In the text his main purpose was to persuade farm workers not to use violence to get their (farm workers) demands met, and boycott grape farms. In doing so the farmers would have to give in to demands of labor leaders. However, due to the struggles of others Throughout his speech there is a determined and insistent tone. Chavez asserts repeatedly that nonviolence is the only way for change to happen. The repeated use of “we”, “us” and “our” conveys the message to the audience that he is one of them. Chavez can relate to the farm workers based on his credibility (ethos) because of his past. Chavez went to work on the farm fields at a young age and knew exactly how the frustrated workers felt. In addition, referencing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the text further established Cesar Chavez’s ethos. King was someone who was revered by proponents of civil rights. Associating an audience with a prominent figure such as Dr. King adds to the credibility in the rhetor. Chavez uses the main persona of a human …show more content…
Few scholarly journals that deal exclusively with the rhetoric of Cesar Chavez, and even fewer have expanded on his relationship with the Catholic Church. The significance the text has today is the same it had decades ago, however, there is no detailed explaination for what other entities influenced Cesar Chavez. The message of protesting, boycotting, and marching through nonviolence is more productive than a violent one. Mahatma Gandhi was a great inspiration to Chavez. Gandhi was instrumental in India breaking free from English rule. Gandhi was always steadfast on a nonviolent resistance. His fasts were demonstrations that he believed there was good in all humans. He fasted on several occasions. For example, he fasted to stop riots and most famously for freedom from English rule. Chavez, himself, would exhibit fasts throughout his life in the same manner as
When Cesar was a child he helped his family by working in the fields with them. He labored in the fields, orchards and vineyards. Since he was a migrant worker himself, this led him to become an activist for people in his situation. With non-violent acts such as: strikes, boycotts, marches, and fasts, Chavez was able to teach others how commitment and sacrifice can set you free. Chavez gained rights such as “...rest periods, toilets in the fields, clean drinking water, hand washing facilities, banning discrimination in employment and sexual harassment of women workers, requiring protective clothing against pesticide exposure, prohibiting pesticide spraying while workers are in the fields and outlawing DDT and other dangerous pesticides…” (24,CCF), and much more for farm workers when he established UFW as the first successful farm workers union in American history.
This establishes that Cesar made everyone in the boycotts and strikes that he performed with the UFW, United Farm Workers, feel important. Chavez made the farm workers feel especially important. As a result of this, migrant workers did their job even greater than they used to once being helped by Chavez, and were
Throughout the article, Chavez uses aggressive words to help convey a certain message of equality. His stern tone and straight forward points helped show the importance of equality. It is emphasized that "poverty and powerlessness lies heavy in the fields" to show an example of the hostile words used to persuade a push from citizens for the civil right movement. Referring to the fields is a way to
He organized a union that would protect and serve the farm workers. Cesar learned that you cannot protect everyone and everything, but he still never gave up. In order to do the jobs that he did, he would have to overcome the fear of the unknown. When he started his jobs, he knew there was going to be danger involved. He knew every time he went on a march there would be the possibility of death.
Through his extensive, and persistent campaign, Chavez would constantly try to convince his fellow farm workers and union supporters that an effective organization could be created against these injustices, only if they worked together as a community, and were also willing to give up their own sweat and
Art Torres attended Chavez’s funeral, and declared, “Cesar Chavez is our Gandhi, our Martin Luther King” (León 857). He compares Chavez to these activist to what he did to help those Latino workers. Chavez was a leader to the Latino farmers, and led them to better working conditions. Chavez is known for the social justice work he did. After his death, he was nominated for two medals.
As a child, he would pick crops on many different farms, then went to school. At school, he could not speak Spanish, his native language. If he did, we would be hit by the teacher. The Chavez's had no permanent home, living where they could near the farm where they worked. His mother taught them many valuable life lessons.
Cesar Chavez explained nonviolence as a form of bringing awareness to not only the wages, working conditions and treatment of farm workers, but also the overall treatment of marginalized people in the United States. However, growing up with the perspective of the farmworker’s inspired him to spread the word of resistance against the growers and the government as a whole. Cesar Chavez purpose of La Causa not only inspired people to become a part of something so great, but to inflict change individually by encouraging his brothers and sisters to become mentally and physically strong. Which I believe is the backbone to a non-violence protest. It’s also the mentality a social worker should inhibit because dealing with change, it requires many of
To begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing.
In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.
When he became older, he wanted to help the farm workers with their hardships, creating a union to help fight for their rights under the name United Farm Workers. As it states, “Under
In Cesar Chavez's article, he argues that nonviolent resistance is better and more efficient than violent resistance. He feels very strongly toward this belief, because of the mistreated farmers, and hopes that these farmers will civilly resist. Chavez refers to Martin Luther King Jr. and adds on to his point towards nonviolence resistance. Chavez publishes this article in a magazine because it is the tenth anniversary of the assassination of King, who Chavez strongly admires. Chavez uses a comparing technique to discuss violent and nonviolent resistance, a mix of appeals to ethos and pathos, and strong diction to emphasize the importance of the current problems his society is facing.
Cesar Chavez help Mexicans and Chicano’s make progress in economic rights for themselves. “Believing that the only permanent solution to the problems of farm workers lay in legislation, Chavez supported the passage
Fields Taking A Stand “An union leader and labor organizer who dedicated his life to improving treatments, pay and working conditions for farm workers was known as Cesar Chavez” (Chavez). Chavez was speaking out about what the labor workers were poorly going through and their ability of experience are being treated greatly unfairly. Chavez was addressing toward the governor, Jerry Brown, that these problems does not deal with and something should be fixed. Chavez argumentative speech gives recognition to the workers that is, “ We need to give workers a voice” (Voice Of Democracy). The Farmers Worker Movement was fighting for a suitable equality among whoever were part of the labor workers.
Chavez began his journey in community organizing as a shy young man who was not well educated but under the influence of Ross he learned ways to get people involved with his causes. Chavez explained that one of the things he learned was if he wanted to convince someone he had to dedicate the time to them, educated or not, all that mattered was a display of interest. This was exactly what Ross had done earlier with Chavez when they first met back in San Jose, California when he was working on an apricot farm. The dedication of teaching interested people would be useful in developing the farmworker’s union as it would teach farm workers to become leaders as Chavez had become. He states when recruiting a farmworker you have to both tell them the idea and explain it in away they would understand because they do not have the time to figure to how to play politics.