if there is anything many people are against is these election times,“ Identity Politics ” a phase that covers a mulititude of sins. The author Stanley Fish American literary theorist, legal scholar, author and public intellectual.he has taught almost everywhere but he seems to think people have different outcomes of who they think should be in office .Just reading the title of the essay “When Identity politics is Rational” pretty easy to tell whats its going tot be about having equal rights to something or being fair . The purpose for the author writing this essay was to let the audience know that it does not matter what the skin tone of a person is nor how they look if they are male, female or if they are black and white . the people should
Finally, the film “The Patriot” by Robert Rodat uses the archetypes of the quest for revenge and the fall to reveal how we as humans are willing to go to war for freedom, and for family, and unite people together under one cause. People are willing to go to war for family, freedom, revenge and to bring together a country or group of people.
On May 5th, we learned the truth about media and did a quick test in "political compass". The thing I was astonished was the way a person on the wheelchair was treated in the protest. He was thrown by the police and dragged on the floor. I could not believe this because usually, we do not treat the people who have a handicap. Why could they treat like that?
We are getting into the season where political canidates will start campaigning and we will be seeing more of this. I believe that these canidates are using rhetorics to munipulate your thoughts and persuade you through manipulations. We will see more speeches with rhetorics as the months go by. I believe the majority of rhetorics are to persuade you through manipulation. It is more difficult to spot the rhetorics that are out there to enhance the statements.
Everyday the future in America looks brighter for the issues dealing with race and identity. Brave souls are not letting racism, class discrimination, or sexism hold them back anymore. Furthermore, the fight for a balanced society that pushes for equality is on the horizon. As we close on an era, based on purely the skin of the person, we need to analyze the impacts of the Ethnicity paradigm and Class paradigm on politics of the 20th century. Race and Ethnicity are used interchangeable in everyday conversation, however; they are not the same.
“Council’s Politics Loses One Identity; No More Straight White Christian Guys to Kick Around Anymore” is an opinion piece by Ken Herman, written about the city council of Austin, Texas. Ken Herman directly writes to his audience that we are a nation where “identity politics” plays a very “important role at the ballot box” (Herman, E1). He claims that there is only one “non-Hispanic white male Christian heterosexual” who has a seat in the city council of Austin, but he recently got fired by losing Jimmy Flannigan who is gay. Herman reports his opinion that he is not against having a diverse city council, yet he agrees strongly with the people who voted for these chair members. Herman’s tone is strong and powerful; this leads to the appeal of pathos.
Racialized critical rhetorical theorizing is the way the public and legal notions of race influence the decisions that are made for our society that changes outcomes or actions based on our society’s views. Throughout this essay there is a discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of racial studies, and the contributions of legal race theorists that have studied to understand the arguments of racialized critical rhetorical theorizing. When we focus on this subject, there is also an emphasis placed on positive reconstruction and race consciousness. Article Discussion This essay discusses and explores a specific rhetoric theory in which the issue of race is analyzed.
The author, Hua Hsu, believes the end of white America was put on a national spotlight when Obama was elected president, which is on the heels of the news of the majority minority switch that is supposed to take place in 2042. This switch would bring the relevancy of W.E.B Dubois, a civil rights activist, prediction of the problem of the twentieth century would be the color line, the race identification society asserts on individuals (Hsu 1). That reality, where the color line becomes a problem, comes to fruition with Donald Trump’s white nationalist views and his growing popularity. His ascendancy illustrates the problem of how we identify individuals and whether America will blur the boundary of race, where people are confined by the identity of race.
Kathryn Stockett successfully uses rhetorical devices to get the reader to feel and understand the perspectives of the protagonists. Stockett uses pathos, ethos, and logos in her book, since the book about social injustice. The topics in the book range from inequality of the sexes to social classes and racism, Stockett is successful in getting the reader to reflect while reading the book and the themes of the book have a clear presence. We see Stockett use ethos and pathos in the very first chapters when we learn that Hilly doesn't like Minny and Minny doesn't want to say why at first, but the incident with Ms. Holbrook was affecting her chances of getting a job because of the influence Hilly has over this suburban society. In some instances where Stockett uses ethos, pathos is also included in her writing.
Author Darryl Lorenzo Wellington, wrote “The Power of Black Lives Matter,” published in 2015 in The Crisis, and he emphasizes the importance of Black Lives Matter and argues that is the only way to correct the issue of class. Wellington builds his credibility with reputable facts, statistics, citing sources, and successfully employing rhetorical appeals such as ethos, pathos, and logos. He adopts a didactic tone of voice in order to sound like a high scholar to create a sense of superiority, while addressing the issues of class and race to white Americans’ and other races in the United States. In his article, Wellington first introduces his argument by making an inference of a cultural shift by saying, “Something indeed is happening here and now in America,” and that “class exists” and
The ability for people to look at a situation from a different perspective is vital in today’s globalized society. Diversity is the most important, core attribute we each share that gives us the ability to assess new situations through our diverse backgrounds and upbringings. Unlike Patrick J. Buchanan’s argument in his essay titled “Deconstructing America,” diversity is a necessity in America’s culture as opposed to the burden it is described as. Conversely, Fredrickson 's essay titled “Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective,” illustrated a more precise version of American history that disproves Buchanan’s ethnocentric ideologies. Buchanan speaks of diversity on a narrow, one-way street.
Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.
During the 1980s, space exploration was a popular topic to watch, listen to, and learn about in American life. NASA had already sent a lot of missions to space, all reaching new milestones and increasing interest in space exploration. The Challenger, however, had a different mission than the rest. It was going to carry the first teacher, Christa McAuliffe, into space where she would teach two lessons. There were six other men and women on board the Challenger.
Equality has been an issue in the United States for a long time. The article “White Debt,” written by Eula Biss, supports the fact that racial injustice still occurs in America to this day and time. Eula Biss is described as an American nonfiction writer who shares her personal experiences as a white woman through several different appeals to approach the intended audience. The purpose of her “White Debt” article is to inform the audience that enough has been done to people of color by the white people and it is time for reparations. The author argues the importance of changing the precedent in transition to form a civilized generation in the future.
In this passage, Charlotte Perkins Gilman highlights the theme that women must use their intellect or go mad through the use of literary qualities and writing styles. Gilman also uses the use of capital letters to portray the decline in the narrators’ sanity. This shows the decline in the sanity of a person because the words in all-caps is shown as abrupt, loud remarks. Gilman uses this method multiple times in her short story and this method was used twice in this passage. When the narrator wrote, “LOOKING AT THE PAPER!”, the major decline in her mental health was shown.
The National Anthem goes on every single time before a game begins. Each time it is being sung everyone usually stands up to show respect for America. While, news said that a few athletic players that have been sitting down, while the National Anthem goes on. This keeps happening more and more slowly because those athletics don’t believe that America lives up to that potential in the song as it once represented. As well as the incidents that happened with the police of excessive force being used against people unassertively.