Our collective understanding of the French Revolution is deep and the historiography of the revolution is complex. Any student or historian seeking an understanding of the French Revolution and its contrasting perspectives faces a number of challenges. Despite the already portrayed contrasting views between the Marxist and the revisionist interpretation, presence of different interpretations does arise within the revisionist perspective as well. Taken upon the sources provided, it can be identified which sources confirm or discard Eisentein’s and/or Lucas’ interpretations of the preparatory stage of the French Revolution. Lucas focuses on the imposition of artificial barriers between nobles and non-nobles as a catalyst that brought latent …show more content…
Very few of the deputies of the Third Estate, who actually made the revolution, were merchants or manufacturers; most were lawyers or lower-level state or municipal officers. Having identified their essence of their arguments, it can be noted which sources correlate or provide evidence to each of these historians’ interpretations. Looking upon the cahiers as a collective work of body, it can be noted that they were not primarily voicings of the ideas on government prevalent in France at the time, but rather expressions of discontent with existing conditions. Thus the presence of a willingness to compromise is shown not so much by the proposals for new forms of government as by concessions to existing forms. Taking this into account, it should be highlighted that the anomalies in these collective cahiers play a higher relevance in accordance with these historian’s interpretations. As a collective the cahiers strengthen Lucas’ interpretation as they demonstrate the unwillingness of the First and Second Estate to relent their privileges. …show more content…
Starting with the former source, it can be identified that Mirabeau (add in full name afterwards) who is a noble has been denoted as the voice of people as he advocated for a constitutional monarchy. This signifies that the French Revolution was not a bourgeois revolution but rather a coalition of men from all the estates sharing homogenous beliefs. Moving on to the latter source, it can be identified from this that the account was demonstrated by Third Estate deputy that was not a merchant nor manufacturer but rather a lawyer. This signals, much to the contrary of the Marxist interpretation, that the Revolution was not led by a single-unified bourgeois group but rather a group with men of different
Roxanne fits more into the role of the “noble of the robe” because she was born into her high status and never makes any great contributions to society. Although their status was not as high as the church official’s of the First Estate, the nobility were still perceived as very important members of French society. They received admiration wherever they went, similar to the First Estate: “murmurs of admiration from the crowd: Roxanne had just appeared in her box” (Rostand 19). The crowds reaction to Roxanne’s entrance shows how highly perceived the Second Estate were in the 17th century. The Second Estate was a very diverse estate due to its subdivisions and each division was portrayed by Rostand with their class, actions, and effect on French
Paine also emphasizes that the Garde du Corps officer’s lack of principles, specifically prudence, caused him to kill “...one of the Paris militia.” In doing so, Paine underscores the Third Estate’s lack of principles and morals and their overall corruption and belief that working-class lives were
He argues that this gave the elite many benefits including allowing them to replace the British royals, while only giving minimal benefits to small landowners, and leaving the lower class more or less
Tackett, therefore, used the example of Jean-Baptiste Sauce as an underpinning to his argument that the average person can and has altered the very course of political and social history. In this instance, the innkeeper’s actions led to the death of the monarchy in France, for the time being, and to the eventual solidification of Republican leanings in Revolutionary France. In turn, these notions led to the establishment of the First French Republic. Thus, Tackett’s depiction of the actions of Jean-Baptiste Sauce worked as an effective method for proving his
The French Revolution occurred due to the curtailing of the estates’ rights under King Louis XIV, who attempted to rule as an absolute autocrat and was later executed for this. The Enlightenment made it permissible for people to speak and question the rights of the time. After the Enlightenment, social rights, religious rights, and gender rights were expanded and advanced. Document one speaks of natural rights that extends to all of humanity with natural rights being any right that doesn’t hurt another, “You have the most sacred natural right to everything that is not disputed by the rest of the species.” By being a natural right, it couldn’t be denied to anyone, no matter gender, race, or time period.
