ipl-logo

Revolution Dbq

979 Words4 Pages

In 2011 many countries in the Middle East rose up and revolted against their oppressive authoritarian leaders. The citizens in these countries wanted the rights and freedoms they had been denied when the dictators were in power. The governments in these countries had far too much power and the there was nothing to keep them from abusing their power. When the citizens had far too few rights and there were laws in place to keep them from doing anything about it. In Egypt the government could and would kill people in the streets and arrest people without reason in order to keep the people from having too much freedom. The people were afraid of the government because there was always a chance that the government could attack them, beat them, …show more content…

The people were tired of the government having unlimited power and being able to abuse the citizens to keep them loyal and law abiding. They believe that the people in …show more content…

Both countries did not have the same outcome though. In order to analyze the outcomes of both country’s revolutions one would first have to define what a successful revolution is. The dictionary defines a revolution as a “radical and pervasive change in society and the social structure, especially one made suddenly and often accompanied by violence.” But, really a successful revolution is one where a change is made in the right direction, meaning that things get better in the eyes of the people, and one where the goal or change that citizens of a country want to occur, doe is fact occur and they people are satisfied with the results. Libya had a successful revolution based on that description. There is still violence and there are many people taking advantage of the weak and ineffective police system (Document M). But, the democracy they established is still intact and the people have more freedoms and rights, which was the goal of the revolution, to take out Gaddafi, the former dictator of Libya, and establish a democracy with a constitution. Libya’s constitution protects the rights of the people and keeps the government from attacking them. The people of Libya have everything they wanted, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom to protest, and most importantly elected leaders by the

Show More
Related

  • Glorious Revolution Dbq Analysis

    672 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the changes seen in the economy, war & leaders, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 can be considered a part of the Enlightenment. Evidence shown through historical documents proves this stance. Although some historical events during the Glorious Revolution refute my stance, the Glorious Revolution was indeed a part of the Enlightenment because of the major shifts England had during and after this time period: Influencers, Religious tolerance and changes in governmental policies. Stated in the English Bill of Rights which were passed by Parliament and ratified by William III-King of England. “That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by royal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal”(Doc.3)

    Read More

  • Revolution Of 1800 Dbq

    163 Words  | 1 Pages

    As previously mentioned, Thomas Jefferson would go on to describe this infamous election in the form of a nickname – the Revolution of 1800. While the goal of this essay is to further analyze different ways in which the election itself was revolutionary, it is still important to understand Jefferson’s initial purpose for the phrase, the Revolution of 1800. According to research, this phrase began because Jefferson believed that the election was a revolution of policies. In other words, he found the peaceful transition between a government functioning from a Federalist leader to a Democratic-Republican leader to be quite revolutionary. Jefferson is correct in the assumption that him and Adams embody completely different political views, but

    Read More

  • Tyranny Dbq

    463 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Abolishing Freedom Of The States

    690 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the end, it boils down to the fact that they no longer had a common cause. Now that the revolution was over, they were left with a myriad of decisions to be made for their new nation all of which caused

    Read More

  • How Did African Americans Contribute To Conflict

    594 Words  | 3 Pages

    In an attempt to repair a fracturing nation many more laws and orders were passed by Congress and by State governments. Many of these laws were met with opposition on both

    Read More

  • Examples Of Corruption In Julius Caesar

    276 Words  | 2 Pages

    If you are reading your history book, a play, or even watching the news today, you will see how people abuse the power that they have over somethings. There have been many leaders and people who abuse their power over civilization and places. Even the littlest taste of power often leads them to corruption. Many times, citizens and adversaries riot over some of the things that they disagree on and, in some cases, murder comes in to play.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Causes Of The Mexican Revolution

    618 Words  | 3 Pages

    Such as in Mexico leaders were tyrannical and changed laws in order to keep them in power, just as Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna did. In a different way, there was political instability in Britain due to there being high taxes, little representation in

    Read More

  • Inequalities In 1984, Orwell, And The Cruthur Miller

    1875 Words  | 8 Pages

    To many of these people, democracy and simple rights were more important than even life. They simply desired a society and government that was for the people and provided the people a way out of economic hardship. This can be seen clearly through the emotional song lyrics of a Syrian Revolutionary who states that “the oppressor has made our lives, no longer worth living” and that the “traitor”, or in this case the government, “is the one who kills his own people” (Shahid). Clearly, the revolutionaries of these Arab Spring movements hold very strong resentment and frustration toward their respective governments. This hints, rather obviously, at the strength that the revolutions held.

