Rhetorical Analysis Of Why We Can 'T Wait'

504 Words3 Pages
In a world of disproportional acts and egalitarian love, a multitude of controversial occurrences appear within society each day. Pertaining to legislation, there are both just and unjust laws that individuals choose to either follow or disobey. In Martin Luther King Jr’s., book, Why We Can’t Wait, the famous Christian African American civil rights activist dictates an argument referring to the defiance of an unjust law for improvement, despite how wretched the consequence may seem. In regards to expanding the authentic value of his piece, I am supporting him on account of ethical and liberal meanings.
If one does not comply with a certain unjust law then they should have the right to decline it’s worth in order to create peace for the common good. During 1849-1950, the era of black and white segregation, many people spoke out for their personal beliefs so that one day they may achieve freedom and rights as any living being should always be privileged to. For instance, the female civil rights activist, Rosa Parks, discontent with the inequitable law, stood up
…show more content…
In spite of the mindboggling tone that provides, indubitably it is sensible because in order to disdain an unjust law for a positive outcome suggests that the individual cares deeply about the just laws in the world. Throughout history women have typically taken a subordinate roll in life compared to men, due to patriarchal societies. Anne Hutchinson, a courageous female Puritan, challenged church authority by providing her opinions and advice about faith through her knowledge of the Bible but was taken as a threat and was thrown into the isolated area of independent thinkers, Rhode Island. Although Hutchinson experienced poor treatment after supporting her hopes and dreams she influenced many women to fight for the same cause, ultimately leading to further freedoms for the
Open Document