Rhetorical Analysis Of Athletes And Compensation

552 Words3 Pages
In “Athletes and Compensation”, the article argues about the salary of athletes in the United States, and whether or not they are paid a substantial amount. The author discusses the average salary for each professional sport, and also the revenue collected from the athletes as well. The article also informs the reader of the reasons why the author believes the athletes need the salary they receive. Throughout “Athletes and Compensation”, the author utilizes the rhetorical strategies of logical appeal, emotional appeal, and tone to support his argument that athletes are not overpaid whatsoever. To begin, the author uses logical appeal multiple times throughout the article to persuade the reader that athletes should not have their salaries lowered. For example, he states: “In 2010, the National Football League earned $9 billion in revenue while the National Hockey League generated the least revenue among the four sports, still totaling $2.7 billion!” (“Athletes and Compensation”) This quote provides the amount of revenue from each sport, which proves to be a ginormous sum. The author uses this statistic to show that although athletes are paid quite a large amount, they still earn back most of the money they receive through revenue and profits.…show more content…
In the article, it says: “Professional athletes, being physical in nature, can also lead to injuries that require thousands of dollars in medical treatment.” (“Athletes and Compensation”) The athletes require the money so if they are injured, they will be able to pay for their treatment. The author mentions this to attempt to persuade the reader to feel sympathetic for the professional athletes, and why they need their salary. If athletes were underpaid, they would be unable to pay for medical treatment, and possibly would not be able to continue playing the
Open Document