Organ sales and donations might seem like part of a dystopian book like The Hunger Games, but Sally Satel's Organs for Sale debunks that notion and advocates allowing the sale of organs. Sally Satel supports the legalization of organ sales in her article "Organs for Sale," inspired by Toulmin's model and Aristotle's arguments. Satel makes a compelling case as to why a regulated organ market would be a better way to address the shortage of organs available for a transplant, employing a variety of rhetorical techniques including ethics and pathos. Satel organizes and presents her case logically according to the Toulmin model. Reasoning, supporting evidence, potential counter-argument, and argument likelihood are the six main components of …show more content…
The first sentence of the article describes the author as a practicing psychiatrist who also taught at Yale and was a resident researcher at the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, a nonprofit organization dedicated to the study of medical policy and mental health.. All of this gives us a lot of information about Sally Satel and shows her credibility as an advocate for the organ market over charity. We can trust her because of her training as a psychiatrist, her experience in the field of medical ethics and politics, and her work as a resident at a non-profit organization. She also is a kidney transplant patient herself! Describing the problem from personal experience. She makes a compelling argument as to why legalizing the sale of living donor organs is a great way to address today's organ shortage problem.She offers in-depth justifications for the moral and ethical precepts at play in the argument over organ donation.. She addresses potential objections and concerns in her writing, and she does so in a way that strengthens,’ her authority and knowledge of the subject, which in turn helps readers develop a sense of trust and dependability. I don’t see in any way how she has failed to give us a reason to not trust …show more content…
She discusses the case of Carl, a man who died while awaiting a kidney transplant. She describes how his family was left to mourn his death (Satel, 2001). By sharing these stories, Satel instills in her readers a sense of sadness and urgency, compelling them to consider the human cost of the organ shortage. Satel appeals to the emotions of her audience and makes a compelling case for legalizing organ sales by humanizing the issue and presenting the real-life consequences of the organ shortage. In her article "Organs for Sale," Sally Satel appeals to readers' emotions to emphasize the human cost of the organ shortage and the urgent need for a solution. She describes the experiences of patients waiting for transplants in vivid and emotional language, such as the case of a woman with kidney failure who spends four hours a day on dialysis and can no longer work or care for her children (Satel, 2001). Satel evokes empathy and compassion in her readers by emphasizing the human impact of the organ shortage. Overall, Satel's use of pathos adds a powerful emotional dimension to her argument, urging readers to see the organ shortage crisis as a human tragedy rather than a technical or policy
In the essay, “Organ Sales Will Saves Lives” Joanna MacKay elaborates that kidney failure is a major problem that has a possible, not so complex solution. Mackay believes that this issue could possibly be resolved if the legalization of organ sales were to be possible. In fact, her main argument throughout the essay is that government officials should not waste lives, but rather help save them by legalizing this process. Furthermore, she explains the dangers of the black market and how authorizing organ sales would benefit all parties involved. Overall, MacKay thoroughly claims that organ sales would ensure greatness for the recipient but also for the buyer; most importantly, she believed it would give someone a chance to continue living
Kidney Transplants - The Hottest Thing Since Botox “Organ Sales Will Save Lives,” by Joanna MacKay, is an informative persuasive article where the author enlightens you about the worldwide kidney crisis and actively sways her readers into personally believing in her argument. MacKay uses facts to appeal to the readers' logic while simultaneously playing on their emotions in a perfect balance, and she is successful through substantial use of data, refutations, and a toss between a serious and passionate tone. MacKay starts her argument off strong by using the appeal of data. This is an amazing strategy to begin her argument with, considering not many people know what end-stage renal disease is, what it does to the body,
Organ donations from one donor can save up to eight lives, and also change the lives of more than fifty people (“Facts About Organ Donation”). What is simply baffling about this statistic is the fact that most people usually don’t consider that something like organ donation could be that impactful. However, in Mary Roach’s Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers, she explores the relevance of this process, as well as many other topics associated with the scientific study of cadavers. The purpose that Roach is trying to convey in this novel is to persuade the audience to think about the impact cadavers have had in history, as well as in the world today, and to consider the options she provides as to what can be done with the human body after
A unique approach to explain a controversial topic that is not discussed as much as it should. The story was first published all the way back in 1988 by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics and was post on the website ten years later. Currently, the topic of organ transplants, specifically kidneys, are not discussed as much as hearts and lungs. Schulman manages to create a non-persuasive story that focuses on all the common thoughts that are taken into consideration when discussing organ selling. Her use of rhetorical techniques was very important because of this type of writing.
