Mentioning Gandhi, and stating his thought son the best ways peacefully cause change. This is showing the audience that Chavez realizes that these men have proved their methods the best, and he doesn't want to change them just try to use them for the benefit of the people. “ The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause”. This quote really does work so well because of the organization that is used by Chavez to convey Gandhi’s message. If Chavez had not eased this very power quotes into is writing, they would not have been hear the same way.
Both had so many things in common, but also contrasted in many ways. Chavez was more successful than Gandhi because Cesar helped millions of farmers in California with rights. Cesar Chavez was a human rights activist. Chavez was a fierce farmers rights worker because he made efforts to make workers rights for everybody. He did this by forming the United Farm Workers (UFW) and boycotting products farmers picked.
In line 60, Chavez says how the people want to “avoid senseless violence.” Chavez also states that victory through violence is not a true victory in lines 65 to 70. In lines 74 to 77, Chavez states that “violence doesn’t work in the long run.” Chavez describes the negative effects violent resistance had on the oppressed throughout history in lines 78 to 86. By using strong diction, Chavez shows how violent resistance is not a good idea and how it hurt the people. Chavez also uses diction to support his argument for nonviolent resistance. Lines 12 to 16 illustrate how nonviolence helps the cause of the oppressed.
Cesar chavez was a leader who gave a voice to the people who did not have one. Our monument will have a statue of Caesar standing above a pillar. He will look like he is shouting and he will be holding up poster of his black eagle on one hand. The black eagle is the symbol that is printed on the flag of the United Farm Workers (UFW). This organization was created from a merger of two organizations, one of them being created by Cesar Chavez.
Acclaimed activist and political leader, Cesar Chavez, in his article, attempts to convince the laboring class and those in need in America to restrain from any use of violence during their struggle. Throughout his article Chavez is able to maintain a predominantly straightforward positive tone in order to motivate his audience to lean more towards a non-violent approach to their problems. His purpose is to persuade the laboring class in America to abstain from any use of violence during their struggle. Chavez further elaborates his desire and purpose for his followers by utilizing the use of pathos and logos. Chavez is in the mentality that nonviolence is the only way his followers- the rest of the labor union- will achieve their goals and abstain from any injuries or harm that could possibly happen to them.
One of the rhetorical strategies Chavez uses is Repetition. Throughout the essay, Chavez kept using words and phrases like “we are convinced,” or the word “nonviolence” to keep his opinion about nonviolence more clear and straightforward. He is trying to get the point across that you have more opportunity with nonviolence than if you take the violent path. Another way Chavez uses rhetorical strategies is though pathos.
In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance. The two allusions to historical figures develop Chavez’s argument as they remind him and the audience of how large of an impact nonviolence had on the world in the past and how it could be applied to the
On the next two paragraphs it is going to be showing their differences and their similarities. Cesar Chavez helped in civil rights. He even helped himself because he was a latino Chavez quote was “Talk is cheap It is the way we organize and use our lives every day that tells what we believe in.” This quote means do not talk crap it's the way we all come together and
Cesar Chavez Rhetorical Analysis Throughout the existence of mankind, many cultures and civilizations have encountered a form of injustice treatment that has resulted in political movements. Some were supported by violence, such as the Revolutionary War, which was an ultimate result of Great Britain’s lack of freedom of religion, while others, such as the women’s suffrage movement, were based solely on nonviolence. In one of his magazine articles, Cesar Chavez explores Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s idea that nonviolent resistance is the most powerful when fighting injustice as well as why and how this is possible. Throughout the entire article, Chavez works in a compare and contrast mode as a means to construct a juxtaposition of violent