Rhetorical Analysis Of Make College Free For All

He attended the University of Chicago for three years, and graduated with a political science degree. During his time in college, Sanders was an active member of the Congress of Racial Equality as well as being involved in the historic March on Washington in 1963. He told the Burlington Free Press, “That was clearly a major American injustice and something that had to be dealt with” (5 Things You Should Know About Bernie Sanders). Even then, as a twenty-two year old college student, Sanders was already finding ways to make equality happen. After graduating, Sanders told Guardian newspaper, “I saw unfairness. That was the major inspiration in my politics” (Bernie Sanders Biography). His inspiration and determination later made him America’s longest-serving independent politician in Congress. His political career started when he was elected mayor of Vermont’s biggest city, Burlington, in 1981. After filling this position until 1989, he soon took a seat in the House of Representatives from 1991 to

“On average, college graduates make significantly more money over their lifetime than those without a degree… What gets less attention is the fact that not all college degrees or college graduates are equal.”(pg.208 para. 1) Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill are senior researchers at Brookings’ Center on Children and Families, Sawhill is also a senior fellow in economics study at Brookings’. Owen and Sawhill authored the essay, “Should everyone go to College?” The authors use a wide variety of rhetorical devices in the essay, including ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade their audience to take another look at whether college is the right choice for them. Throughout the essay, the authors keep a neutral tone so that they come across as non-biased,

Bernie Sanders believes that college tuition isn’t in the interest for our country’s future. Bernie Sanders states “It is insane and counter-productive to the best interests of our country and our future, that hundreds of thousands of bright young people cannot afford to go to college” (Bernie). Bernie Sanders’ point is that many of the talented people in our society may not be able to pursue their dreams or pursue their desired job because they and their parents can’t afford college. If Bernie Sanders is right that many Americans can’t afford to go to college, as I think they are, then we need to reassess the popular belief that FAFSA and other scholarships will considerably lower the price for college.

For those who have graduated from high school and will continue with their higher education, many if not all of these students will have to pay out of pocket for college. Most of students think that if they graduate from college or a four-year university they will have a chance to work in the professional field rather than work for minimum wage. It is an opportunity for anyone, particularly those who have low wages, to earn a degree and make more money. In the article “Expanding Community College Access” from The New York Times, President Obama states that tuition for community college should be free, because the American workforce is not educated enough for the global and national workplace. The presiding evidence and statements from experts

Education is often considered as the key to economic development as a well as the key to success in any society. As a result, the government and other education stakeholders need to work hand in hand to ensure that the quality of the education administered in their jurisdictions and states meets the international standards and can help create a pool of educated citizens. In recent years, the issue of making public university and college education free has hit the media with all media houses, leaders as well as citizens from different states and regions presenting their cases for and against this idea. This issue first came into the limelight during Democratic nominations last year when both candidates expressed their intentions in making higher learning in our colleges and universities free for all students. Just like most countries in the world today, united states only offer free primary and high school education, but public university and college students receive living grants, tuition subsidies and public loans to finance their education. Despite seeming like an appealing idea, free tuition for higher education has its advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this assignment is to present cases for and cases against this idea as well as showing clearly why the government should offer free university and college education.

As a college student, I understand the struggle of debt. I come from a family with low income. Growing up poor, the burden of working and going to school had its hardships and took a large toll on me. Now that City College of San Francisco gives free tuition it has helped. I’m still struggling, however, not as badly as last semester thanks to free college. Matt Bruenig author of “The Case Against Free College” has researched poverty, inequality, and welfare systems, giving him credibility and knowledge to writing this article he makes an effective argument. Bruenig states what free college means can be interpreted differently by individual students, including understanding all students are not equal when it comes to free college. Free college

Beginning with a short summary of Obama’s proposal, Coulter quickly attacks every morsel of the idea. Coulter assumes a college degree is essentially worthless, and according to her, making it free will only devalue it more. She reports that most graduates are working entry level jobs that don’t even require a degree. Coulter’s stance on “the state of higher education” is the “product has… gotten much, much worse.” College students are being “brainwashed” into becoming Democrats, she claims. She points out that college is only a way to turn out “left wing thinking liberals” and that the actual education is an “increasingly worthless product.” Universities are taking into consideration that the public will pay almost anything to “invest in their future.” Coulter compares college to a “cartel that fixes prices” according to her theory that “education is an industry.” She concludes by attributing Obama’s proposal to be only a ploy to instill leftist ideals into young naive

