Rhetorical Analysis Of How To Say Nothing In 500 Words By Paul Roberts

781 Words4 Pages

The Underlying Style of Paul Roberts Paul Roberts is pure genius. He wrote this book called, “How to Say nothing in 500 Words” in 1958. The current year to date is 2015, and I strongly believe that what he interpreted then, makes just as much sense now. It is like Roberts wanted to reach out to college students and help them see the true importance and preciseness that writing takes. Everything that he explains in this essay is a key factor that plays into everyday writing. Roberts takes what he knows, and magnifies it into something that the average reader can understand. By looking at rhetorical strategies, author's opinion, and personal comparisons in “How to Say nothing in 500 Words,” it is easier to perceive Roberts overall message.
Rhetorical strategies are the real base behind the composition of writing. They are something that readers can use to help reflect on what the author is trying to express. Logos, or appeal to reason or logic, is easily used the most throughout “How to Say nothing in 500 Words.” For something to be correct in his essay, it only makes sense that what he is explaining should be logical. For example, Roberts believes that when …show more content…

Rhetorical strategies don't just convey a piece of writing under a certain category, but place them in a way that truly affect how a reader sees them. Author’s opinion can allow for a reader to connect directly with the tone of work that Roberts is trying to display. Lastly, personal comparisons can make a reader learn from their mistakes by using the information given in the text. All Roberts wants to do is better any writers willing to seriously try, and by following the steps in “How to Say Nothing in 500 Words,” the task becomes much simpler. I have already grown so much from just reading what he has to offer. Roberts is a brilliant

Open Document