Rhetorical Analysis Of Michael Moore's Sicko Documentary

1251 Words6 Pages
Rhetorical Analysis of Michael Moore’s “Sicko” Documentary
Sicko is a documental film made by Michael Moore in 2007. The director is the main speaker in the movie. Moore is a famous American documentary maker who was awarded for several of his works. There was not any special occasion for creation of this film; it looked like the director collected enough facts from different time periods and social groups and decided to reflect the situation in his new project. Moore mentioned some horrible, contradictory cases, they all had similar level of “severity”; there was not any specific event that could be treated as the trigger for the documentary’s creation. All Americans below the upper class be treated as the potential auditory for the Sicko. Moore involved people from different cities and social groups, but all of them were united by the same problem. The topic affects everyone who contact with health insurance
…show more content…
This status adds points to his credibility. In his works Moore mentioned many pressing problems like media’s work, situation in the housing sector or medical insurance. He acts like he tries to demonstrate the real situation in the mentioned sphere. It is obvious that Moore’s documentaries often create depressive impression. People can say he does it deliberately by choosing only negative examples, like the situation with Kaiser Permanente that did not help Dawnelle Keyes’s small daughter in time because she was not delivered to the right hospital at first (Sicko 01:10). The author really did not mention any positive examples of American medical insurance system’s work. It creates a feeling of prejudice as the system should have positive results to exist for so many years. However, Moore gave enough examples to show there are severe problems in the American medical insurance. Mentions of numbers, historical recordings and people, who decided to share personal experience, support author’s
Open Document