Rhetorical Analysis Of Zakaria's 'Paradox'

Certain ideals that are valued in American society have caused concern in some people due to the alarming threat they pose. In the passage, “America Needs its Nerds,” by Leonid Fridman, the author discusses a social problem he sees that is prominent in the United States. Throughout the reading, Fridman mentions how often anti-intellectualism is seen and why it is our issue in America. Fridman’s purpose in writing this passage is to bring the issue to the minds of people and to make them question their own personal stance. Fridman uses different strategies in order to convey his idea that people who are curious and serious about knowledge should not be labeled a nerd.

The Rhetorical Analysis of the “America Needs its Nerds” The mental capacity is treated as a disadvantage in the America, despite the fact it already helped the country many times. This long-term problem became the main topic of the Leonid Fridman’s essay “America Needs its Nerds”. The work first appeared on January 11, 1990 in the New York Times as a part of the series “Voices of the New Generation”. The author spoke about the negative attitude the American society has to smart people and demonstrates it with the usage of words like “nerd” or “geek”.

In nearly all historical societies, sexism was prevalent. Power struggles between genders mostly ended in men being the dominant force in society, leaving women on a lower rung of the social ladder. However, this does not always mean that women have a harder existence in society. Scott Russell Sanders faces a moral dilemma in “The Men We Carry in Our Minds.” In the beginning, Sanders feels that women have a harder time in society today than men do.

Gender stance in this quote are shown greatly due to how Hermione is portrayed as if she was some sort of intellect who looked down upon the males. As of reading this as an adult I would already notice how she is in fact the female who was portrayed as the one who knows it all. Additionally it also says “I know all about you, of course” (Rowling 84). This adds to on how she is viewed as the know it all and the intellect of the novel so far. The counterparts of the female were treated as if they were the inferior ones seeking to follow, the superior one, Hermione.

F or this written task, it is an editorial for the New York Times magazine associating stereotyping individuals through their accents. Stereotyping people’s accents has created a big controversy, if it should be considered as a racist remark or for entertainment. In this editorial, I will be explaining why stereotyping accents can and isn’t racist. In class, we investigated about this matter of why it is okay to make humorous remarks about certain accents over others.

For this week’s forum post I will examine former President Ronald Regan’s Inaugural Address. Now, the overall theme of this speech is informative; however, there are hints of persuasion being used during his talking points to invoke change within the citizens of the nation. Now, the primary informative method President Regan uses throughout this speech is explanatory. President Regan cites the explanatory style to showcase the issues that currently plague the country such as the economic struggle, big government, and enemies of freedom. For instance, President Regan showcases the problem of the nation borrowing money to sustain its economy is not a viable long-term solution.

All and all I believe friedman did an extraordinary job explaining the changes that took, but did a subpar job offering positivity and solutions. The old international system, which was abandoned in the late 1980s, was The Cold War System. This system was characterized by division and had two main superpower nations, the United States and the Soviet Union. Under this system, countries and companies were threatened and given opportunities based on who they were divided against.

The English language has developed in a way that makes the language ugly and imprecise. “Politics and the English Language” written by George Orwell in 1946, illustrates the fact that most people living in the United States generally write very badly and that they have to improve their writing skills. He argues that meaningless words are being used and that people are being lazy when they write. Orwell’s essay is a lesson on how people can improve their writing in a better way than they are now. He examines the connection between the degradation of language and the political orthodoxies.

“Requiem for the American Dream,” a documentary arranged by Peter D. Hutchison, Kelly Nyks, and Jared P. Scott, features an MIT professor of linguistics, Noam Chomsky, who narrates the film on the topic of inequality, democratization, solidarity, and unjust systems of today’s economy. Noam Chomsky intends to convince American citizens that the economy and democratic systems have negatively changed over the 20th century and into the 21st century. Additionally, Chomsky emphasizes that a shift in the economy from manufacturing to financial institutions is the result of the concentration of wealth and the Republican agenda for reformation. Due to the changes in the economy and the unjust vicious cycle, Chomsky is passionate and persistent in informing American citizens of the problematic economic shifts, spurring from the ideologies of recent presidents. Furthermore, Chomsky informs the public about how these illusory changes, implemented by the government, are negatively impacting the unaware lower class.

Clash of civilization by Samuel Huntington is believed to be containing facts about the political scene during the cold war era and stated or hypothesized that there is a new order prior to the end of the cold war. Societies and civilizations were divided by ideological differences. Political struggle between the ideologies of democracy and communism fueled Huntington’s arguments within the book. To begin his argument, Huntington classified civilization as the broadest cultural entity he also stated that civilizations are mortal but endures for a very long time and evolves overtime. Huntington also refutes some of the past paradigms that have been ineffective in explaining or calculating the reality of the global political order.

America’s past and foundation for economics impact our economy today according to Steve Dobransky. There is an apparent reason for how and why the economy in America is struggling today. The national debt our country faces may not actually be debt at all, but rather a result of past economic standards that were set but not revised or changed in the slightest. Dobransky explains how the printing of paper money by the federal government and the decision of 1865 contribute and negatively affect our economy today in America. ​Dobransky first shows how a change of industrialization impacted our nation.

With that in mind, I think the author is trying to reach an undecided audience, which makes us neutral. We cannot make up our mind, because America

Political theory is all about speaking to people to get their attention and make them think that that politician is the right person for the job. Engineering rhetoric uses the speaking aspect, like politicians, but not on a maximum scale. The difference has brought out many theories about the differences between the two jobs, for example, Samuelson talks about how rhetorical theory has changed and how it is implemented into jobs, “The latest evidence of the gap between political rhetoric and economic reality is the Democratic controlled House 's decision to set aside, possibly indefinitely, the free trade agreement negotiated with Colombia by the Bush administration”(Samuelson 1). Rhetoric has a major influence in the job creation and how people make a career and advance in their specific job field. Engineering makes the rhetorical stance for speaking to people to get the approval for their projects.

Another main purpose of being involved in wars is mainly because of the economy. As a nation, the united states was very much tricked when it joined the second world war. It was said by many economist that getting involved in the second world war would favor our economy through tough times. And it did! No doubt about it, we were able to get out of the great depression.

While some have been slightly improving, taken as a whole, Latin America is in a slump. Some of the viewpoints attributed this to the extremely interventionist policies instituted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The International Monetary Fund, according to the speakers, gives a large sum of money to these struggling countries and in return institutes standard policies that are not always successful. One source described it as an “experiment where they’ve forced these countries to implement tight fiscal policies and open trade and monetary policies regardless of what was happening on the ground, and it has failed” (21-22). However, officials from the International Monetary Fund dispute these claims, and assert that their policies have brought about positive change and growth.