Device Rhetorical Question & Hypophora: Nabokov uses rhetorical questions extensively in his third paragraph. He asks, “Can we expect to glean information about places and times from a novel? Can anybody be so naive as to think he or she can learn anything about the past from those buxom best-sellers that are hawked around by book clubs under the heading of historical novels?” He continues with more questions until he ends with the use of hypophora, “And Bleak House, that fantastic romance within a fantastic London, can we call it a study of London a hundred years ago? Certainly not. And the same holds for other such novels in this series” (3). Nabokov does this in order to have his students think deeper about what fiction is compared to literature …show more content…
He then says that there was a “go-between” between the situation of the wolf when it was actually there and when it was a lie. This go-between was literature. Nabokov returns to this story and says, “the magic of art was in the shadow of the wolf that he deliberately invented” (13). Nabokov is trying to say that imagination creates literature while still being true to the time. Nabokov does this to further show his purpose. It allows his audience to better understand his message and to see how he thinks literature is made. They can more easily understand his purpose and agree with …show more content…
After his introduction, Nabokov asks multiple rhetorical questions followed by a hypophora. He then continues his lecture by elaborating on his answer to the questions. He also introduces section by saying, “We should ponder the question how does the mind work when the sullen reader is confronted by the sunny book” (7). Once again, Nabokov follows this with an explanation of his answer. He does this again when he asks, “So what is the authentic instrument to be used by the reader? It is impersonal imagination and artistic delight” (9). He uses this hypophora to introduce his topic of the paragraph before elaborating upon the answer to the question. Nabokov then transitions into talking about the qualities of a writer. He starts this section by giving the story about the boy and wolf and then relating it literature. He then relates literature and fiction to nature. He also specifically mentions three qualities of writers: “a storyteller, a teacher, and an enchanter” (14). He then explains each type, and ends with saying which is most important and explaining why. This structure allows him to more easily organize his thoughts. It also allows his audience to better understand his lecture. It separates talking about two different people, the reader and the writer. It also allows for the audience’s questions to be asked as well as answered within the lecture. Nabokov is able to explain why
By setting a formal mood, Foster creates a feeling of trust from the reader, that they can count on him to be a reliable source of information. However, by referring to his own personal experience of learning and being oblivious to hidden allusions to classic literature, the reader is assured that they can, eventually, read literature like a
Over the course of millions of years, it is believed that the human brain evolved to become the intelligent machine that it is today. Decision making is one of many adaptations the human brain has made. . However, there are theories now that humans do not make all decisions in their conscious mind. Something known as the “adaptive unconscious” is thought to process and order data quickly so as make impulsive decisions without the brain even thinking. This can be identified when one gets a gut instinct.
A book writer, Truman Capote in the novel, In Cold Blood, published in 1966 addresses the topic of enclosing murder of the Clutter family, and argues that In Cold Blood is a different type of book he calls it nonfiction novel. He supports this claim by narrating illustrating the Clutter family story and the murder story than using the real story of all the characters, then uncover the murderers through time spent with them and their interviews, and finally motives that went to the death sentence of Smith and Hickock for committing the crime. Capote’s purpose is to convince the reader in order to get the reader to believe his novel is a different writing style called nonfiction novel. He adopts an incredulous tone for his audience, the readers of novel, and others interested in the topic of murder through the use of
Rachel Carson wrote about her experiences while at the sea. There is a whole exciting world at the sea which is fascinating. The reader can see this world from the perspective of Carson. This is because she is successful in conveying the true picture of the place. Carson uses ethos, pathos and logos as well as, definitions, simile, cause and consequence to tell about her experiences at the sea.
The essay written by Sherman Alexie, uses many rhetorical devices to persuade the readers to help educate many who don’t get the opportunity to learn. One of the main rhetorical devices used in this essay was simple syntax. The sentences were quite short in many places. This was done to put emphasis on his childhood, and his experience with learning to read. In paragraph three Alexie uses lots of analogy.
In Chapter One of Thomas Cooley’s The Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, the audience was exposed to several strategies recommended for reading pieces of literature. These strategies were divided into three segments: Previewing the Text, Reading Closely and Critically, and Responding to What You Read. Each segment contained a list of either advice or questions the reader could heed to while analyzing their given text. Later, the chapter exposed the audience to the four traditional types of writing utilized.
Shade Lost: The Dissolving Narrators of Nabokov’s Pale Fire Charles S. Ross, Professor of English at the University of Hartford and a literary critic seemed to betray a kind of distaste for Vladimir Nabokov’s Pale Fire in two book reviews about the novel. In one review of Brian Boyd’s analysis, Ross comments, “...the whole structure of the book is annoying, in fact, because it insists that a reader go through a series of missteps in order to reach the grand solution…” (375). I agree with Ross. The book is terribly difficult to decipher. But my own difficulty with the novel is largely due to an aversion of the primary narrator of the text, Charles Kinbote, whom I found intrusive.
At first I wanted to argue with his ‘one story’ ideology, Ayn Rand’s Fountainhead got inside my head I suppose. However as he continued to engage with it, providing examples of how past works foster and provide a way to increase the depth of a story, I started to appreciate it more. It wasn’t that he was saying good literature only comes from traces of older works, and then adding their own traces to be applied similarly to new works.
In the book “Catcher in the Rye” the main protagonist and narrator of the novel is Holden Caulfield. Holden is a 17 year old telling us about his story last Christmas at age 16. At age 16, Holden was a junior at school. Holden is being kicked out for failing four of his five subjects. It was the last game of the year and Holden didn't go to the game to say goodbye to Spencer, his history teacher.
It drives home his claims and allows the reader to pay attention to their life; what they may or may not be doing to help
He changes up his style of writing to keep the reader entertained and also gave them a view of a student’s perspective in
Although he learned a lot due to books, he believes that each book teaches you a lesson. He believes that all bad books usually have a greater lesson to teach you than the good books. Books also thought him what he can and can’t do while writing. While reading books he learned “Good writing, on the other hand, teaches the learning writer about style, graceful narration, plot development, the
To make them understand and try to convince the reader to care more about
In a small Town called Waymer, there is a boy named Palmer who does not want to be a wringer. A wringer is a young boy who strangles pigeons which is part of the town’s tradition. During the town’s annual pigeon shoot it is an expectation that when boys become ten years old they become wringers. Jerry Spinelli’s book, wringer, is about the struggle to conform; in this case Palmer does not want to be a wringer because he cares for the pigeon. In the beginning of the book, it’s Palmers ninth birthday
Saint Petersburg, the setting of Crime and Punishment, plays a major role in the formation in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s acclaimed novel. Dostoyevsky’s novels focus on the theme of man as a subject of his environment. Dostoyevsky paints 1860s St. Petersburg as an overcrowded, filthy, and chaotic city. It is because of Saint Petersburg that Raskolnikov is able to foster in his immoral thoughts and satisfy his evil inclinations. It is only when Raskolnikov is removed from the disorderly city and taken to the remoteness of Siberia that he can once again be at peace.