I think that Senator Sanders did a fine job in including and shifting also the focus on the solutions that will not only help the future of our country, but also the help the middle class. Although I understand that Senator Sanders has good purpose to bring to light the injustice that the middle class faces, we have to also face the reality that is that our political system has been made that the wealthy are the ones who have the most power and voice in our country. Not in a negative way, but in a sense that capitalism and wealth go hand in hand, therefore our country can no way evade this system that has been around for long. This book on Senator Sander’s speech, is relevant to our political system because it brings to light how a socialist mindset or behavior isn’t what helps or ultimately makes up our country, but proves that capitalism is how our system is

College education should be priceless because it could give students the life that they want. They could show their talents to the world plus they can live the life that they want. With college education being free they could make other people happy for them, and be happy for themselves. An article says that, “ People would have more freedom to contribute their talents, try new ideas, and pursue the lives they want if they didn 't have to start off in debt or stay stuck in a low-wage job. That could lead to happier people. Also, happier people could lead to a happier, more prosperous nation as a whole. “ ( trade-schools.net/articles/should-college-be-free.asp). This shows with college tuition being free more people can be happy and less stressful. In addition, college education should be free since it gives students the life that they wanted and concentrating on their studies.

Bernie Sanders’ progressivist activism most directly affects my life. Although he is not a Senator or Representative for my state, I admire his character and commitment towards achieving national equality. With ideologies far more advanced than those of his presidential running mates, Sanders is the ideal politician for my generation; I chose Bernie Sanders because I truly believe that almost all of his political beliefs are logically and humanitarianly superior to those of other 2016 presidential candidates and on-par with those of many modern countries. Bernie Sanders is a candidate who, if elected president, would catapult America into an unprecedented period of domestic development and prosperity. However, if Sanders is not elected president,

Bernie Sanders makes an extremely strong argument that college should be free, he greatly enhances his credibility by utilizing statistics and examples. Using examples like; it would take a minimum wage worker a year of working to pay for one year of in state tuition for college, Bernie makes his argument relatable and convincing. Bernie Sanders additionally states that Americans carry more tuition debt than they do auto loans and credit card debt. Bernie also uses Statistics like there are 1.3 trillion dollars worth of student debt in America. This information strongly increases the strength of his argument since 1.3 trillion dollars is such a large number. By Bernie Sanders including statistics and multiple real life examples he makes his

While it is true that the United States of America has the highest GDP, the USA is behind other countries in regards to tuition free colleges. There are a number of European countries that offer tuition free college including Finland, Iceland, Germany, and the Danish get paid roughly $900 a month for attending college. The countries with this idea are able to capitalize on the benefits that tuition free colleges prove in two ways: fiscally, and socially. A study conducted The Contemporary Economic Policy shows that community college graduates receive higher earnings (Wheeling). These earnings will increase the amount that the country is worth because now there is a population of people who have expertise in special fields. The report also indicates a decrease in the cost for health related objects, lower crime rates, and lower unemployment. If college is made tuition free, the United States of America can start paying less for all of those items. This would result in a more stable state because a more intelligent population will cost society less. Since the United States is already a top contender in the bigger areas of the world, maybe it is time they put their money where their mouth is and catch up with some of the other countries and pay the bill of the public colleges. The investment is well worth

College tuition should be free because there are many underprivileged families whose kids work hard in school that deserve to be able to have a college education. Some kids who do amazing in school and receive amazing grades are not able to get into the college they want due to the high cost of tuition. In 1918 public schooling became a requirement for people up to the age of 18, now in the 20th century a college degree is becoming a requirement in getting a job but not a right to all American citizens. A college diploma is becoming a necessity, it’s essential for getting a nice house, having a good car, and building a better life so you 're not

Trying to go to college with no financial support is difficult; therefore, I agree with the government in making two years of college free for all students. Although many students attend college, most can’t afford the cost of obtaining the degree. The students who make it through college are left with the progressive debt they’ve built, due to student loans; therefore, the government granting students two years of free college will, in turn, decrease the amount of debt accumulated by students from student loans, allow students an adequate amount of time to determine what occupational field is desired, and level the playing field in the labor force for students who wouldn’t normally be able to afford college; therefore, they have no degree to

The point is, all we know is that someone will pay these dues through taxes, and the uncertainty of who will carry the burden is not making many Americans comfortable. By negating the large bill of a college education, we could see an increase in the number of students able to attend college. This then creates a more well-educated workforce and a population that has better critical thinking skills. This could lead to more innovation in all areas of society.