Rhetorical Analysis of Professional Writing Introduction A rhetorical analysis assignment is investigating how the author presents his or her work to a certain group that he or she intended to present. Genre such as news and magazine has a lot of rhetorical analysis to a certain interest’s group. The document will be analyzed today written by Christine Bannan. She was a winner of 2016 Edelson PC Consumer Privacy Scholarship. She also a third year student at University of Notre Dame Law School. The article:” The IoT threat to privacy” published by TechCrunch in August 14th, 2016. In the modern world, technologies become essential to us. We connect everything to the internet, and Bannan discusses about the problem of having connected devices …show more content…
Through out Bannan’s writing, she establishes the problem with privacy policies from the company which have connected devices. She explains about that data being collected without the users’ agreement from the company. For example, she points out that, “most people do not read privacy policies for every device they buy or every app they download, and, even if they attempted to do so, most would be written in legal language unintelligible to the average consumer.” Which leads to her concern about exploitation of the company’s privacy …show more content…
She uses an example of the Department of Education which do not allow students to abuse the loophole. She explains, “The Department of Education prohibit the use of pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreement by for-profit schools. “Therefore, it would apply the same for Federal Trade Commission, which should not allow the IoT’s company to use “pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreement.” This gives her suggestion a strong support because it based on the regulation that already exist. By using comparison and contrast, the author promotes her
The article “Your E-Book is Reading You” by Alexandra Alter appears to be controversial in regards to the rhetoric aspect because it manages to prove not only positive stance on the issue of E-Book surveillance, but the negative one as well. The author manages to keep her stance objective, so it becomes unclear what exactly the she is attempting to prove. Therefore, it is important to pay attention to the rhetorical devices that the author uses, which are ethos, pathos, and logos (Brundage, 8-9), in order to reveal make author’s standpoint on the matter. Before getting to the three major rhetorical techniques, examining the title gives a clue as to the author’s implied position on whether the digital surveillance of E-book producers is good
In Jonathan Locker's article "OnStar: Big Brother's Eye in the Sky,” shows the flaws of a well-known company that delivers convenient services to many vehicles. Though this amazing Technology is used among thousands of consumers it is built with a variety of flaws. His persuasive literary writing grabs the attention of the readers with his opinion “OnStar invading privacy”. Locker uses different scenarios to prove his major points towards the audience. OnStar is in the near future which will eventually evolve and monitor many drivers.
Toasting waffles in the morning is not simple anymore. In the article “Is Your Toaster Spying on You”, author Chris Baraniuk outlines a concern for privacy by many people. While most agree that technology improves the quality of life, some advancements come within question. Specifically, home appliances continue to rapidly evolve in technology. In many cases, the word “smart” tacks onto the name of a technologically improved home device.
Given the opportunity to write the Rhetorical Analysis Essay, I was able to express what I have developed and acquired in Writing 39B class. Moreover, this particular essay illustrates endeavour I have accomplished as well. In the Rhetorical Analysis Essay, I showed the impacts of Indian traditional family value system on globalization. I claimed that traditional family values prevent the globalization to reach an area, due to beliefs and cultures. For example, some families in India prohibit their children to get higher education, whereas assign them to work for their families.
Another aspect which has now become the part of the privacy is the selective disclosure of the personal information. In today’s world where we accept terms and conditions before downloading any app, before signing up any account and also put our pin numbers for the online payment, it raises the assumption that we have given our consent for the use of our personal information. Now one might wonder in the light of today’s situation that we are actually giving our consent to violate our own privacy. But the consent given by us have the restriction and in this respect A F Wistein had defined privacy as :
In the article “In Defense of Distraction” Sam Anderson states the argument of attention in today’s society and how that attention has diminished within each other and has created a poverty of attention. Anderson persuades his reader by demonstrating his knowledge of the issue and showing how he is unbiased which establishes trust with the reader. He also makes his reading easy to understand and the way the article is broken down into parts, which engages and allows the reader to be successfully navigated by a good teacher of the issue. Lastly, Anderson persuades his audience by relating to them which creates sympathy towards his argument by using the audience perspective to serve their aims and his own personal experiences. Throughout this
Preface The Founding Fathers took into consideration the need for privacy when writing the Bill of Rights when stating " The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated"(U.S. Const., amend. IV.). This demonstrates an authoritative need for a person to have a right to privacy. The current condition for privacy must evolve with the means in which it can be accessed. The access to information in 2015 is astounding, but what is more astounding is the magnitude and means that private information can be transferred. Elementals of Privacy
A rhetoric analysis is essential in identifying and analyzing written and non-academic genres. In this analysis, the rhetoric analysis focuses on two genres namely, a portrait of Leonardo DiCaprio holding his Oscar award alongside the image of a tiger mimicking a “high five” sign. The second analysis is a short article by Wong that highlights Leonardo DiCaprio’s Oscar award and his message on global warming. “Une photo de tiger par jour” has used several rhetoric devices such as captivating images, text, and imagery to convey his message. The picture of a Tiger showing a high five gesture depicts the use of humor and evidence to inform the audience about Leonardo’s Oscar Award and wildlife conservation.