    Read More

  • Propaganda In The Handmaids Tale

    1784 Words  | 8 Pages

    To begin, the foundation of every government’s power has always been fear. Governments depend on public fear to secure societal position. Tracing back to thousands of years ago, governments relied primarily on conquests. The research author Robert Higgs argues, “Losers who were not slain in the conquest itself had to endure the consequent rape and pillage and in the long term to acquiesce in the continuing payment of tribute to the insistent rulers.” In other words, Higgs’s point emphasizes that the government violently conquested lands and hence attacked people living there in the old times.

    Read More

  • Haitian Revolution Compare And Contrast Essay

    1231 Words  | 5 Pages

    In our history there have been many wars, revolutions, and consequences to all of these things, such as lives lost or land being destroyed but it was all worth it when they succeeded and got what they wanted, freedom. Many countries go through revolutions because they might have been under rule from another person and or country and wanted their independence. A revolution is when people overthrow a social order or even a government and are in favor of a new system or government. The American Revolution and Haitian Revolution had some similarities and some differences and this is what my argument will be about, comparing and contrasting both revolutions.

    Read More

  • Authoritarian Government In Russia

    1179 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history the form of government adopted by states has repeatedly changed due to people or oligarch’s pressure to obtain a better management of the country and of their interest. It is of fundamental importance to see how the transition between a form of government and the following one took place. Roughly we can identify two ways in which this transition can occur: the first one is a peaceful shift, a compromise between the request of the people and the position of the government on the subject that satisfy both in the long run, the second one is a revolution. We need to make a further division about the outcome of a revolution, doesn’t matter if violent or not, meaning if it leads to an improvement or worsening of the state of democracy

    Read More

  • French Revolution Justified Dbq Analysis

    1265 Words  | 6 Pages

    Do the ends justify the mean? If you were an American soldier ready to be deployed for a massive land invasion of Japan, the atomic bombs saved your life. World War II ended when the United States dropped the atomic bombs and saved thousands of American lives. The French Revolution faced a similar dilemma. The rallying cry for the revolution was equality, liberty, and fraternity, bringing the first democracy to France.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Should United States Help Refugees?

    1625 Words  | 7 Pages

    As expected, terrorists took advantage of this political environment. The violence and lack of state control agencies such as police, made those Middle Eastern countries risky and unsafe place for innocent people to live in. Most of us have seen the terrible killings in Iraq and elsewhere there, but the Syrian tragedy is considered the worst. Around

    Read More

  • Robustness Of The Authoritarianism Eva Bellin Summary

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ever wondered why many Middle Eastern and North African countries have not switched over to democratic ruling? Eva Bellin has cracked our inquiries with this essay entitled "The Robustness of the Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective". Bellin's essay is highly based in research on why some Middle Eastern and North African countries cannot become democratic. What determines this is the will of the people and the capacity of resources (that will help in overthrowing the Government). For example one of the reasons why most North African and Middle Eastern countries do not have the will to overthrow their Government and establish a democratic Government is because some staged coos turned out non victorious (150).

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The French Revolution And Arabian Revolution

    1322 Words  | 6 Pages

    Introduction: Many revolutions can have things or events in common which are known as similarities, and the opposite which is differences. Thesis: The French revolution and the Arab Spring revolution in Tunisia began with people protesting for their political rights, and they also both caused economic instability. However, they were different because technology had a greater impact on the Tunisian revolution. Body paragraph 1: In the two revolutions, the French Revolution and Arab Spring revolution in Tunisia, political protests was the factor which they had in common.

    Read More

More about Revolution Dbq

Open Document