The causes of the American and French Revolutions have several parallels as well as a few differences.
The French Revolution that took place between 1789 and 1799 changed France and Europe forever. In 1799 Napoleon Bonaparte came to power, ruling until 1815, as essentially a dictator. The Revolutionary goals were much influenced by the ideas of the Enlightenment. The political goals of the revolution focused on the necessity to have a constitutional government. The economic and social objectives of the revolution were mainly about equality under the law and an end to the old aristocratic order.
During the Eighteenth Century, France had an absolute monarchy with Louis XVI as king and Marie Antoinette as queen. In that time period, French society was based upon a system of Estates where the clergy made up the First Estate; the nobility comprised the Second Estate, and everyone else including professionals, peasants, and the bourgeoisie made up the Third Estate. The Third Estate was immensely unhappy with the old regime, the Estates General, and Louis XVI’s leadership. France was also in the midst of a fiscal crisis due to the American Revolution, Louis XVI’s lavish lifestyle, the Seven Years War, and the tax exemption of the First and Second Estate. Following the surge of new ideas and impactful philosophers from the Enlightenment,
Nobles lost their advantaged position in French society causing, among other things, loss of life, a perceived forced emigration to other lands, loss of property, and the end of seigneurial rights and income. Some of these advantages were subsequently recovered during Emperor Napoleon’s reign but many pre-Revolutionary rights were forever
Opening paragraph The French Revolution was a major failure and a minor success. After all of the blood shed, the laws, civil rights, and codes did not get instituted effectively and did not represent the values that the citizens had fought for. Examples of this were the Napoleonic Code and Declaration of Rights of Man. Another reason it was a failure was because during the revolts and reforms more than 40,000 men and women died.
In this paper I discuss the four phases of the French revolution and how they influenced one and other, these phases consist of The National assembly/ The Constitutional Monarchy, The Reign of Terror, The Directory, and the Age of Napoleon. The First phase of the French revolution is the National assembly or Constitutional Monarchy. " Constitutional monarchy, system of government in which a monarch shares power with a constitutionally organized government.
“Qu 'est-ce que le tiers état”/ “What Is the Third Estate” by Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes was one of the French Revolution’s most momentous and prominent political texts, shaping the course of events in 1789. It is a pamphlet structured around three hypothetical questions and Sieyes responses. These questions are: What is the third estate? Everything.
In The Family Romance of the French Revolution, Lynn Hunt examines the significance of the family and politics in relation to the French Revolution. Looking at ideas of romance that transferred over into family life, Hunt is able to investigate a shift in ideology that played a part in precipitating the French Revolution. Lynn Hunt attempts to make an intervention in the historical literature of the cultural history of the French Revolution. Lynn Hunt is a historian of the French Revolution and Professor of History at University of California at Los Angeles. More broadly, Hunt is interested in the changing of ideas and political spheres in 18th century Europe.
This essay will examine the historical accuracy of the film Les Miserables in terms of the social, economic and political conditions in French society post French Revolution. The film Les Miserables depicts an extremely interesting time in French history (from about 1815-1832.) Even though the story line does not depict every detail and event that occurred during the time period as well as the fact that some aspects are dramatized for entertainment purposes, the film effectively spans thirty years of economic, political and social aspects of French Society. However it also manages to bring in references to the past, the French Revolution (1789-1799) and the impact it had on the society portrayed in the film.
These two occurrences demonstrate that Napoleon has turned into a despot. Until present time, had been small changes in the principles of constitution or at least hidden with wise lectures, however those days are over. Evidently Napoleon is now believed that he has enough power to neglect the original principles of a communist society. A class-structure is currently again strictly set up: “The essential history of the introduction of class, as a word which would supersede older names for social divisions, relates to the increasing consciousness that social position is made rather than merely inherited” (Williams.1984 . 61). Napoleon supposes he belongs to another class, considering himself above not just the "common animals" who had been