The fast development and proliferation of technology raises multiple and various questions that led to the reconsideration of the traditional concepts of human nature, dignity and freedom. By starting from the Transhumanist project, the present essay discusses the grade of freedom and privacy reduction that such technological progress involves. Nevertheless, the possibilities of surveillance and control over individuals. The first section of the article analyses the some of the risks implied in the Transhumanist movement focusing on its negative outcomes. The second section describes the current post-digital environmental situation with special attention to the issues concerning the risk of privacy and freedom loss.
When in fact we are being watched every hour, minute and second of our lives through a very inconspicuous object that no one would ever believe would be the key to our personal life. That object is our phone a device that is with us everywhere in our pocket or purse. The author states “ the surveillance and privacy implications are quite simple…Cellular systems constantly check and record the location of all phones on their networks” (Maass, Rajagopalan. 2012). This article confirms the fact that not only does the government have the capability of knowing who you are or where you are. Even the same phone company you pay for phone service monthly has the power to see where you are.
In the book “Big Brother”, they have many examples of how they use surveillance in their everyday lives. Some examples include helicopters, police cameras, and listening in on everybody's conversation through their cellular devices, whether it’s a cell phone or computer or tablets. While reading the article “That's not my phone. That’s my tracker” it coincides with
RFID and facial recognition technologies without ethical boundaries do not effectively “prevent others from harming us, wronging us by making use of knowledge about us, or [provide us] fair treatment and equality of opportunity” (van den Hoven 290). An example of how these technologies cause harm is they can connect people “without their awareness or permission, to intimate details available online, like their home addresses, dating preferences, employment histories and religious beliefs” (Singer 5) which could hinder them from being treated equally. If an individual frequently texts and drives in the privacy of their own car, a computer inside a car could prevent that individual from getting a job with a transportation agency by reporting this activity to the employer although the individual wouldn’t behave that way on the job. If more people knew about this, then there might be a fear of doing something that will cause them to be discriminated against and this leads to people constantly questioning their own actions constantly which could alter the way that society operates. In Never Forgetting a Face, Singer declares that there are two sides of the argument when it comes to emerging technologies “those who think the technology needs rules and regulation to prevent violations of civil liberties and those who fear
Moreover, individuals such as investigators, legislators, regulators and even privacy campaigner have an increased attention towards the privacy issue. For this reason, security issues in the internet have become a threat in the internet. (Loeffler 2012, p12) Furthermore, a loss in privacy can lead to a disastrous effect such as that even a complete stranger to you would be able to know all about you, from your name until your child’s name. ‘Soon, it may not be possible to go online without at least telling your device who you are.
In the United States, the right to privacy is understood by Americans as one of the fundamental rights of all people. In the age of satellite surveillance, video cameras, position tracking, communication monitoring, and electronic surveillance, whether an individual can truly experience privacy is questionable. Surveillance in public places such as stores, schools, and workplaces has become commonplace. Most employees have become accustomed to being monitored daily at the workplace. It is understood that anything they say or do is recorded and any inappropriate conduct could result in their termination for the job.
The idea of Identity and privacy plays an important role on everyday life in regards to ICTs. Privacy is a human right, whether this be at home or online. People should be allowed to share only the things they would like to be seen by other people but on the internet this is not the case. Anything that is posted on the internet cannot be removed; it leaves a digital footprint that can be tracked. Tracking can be as simple as looking at an Amazon review you wrote with an account linked to your credit card or matching your internet history with your IP address.