The gun laws was enforced by John Howard. The prime minister of Australia, John Howard served from 1996 to 2007. Though that time he has slowed down the mass shootings in Australia. Australia 's success is remarkable since guns have
Based on the evaluation of “Universal Background Checks Mean Gun Registration, Gun Bans and Confiscation” by Wayne LaPierre it is incredible, biased, and inaccurate. Wayne LaPierre “incorrectly claimed Obama pulled a bait-and-switch, promising during the campaign not to take away anyone’s guns, but now supporting an assault weapons ban. Obama is not now seeking to take away anyone’s existing guns, and he has for years consistently supported a reinstatement of the assault weapons ban.” This shows that LaPierre is only trying to rally support and gun activists to deny any gun control laws. With the facts shown, “Obama has consistently supported reinstatement of an assault weapons ban such as the one Feinstein is now proposing — even as he was vowing not to take away anyone’s guns.
Throughout his work, Kristof uses strong sources that strengthen his credibility and appeal to ethos. He references a book, A Biography by Michael Waldman, the president of of the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law. He quotes Waldman as stating, “Gun control laws were ubiquitous.” He then includes in his own work, “As a distinguished former congressman, Robert Cousins, put in 1910:
Supporting detail: With gun control, the usage of the gun is being reduce. So that, the percentage to have crime with gun is being reduce too. Limited owners of guns in gun control also should be a very effective way to reduce the crime rates. Due to people have no right to own a gun, many firearm cases such as mass shooting, firearm robbery, and shooting in lost minded can be avoided.
The author, Issit uses statistics to explain why gun advocates believe legal gun ownership accounts for more deaths even though, the gun ownership decreased over the past years. They find gun ownership and violence being a very important argument among individuals in the world. Issit demonstrates the different group of individuals that gun ownership effects. For example, the different intake of the gun control argument has divided groups such as, republicans and democrats. The gun ownership explanation is carefully demonstrated and understandable.
However, that appears to be highly unlikely. Believing that the President of the United States would kill innocent elementary school students in order to gain support for more strict gun control seems absurd. This serves as an example of how American’s can not accept what is going on and there is chaos in our country. Society must always blame a more powerful source for tragic events. This particular event happened to fall on the shoulders of President Barack Obama.
Yes, education about guns would be good but for example, all most everyone knows what drugs, smoking, alcohol does to one but that does not stop them. Some readers could argue that strict gun control laws do not work in Mexico, and will not work in the United States. However, these are two different countries and citizens, what might not work there might work wonderfully here. Some many think gun control laws such as background checks and micro-stamping are an invasion of privacy.
Nicolas Kristof uses many rhetorical devices to make points in his piece titled, Our Blind Spot about Guns. He compares the attributes of gun safety to the attributes of car safety and attempts to make a point that the government should regulate guns in the same way cars are regulated In this piece, Kristof tries to convince the reader that regulating guns, the same way cars are regulated, will an effective way to decrease the amount of deaths by guns every year. In the beginning of his writing, he lays out a factual calculation of how many Americans died annually before cars were regulated (161). He then uses a rhetorical device called an analogy when he states, “Yet, instead, we built a system that protects us from ourselves.
"Guns are why we 're free in this country and people lose sight of that when tragedies like this happen" says Scott Ostrosky. He also stated, " A gun didn 't kill all those children. A disturbed man killed all those children. " Tragedies like these shootings are the purest example that we need to make sure that the wrong people do not get their hands on these tools. And they are the purest example that gun laws are weak and so are background checks.
Did you know that a poll from 1994 showed that 80% of Americans support the death penalty? The death penalty has been in effect since the founding of our country and still remains to this day. It has been proven effective, yet there are many opponents of it who call it cruel or flawed. We should maintain capital punishment because it deters crime, helps the victim 's family and provides justice, and is better than life imprisonment. One reason to use capital punishment, is that it deters crime.
He believes that new rules and restrictions on firearms, will have little to no effect on accidental shootings, as well as mass murders. The writer is a reliable source in the
Guns are the cause of violence in America, the best way to reduce violence is stricter laws on guns. Stricter laws would reduce mass shootings by intensifying background checks. Mass shootings have become a familiar American topic in recent years. “In the wake of a fatal shooting at a community college in Oregon, Hillary Clinton plants to tighten regulations on those who manufacture, sell, and purchase guns.”
A very big topic in the presidential debates is the war on drugs. Joe Biden has many opinions on why they shouldn’t be legalized. Joe Biden 's views on drugs are that they should not legalized, he believes that marijuana is a gateway drug. “Marijuana is a gateway drug; legalization is a mistake” Source: CelebStoner.com Entertainment News , Dec 24, 2010 Immigration is huge for Joe Biden, Biden stated that he is in favor of the border fence more for the purpose of halting drug trafficking than stopping illegal crossings. Biden believes the immigration system is broken and it needs to be fixed He hopes for a guest worker program as well.
“Our Blind Spot about Guns” Rhetorical Analysis Essay American Journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his essay, “Our Blind Spot about Guns”, addresses that if only guns were regulated and controlled like cars, there would be less fatalities. Kristof’s purpose is to emphasize how much safer cars are now than in the past, while guns do not have the same precautions. He constructs a compelling tone in order to convince the reader that the government should take more control on the safety of guns and who purchases them. Kristof builds credibility by successfully exerting emotional appeals on the audience, citing plausible statistics, and discussing what could possibly be done to prevent gun fatalities. Kristof begins his essay by discussing how automobile
Gun Control Debate Jake Novak, in an article for CNBC titled, “Gun control isn’t the answer. We already know how to stop the violence,” gives his opinion regarding the controversial issue of gun control. Novak argues that gun control is not the answer to rising gun violence but that proper enforcement of the law would go a long way in reducing the cases of gun violence in America. He states, “We actually solved the issue of rising gun violence in America in the mid-1990’s and again in the early 2000’s by doing something radical. We enforced the law” (Novak 28).