Liam O’Flaherty was an Irish author that wrote short stories that had a mix of brutal naturalism, psychological analysis, poetry, and biting satire (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica). He wrote many short stories that got readers to think in a different way to solve what is going on in the story. One of his many short stories, The Sniper, is one of his most popular and most abstract pieces of his work. Knowing this, The Sniper is a perfect candidate for a rhetorical analysis paper. The story starts off with a sniper on top of a building scouting for other snipers that are trying to kill him. The sniper feels tired so he eats a sandwich and drinks some alcohol. He puts away the alcohol and feels that he should risk being seen so he can light a cigarette, but he made the wrong choice for an enemy sniper spots him and takes a shot that hits the rooftop the sniper is on. He relocated and looked for where he was being shot from. Then an …show more content…
War is destruction at its finest. If a country wants to make peace then why would they kill thousands of the other country’s inhabitants for peace? That is the complete opposite of what peace means. Peace means freedom of disturbance, quiet and tranquility. It does not mean explosions, gunshots, and death everywhere. People that have witnessed war like the sniper develop a mental illness called post-traumatic stress disorder, (PTSD). PTSD causes those who have seen a tragic event to have nightmares, anxiety and uncontrollable thoughts of that event (get.smarter.com citation). In a war every soldier witnesses something that is tragic, it could be an explosion destroying a church or it could be a young child getting shot with a sniper rifle. The destruction of war can cause people to go insane. What is the point in having a war if that country lost so much more than what it was trying to gain? War is not a peaceful solution to a country’s
Through the usage of graphical features used by Xan Brooks, it reinforces the idea of the portrayal of killing shown in the American sniper is morally unacceptable and is not accurate. At the top of the film review is a photograph of ‘Chris Kyle’ portrayed by Bradley Cooper. In the image, Chris is sitting in a military aircraft, facing a rectangle object covered with the United States flag symbolising independence and liberty. The object is presumably a coffin holding a comrade lost in the brutality of war. The position of the coffins show the reader how with war, death is never far behind - this is shown by how the two coffins look as though they are following each other.
“I’m willing to meet my creator and answer for every shot that I took…” (www.imdb.com). Kyle, in the movie American Sniper, says these exact words for a reason. Matt Taibbi, who wrote American Sniper Is Almost Too Dumb To Criticize, had a reason why he structured and presented the article the way he did. There was a purpose to everything he did. Not only does Taibbi present his information in a specific way, Matt wants a specific group of people to read his article and agree with his arguments that he is making.
Hard Work Solves Everything Adversity is a difficulty that people go through. Adversity helps makes people work hard and overcome obstacles to become successful. The short stories “The Sniper” by Liam O’Flaherty is a story about a man who overcame adversity on the battlefield. A sniper was watching a street when he was shot in the arm.
War is happening all over the world and is an important issue in society. Why would one nation fight another? Is it for power? Whatever the reason may be, war is definitely leaves an impact on one’s life. War is a pitiful cause that can invoke an inevitable negative change within one.
In Cold Blood, by Truman Capote, epitomizes the varying sentiments associated with the murder of the Clutter family; these emotions range from shock, to grief, to pride, and everything in between. However, through Capote’s specialized descriptions about each character, the relationships between their feelings and their actions become further elucidated. As a result, the readers begin to feel sympathy for the victims, their friends and family, the investigators, and even those who brutally murdered an innocent family. In order to create this connection, he utilizes the rhetoric device of pathos to strengthen the audience’s ability to sympathize.
When talking about war, there are many books with few answers to what war truly is. Barbara Ehrenreich brings forth not only the possibilities towards understanding war but also the passion people from history have had towards it. One key issue she brings to light is humanities love for war, so much so that people would use excuses like holy wars to justify their need to fight in a war. She declares that war is as muddled as the issue of diseases and where diseases came from around 200 years ago. More so than that she even goes further on to state that these rituals that date back to prehistoric times are the cause of human nature during times of war rather than human instinct.
As many think war is a problem solver, it also starts several small problems in itself. Personally, I have never been a fan of the idea of any kind of war. The thought of thousands dying, millions of dollars being used, and home lands being destroyed, just doesn’t make sense. In the book I found a small part that I believe shows how war is a waste.
War is about principles. It can be used to end injustice, tyranny, or both. It can band people together to form a bond that is unbreakable, all fighting for the same cause. But that bond can have a high price. War kills soldiers, tearing them from family; it kills innocent people, just trying to survive.
In a desperate attempt for peace, as ironic as it may be, we create chaos, resulting in the death of millions at a time. Firearms burn bright in the dim sun, exposing the vibrancy of blood-stained suits. As the bullets penetrate skin, the life of another innocent individual has already been lost. Families never to hear a last, “I love you” before their loved one tragically passes in a loud, chaotic mess. They run towards the danger, knowing exactly what result the soldiers might have gotten in the gamble of life or death.
Although hundreds of thousands of people die, nothing has been achieved. What was won was lost, or will be lost again. Nothing is permanent, and life is always changing, always evolving. The end of war doesn’t mean the end of one’s ideals. War likely fuels things even more, and leads to other conflicts, which would lead to war, and it would continue in a cycle forever.
"The Sniper ̈ by Liam O’Flaherty is a short story about a sniper who was in war, when he saw an old woman point at him he shot her, and while doing that he got shot in the forearm. The sniper tricks his enemy by taking his cap off then he puts it over his rifle to make it look like a person. When the sniper got his enemy he was curious about who it was, when he flipped over the body he saw his brother's face. Through the character's actions, the readers understand that war is full of courage, but it may never end well.
I couldn’t agree more with that just imagine how many more people would of have died under the brutal oppressing force of Saddam Hussein if the United States had been unwilling to expel the invaders. War is an awful thing, its dehumanizing but unfortunately war is often necessary. Pacifism has a great intention, if the United States was pacifist, we wouldn’t be the free country we are today. It would be great if everyone was a pacifist and got along. It would be great if we could solve our problems with words.
After turning over the corpse though, he finds out it’s his brother. In, “The Sniper”, by Liam O’Flaherty, the sniper learns that violence and assumption can cause us to act in a regrettable way. The theme of assumption and violence is first introduced when the enemy sniper shoots and kills innocent people. The sniper takes place on a rooftop near O'Connell Bridge, and, as we now, in the middle of the Irish Civil War.
In Liam O’Flaherty’s The Sniper, the main character, a sniper, is in the middle of a civil war in Dublin, Ireland. It is his assigned duty to assassinate anyone on the the other side of the war, no matter who they are. This creates a huge conflict, considering that the sniper ends up killing his brother. This supports the central theme that war is cruel, and this can be supported by the craft elements of the dialogue used and the setting of the story.
In O’Flaherty’s “The Sniper” and Hardy’s “The Man He Killed” both works use plot, irony, and theme to portray the idea that war causes you to kill those you care or may have cared about. There are many similarities and differences In the plot of both “The Sniper” and “The Man He Killed”, there are many similarities and differences.