by this I mean, square measure there times that it not best to use itâEUR¦YES.
In today’s modern society, sex education is seen as one of the seven plagues of Egypt. Let’s face reality, kids as young as 10 years old are having sex. According to the public health data, the chlamydia rate among teenagers have sky rocked by 80 per cent in the past two decades. Is this the result of ignorance or the lack of knowledge? In the article “The Sex Ed Revolution: a portrait of the powerful political bloc that’s waging war on Queen’s Park” by Nicholas Hune-Brown, published in Toronto Life magazine on September, 3, 2015 parents are opposed to the new sex education curriculum for various reasons.
Generational Attitude Changes About Sex "Changing Attitudes about Sex" an article from Obesity, Fitness, & Wellness Week (2015), informs the reader that the growing acceptance for same-sex sexual relations, premarital sex, and a greater number of sexual partners is due to the growing inevitable need for individualism in younger generations. From the trivial topic of mandatory uniforms in school to the foremost political debate over same-sex marriage the controversial word that unites the topics is individualism. Most people feel as if they have the freedom to be themselves in every aspect of everything they do. People express themselves and communicate to others not only through what they say but as well as what they wear and how they carry themselves. Ranging from the people born in the 1900 's to people born as late as 1990 's as each generation grows so does the acceptance for premarital sex, multiple sexual partners, and same-sex
Amy Schaltes effortlessly argues that sex, one of life’s most trivial issues, could be less difficult to handle if parents embraced their children’s natural maturation, instead of shying away from it. Schaltes’s “The Sleepover Question” is informative, and gets the audience thinking. Why is teen sex so controversial? Would talking about it remove the stigma from consensual teenage sex? Further, should the stigma be removed?
Government. The authors, Kathrin F. Stanger-Hall and David W. Hall, of “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S.” discuss how sex education is demonstrated throughout the U.S. and how the government may be a contributor to these alarming rates (2011). They state, “some argue that sex education that covers safe sexual practices, such as condom use, sends a mixed message to students and promotes sexual activity” in describing the U.S. Government’s standpoint on sex education (Stanger-Hall & Hall, 2011, p. 1). They strictly believe that abstinence-only education throughout schools is the answer. Abstinence is restraining one’s self from all forms of sexual activity and choosing to not participate in any sexual acts.
Preaching at a teen about how having sex is bad and all of the negative consequences, only leads some teens to want it more. We need to take the focus off of sex itself, and shift the focus
Abstinence-only educators seem to believe that if they shame and scare their students enough about sex, there will be less desire to do it. The issue with this is that the students will not be too scared to have sex, they will instead be too afraid to talk to their doctors and get protection. Going to the store to pick up condoms or making an appointment to get birth control is intimidating, and when young adults are told that they should feel ashamed about doing so, they will be less likely to go through with making those commitments, leaving them unprepared when they do choose to have sex. Unsurprisingly, teen pregnancies are significantly higher in states with abstinence-only
We still believe the myth that our “cherry” can be “popped” oh and speaking of, we still feel ashamed of saying the V word – vagina, and well, other related medical terms. We still find the idea of providing students with comprehensive sex ed a ridiculous one. Okay, now that I almost got to the point of my speech, I want to say for the record that remembering all these events was hard. But do you know what else is hard? Living in a sexualized society that exposes children at an early age to messages about sexuality that normalize and perpetuate ignorance and wrong information in regards to sex yet refuses to incorporate sex ed into our curriculum.
It concluded that Sweden’s more relaxed approach to sexual education resulted in a dramatic difference to the US. “The teenage birth rate in Sweden is 7 per 1,000 births, compared with 49 per 1,000 births in the United States.” This fact was even more impacting when I read that Sweden students were more tolerant towards premarital sexual relations. My results revealed a startling perception that I was unaware of.
The nature of the time period we are living in where pre-teens having access to phones and such, hearing something in school could prompt them to look it up on their phones later. I think it shouldn't be hard for a parent to talk about sexuality since even PG-rated movies that are hilarious to little kids, being seen by an adult who has matured would have likely noticed something that was sexual as in example some scenes in Toy Story. These teens are showing both Individual and Relational developmental changes mainly Relational. By mainly asking questions towards their genders sexuality norms to their parents. Based from the video and what I would suggest to parents who are having issues trying to think how they should talk to their kids about
Introduction 1. Attention Getter: The provision of sex education in schools has been a controversial subject matter among different education stakeholders ranging from parents to educators. A focus, however, on the prevalence of adolescents’ abortion, pregnancy, and HIV and AIDS rates indicates significantly high rates.
II. 1st paragraph: Studies done in the University of Georgia show the importance of sex education in a macro scale of just the US, but other research has been done on a micro scale in Memphis, Tennessee that other angles like economics must also be taken into account as to what the consequences are of no sex education or abstinence-only education. A. A