During the previous decades, society’s behavior with regard to organ donation remains reluctant. A survey showed that although people plainly accept to offer their organs for transplantation, when a person dies, his or her relatives often refuse donation. To be able
I think the author did a superb job at getting her point across in such a structured way that the audience would not be confused by the use of terminology that they were not familiar with. She also still made sure that the audience was well informed through accurate statics of how many lives would be affected by selling organs. She also involved the audience by giving them a peek into the future, which allowed them to stimulate their own idea of how beneficial selling organs could be as well as created an empathetic feel when she discussed how many people that has and are currently
Every 10 minutes, a new person is added to the organ transplant list (organdonor.gov). That’s 144 people each and every day. With the help of human cadavers, those 144 people can be helped and be given the opportunity to a more prolonged life. Mary Roach uses her book to inform people of this and uses different rhetorical devices to convince people to join in on the donation. Mary Roach has always had an interest in science related topics, whether she is experiencing it first hand or is writing about it.
An organ is so much more than a body part in fact it may even be a life line for some. Could you imagine selling your organs just to put food on the table? Joanna MacKay wrote "Organ Sales Will Save Lives,” which was published in 2016 in The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings by Richard Bullock. In this article MacKay argues that lives should be saved not wasted. MacKay helps build her credibility throughout this article with facts and statistics.
The essay “Organ Sales Will Save Lives” by MIT student Joanna MacKay was written for a class on ethic and politics in science. In the essay MacKay elaborates that kidney failure is a major problem that has a possibility, not so complex solution. MacKay believes that this issue could possibly be resolved if the legalization of organ sales were to be possible. In fact, her main argument throughout the essay is that government officials should not waste lives, but rather help save them by legalizing this process. Furthermore, she explains the dangers of the black market and how authorizing organ sales would benefit all parties involved.
The text is directed toward medical personnel because it causes them to question, “what if”, organ sales legalized or what would they gain from this legalization? His article is also directed towards people in need of an organ, and organ donors. Gregory is successful when he uses logical, emotional and ethical tactics to persuade his audience on why organ sales would be beneficial. Some logical tactics Gregory uses to persuade his audience is giving the number of how many people die waiting for a transplant. He states, “...there are only about 20,000
More people are likely to donate if they would be rewarded so that they are helped just like the recipitant. She states that there are several donors in third world countries that would gladly give away their kidney’s for only the cost of $1,000. They are in such a desperate time they would sell their body parts, just to help their family survive. Another reason why organ sales should be legal is because it would stop the illegal trade of kidney’s.
Consequentialist Argumentsupports organ salesbecause it has global beneficial effects, as everyone (buyer and seller) is benefited, and it reduces scarcity of organs for transplant and many lives could be saved. Autonomy Argument favors organ sale since it is autonomy-enhancing factor for seller, as he could have more options and authority now. Then he talks about possible circumstances where organ sale situation would take place. He distinguishes it into two possible kinds: a just one and an unjust one. Then he chooses to adopt the concept of unjust situation to talk about, which he explained is unjust for seller,if it involves severe suffering and deprivation,which however, is avoidable and where political agents are involved but they fail to take measures.
These because paying donors for their organ is considered unethical5 . There are issues organ sellingamong the poor for money; and the unjust access of wealthy people to donated organs5 . The uncontrollable commercialization of organ donation national organ waiting list from the
Ronald Faison Eng-106 February 20, 2018 Professor MaryBeth Nipp Definition Argument Essay The selling of human organs under U.S law is illegal for many reasons. By having bids on life or death situations can have a negative effect on people with low to no income waiting for an organ. The only lawful procedure for someone to receive an organ transplant as of now is to be placed on a waiting list. Human organs that are sold is considered human trafficking because it is the process of selling or transferring human tissue by force (National Institute of Justice, 2007).
Turning over a new leaf ignites a healthy, curious-filled life. (“Organ Transplantation: The