Tsang S. (2007) discussed that the whole Hong Kong became a colony of Britain in 1989 after the several negotiations between China and Britain. Britain wanted Hong Kong to be its colony owing to its proximity to China, where the British could make great profit. Hong Kong can be a ported to support the expansion of British trades and profit in China in order to support its imperial expansion. Corroll (2007) summarised that a consensus of hanging over the sovereignty from Britain to China was made in the 60s. And it took place on 1st July 1997, when Hong Kong was no longer a colony and China claimed that Hong Kong was home. Titmuss R. (1959) said that welfare is all collective interventions to meet certain needs of individual and or to …show more content…
At that period of time, Hong Kong was used as a free port for the trade in China only. Like the other colonies, the social needs of the people were neglected and the policies implemented were out of the benefit of the British government instead of the local interest. Local community and the charitable organisations were the major sources of welfare.
Xu (1993) analysis that the population growth in Kong Kong in 1841to 1941 was a mechanical increase. The population was mostly the new immigrants from the mainland China owing to the labour shortage for economic development in Hong Kong and the labour surplus in China. The Chinese rushed to Hong Kong not only to make a living but also in pursuit of more stable society in Hong Kong. The hygiene and housing problems followed because of the hilly landscape of Hong Kong, as well as the over-centralization of a population. The poor living environment and the lack of proper medical treatment were the reasons for the short life expectancy among the Chinese , which was recorded 18.33 in
…show more content…
Hong Kong had just become a colony of Britain. The British tried not to intervene any matter of the Chinese. Tang (1998) pointed that the colonial government adopted the approach of minimal state and hoped that the Hong Kong government could be self-sufficient. Public expenditure should be minimized just for the basics and administrations was little to meet the needs of the Chinese. It upheld the family value and advocated self-reliance so that government's resources and welfare should be used once no personal resources are not available. This was one of the ways for the government to reduce its cost in social welfare. Therefore, the Britain government can avoid any funding in its colonies. Xu (1993) described that mobility was one of the major characteristics of the population of Hong Kong. Without a sense of local identity, people, regardless of race and nationality, treated Hong Kong as a place to make money and they would probably return to their home countries after retirement. This characteristic made the colonial government to provide welfare for the people, as they were neither human resources for Hong Kong development nor worthy for long-term
Salutary neglect was a colonial policy in which England relaxed its enforcement of most regulations in return for the continued economic loyalty of the colonies. As long as raw materials kept flowing into the homeland and the colonists continued to buy English-produced goods, Parliament did not supervise the colonies closely. The colonists were able to influence the king-appointed governors, from the approval of laws to the appointment of judges, since the colonial-assembly paid the governors’ salaries and not the king. It was because of their influence with the governors that they were able to develop a taste for self-government that would eventually create the conditions for rebellion.
The acts Britain made were purposeful because it was effective for helping them pay off their debts from war. In a town meeting in the colonies, the leader declared that “the excessive Use of foreign Superfluities is the chief Cause of the present distressed State of this Town, as it is thereby drained of its Money” (2). The excessive amounts
Part 1 - Worksheet Overall Thesis Statement Great Brittan had raised taxes, we wanted a change in government, and our lifestyle. I will attempt to explain to you my political, social, and economic complaints with Great Brittan. I. Thesis of the first paragraph of the body (Political): 1. First piece of specific historical evidence that supports your thesis: The Tea Act of 1773 a. Explanation of how this evidence supports your thesis: Parliament was corrupt and taxing without representation.
By today 's standards the governments of the colonies were semi-democratic. Each colony had its own legislature of land owning males and a governor that was sent from britain. Each colony was able to create and enforce it’s own laws. However, the british government could change any rules if it did was strongly opposed to any rules that the colonies had. Despite the fact that the Colonies could make their own rules the did not control their financial system.
Agriculture was a major part of most Chinese people’s daily life and they were satisfied with their lives. Many people did not want to be influenced by industrialization and the western ways of Europeans. This did not matter to the Europeans however, as they wanted the silk, tea and porcelain that was only coming from China. According to Tao He’s article, British Imperialism in China,
The taxation by the crown caused a political problem between the American colonists and British authority. The colonist’s cry was “no taxation without representation!”, as they had been governing
When the 13 colonies were under the influence of the British monarchy, the colonists had the follow acts that would restrict their individual rights and would often have
Financial stability of the colonial people was often thought to be put at stake with the introduction of new taxes and regulations which caused much frustration. Before Parliament had laid out any questionable taxes (i.e. stamp act), the citizens appeared perfectly content with Parliament 's power (Doc C). The stamp act required that every document, used by the colonists be stamped and taxed. One can see why this would anger people (as paper was the “big thing” before modern technology). Chaos ensued, the colonists were not fond of tax collectors whatsoever.
Many Chinese died during that time. No Pain No Gain, they chose to have a possible to get a better life. " A number of them became entrepreneurs in their own right.
During the period between 1450 and 1750, European traders started to get more involved in Chinas and Japan's politics. One similarity between China and Japan in their relations with European traders is that in both countries european traders were welcomed at first, however the relationship soon turned sour. In China, the Qing dynasty sold limited trading privileges to European powers but confined them only to Guangzhou. The British was not satisfied with this arrangement, so they asked for more trading rights. As a result, In a letter to King George III Emperor Qianlong states that the chinese had no need for British products.
Their policies and methods of colonization were consistent in every region they conquered because of this fact. The British colonies were inconsistent because the they were controlled by both the king and stock companies, which meant that different colonies had different incentives to settle. This hybrid of authority in each region meant that the North American colonies cannot be studied thematically as a whole, rather they must be analyzed as individual cases. These differences were determined by the motivations to settle the colonies and what environment the people lived
When Britain ended salutary neglect, the colonists’ got mad. It was a major turning point in the history of America because it allowed Britain to gain control over all of the American colonies, and make laws and tax the people however they wanted to. This helped Britain get out of debt after the French and Indian War. Before Britain ended salutary neglect, colonists’ were allowed to do whatever they wanted to.
So they would have complete disregard for the people who currently lived there. The British soldiers would go into colonist’s homes and treat the current residents as their servants. The soldiers would eat their food, sleep in their beds, use their dishes, and in some cases, take their possessions. This happened in almost all of the colonies
Overpopulation Overpopulation is a condition that is undesirable. Overpopulation is one of the problems that people concern it to. One of the serious countries facing this problem is China. Reports in China show that it has about 1.4 billion people in this country; it takes about one over seven people of the world population. China is the third largest land after Russia and Canada in the world.
People only cared about their own profits. Kongyiji only was a person who didn’t find his social position,but people laughed at him, even a children despised him. The caste differentiation was the foundation of the feudalism, because of that, people didn’t have passion, sympathy, people was cold, indifferent, and