Rhetorical Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Their Finest Hour

In the past there have been many amazing and inspiring speeches that people have read. One of the amazing speeches was called I Have a Dream read by Martin Luther King Jr. He shared with the world that everyone is equal no matter the color of their skin. Another great speech that had been spoke was by Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain during the Civil War before they had gone into the three day battle at Gettysburg.

On June 18, 1940, Winston Churchill addresses the House of Commons, and later the British public, on the devastating blow the allied forces received in Belgium and their highly successful retreat with the assistance from the British Navy. Winston Churchill’s speech, “Their Finest Hour,” motivated the British people to continue fighting a war that approached ever closer. Through the sheer will of his words, did he join together a nation to stand up against a mighty foe. In this speech, Churchill uses his mastery of rhetorical speaking to promote patriotism and duty among the people while also using logic to ensure they have a fighting chance all wrapped in beautiful poetry.

Not every person who declaims a speech is the best public speaker. For thousands of years, the oration has known where the political leaders have used to address their countries’ citizens, and Winston Churchill, who was the sharp Prime Minister of the Great Britain through his famous speech “The Finest Hour1,” became the model for speeches in the modern policy. His speech “Their Finest Hour” was apparent and describes the phases that the Great Britain passed during the World War II from the weakness in front of the Nazi Germany with Adolph Hitler to adjust the progress of the battles and achieve the desired victory. Moreover, he succeeded in stopping the attacks in the British cities, especially London to the shore and the sea cooperating with

’’ , “Terrorist attacks can shatter steel , but they cannot dent the of American resolve.” He also uses the word “our” many times in order to cause a feelings of unity among the nation. He then tells what has already been done to help solve the problem of 9/11. By doing this he gives a sense of relief to his audience. Finally he quotes Psalms 23 in order to give one last word of encouragement.

In any situation where one feels threatened, frightened, or hurt an instinctive reaction occurs, a frantic cry for help. Seventy years ago an incredible man sent a similar appeal to the people of America, an appeal not for himself, but for the countries of Europe falling under the boot of Hitler for the second time. Over flickering American radios each syllable thundered  from Winston Churchill’s soft tones as he narrated his speech from London. The powerful message erupted through the air, a message for the people of America, forever reminding them to extend a helping hand to those in need, a message who’s power came simply through Churchill’s brilliant use of voice and choice of wording. Each sentence chocked with sarcasm yet contained a hint of desperation in the attempt to arouse and motivate his audience to aid their allies in order to achieve justice and peace once again.

The general purpose was to persuade. Churchill organized his speech to instill confidence in his audience, hatred of the common enemy, and a bond between America and Britain. He was an articulate orator with humor and was great at relating with Congress. He knew how to hit the right tone with his American audience that gave him a lasting resonance.

oosevelt uses many rhetorical devices to make the audience trust him. He uses Ethos to make them feel like they are equal even though he has a substantial amount of power over them. He uses Pathos to tell about emotions that could be present in the state that the nation was in the Great Depression. The President uses logos to tell the hard truth to the American people and he tells them the truth.

The speeches we have read and heard today are all a product of those amazing, articulate speeches that shaped America. All great speeches share a common goal and that is to persuade their audience. However, the authors of these speeches had to use lots of figurative language to create images a more clearer understanding of the topic.

THESIS: “Their Finest Hour” by Winston Churchill brought Great Britain together, giving people hope and strength in a time of need. Winston Churchill was born November thirtieth, 1874 “to an aristocratic family” (“Winston Churchill”). He was in the military and became a journalist. Eventually, however, he took after his father and went into politics.

Also, King has made a tremendous impact on the future of equality for all. Largely his most iconic speech was that of his 1963 speech, I Have a Dream (A&E Networks Television). Martin Luther king is widely recognized as one of the best speech givers of all time. Personally I picked him as a speaker to analyze as King appealed to the masses in a time period in which it was difficult, with a subject that was very hard to enforce. Also, one thing I really enjoy about King, as a speaker is his how relatable he is and how he practices what he preaches.

The fear of World War II was large and wide spread across the globe. The citizens of Great Britain, despite the fear, had a strong, powerful leader throughout it – Prime Minister Winston Churchill. On a live radio broadcast on January 4th, 1940, Winston Churchill gave a speech entitled “The War Situation: House of Many Mansions”. He used ethos, pathos and logos to persuade the people of Great Britain that as long as they continued to fight and to believe in their troops and their country, everything would be okay and they would win the war.

Furthermore, Winston always believed that a person should always fight for what is right, and that is what he did. With Winston leading his country against Germany, he led with an attitude of bravery and confidence, similar to how the British were feeling at that time. For example, Winston Churchill gave one of his most iconic speeches on the special day of June 4, 1940, where he used his words to inspire people to stand up for the Allies. As a politician he even gave a speech to Parliament and told them he had, “nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.” (history.com) He was showing that he himself was ready to fight as well.

In this essay, the following question will be discussed. Why did the Nazis choose to bomb London instead of the English Airfields, and how did this hurt them strategically? The following evidence and reasoning will discuss why the Nazis decided to take the course of action they did, and how it affected them in their conquest of Europe. The research will primarily be focused on the reasoning, and strategic effects of this decision by the Nazis, but will also discuss how the British used this to their advantage, and eventually won the battle of Britain. All of of the sources to be used in this paper were written far after the Second World War explosively concluded.

The ability to rally individuals together has been a staple characteristic of leaders throughout history. Through their use of speeches and rhetoric, great leaders have been able to convince individuals to follow them and their endeavors. This has led to many crucial events, creating the world we know today. However, how do great leaders apply rhetoric to convince people to support them? I believe they apply rhetoric through the use of literary devices and techniques, which allow for them to effect their audience on a much deeper level.