Rhetorical Analysis The article “Arming Syrian rebels: Where the US went wrong” was written by Tara McKelvey. McKelvey is a features writer at BBC News in Washington, a senior editor at the Prospect, and a research fellow at NYU School of Law 's Center on Law and Security. Her article is an interview-based contrast that brings up the arguments that took place inside the US government lobbies concerning the Syrian crisis and how these arguments led the Obama administration to react in support of the Syrian opposition. Tara’s interview with Robert Ford, the former US ambassador to Syria, makes a strong case to fault the US decision of supporting the Syrian rebels. It was written on the occasion that the US government is modifying its strategy of supporting rebels in Syria. Tara was able to review the timeline of strategies that were implemented in reaction to the Syrian dilemma and how the US intervention turned out. The audience for …show more content…
Ford tells his side of the story in the interview. Also, she added testimonies from Bassam Barabandi, a former Syrian diplomat and co-founder of People Demand Change, Tyler Thompson, of the non-profit United for a Free Syria and Mohammed Ghanem from Syrian American Council. Finally, Tara supports her case with expert opinion; she quoted US Army Lt General, Michael Flynn, the former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency as well as Steven Simon, the former senior director for the Middle East on the US National Security Council and Capt. Chris Connolly, a spokesman for the coalition task force training the rebels. The case that Tara McKelvey is making in “Arming Syrian rebels: Where the US went wrong” is well supported by facts and experts opinions. The readers can clearly conclude that the US train-and-equip program for Syrian rebels came late and was not serious enough, which led to it being
Rhetorical Appeals in the Wounded Warrior Project Advertisements The Wounded Warrior Project recruits the aid of the American public to honor and assist injured veterans of the United States armed forces. Through financial aid, the non-profit organization provides programs for the physical and mental injuries of soldiers with little or no cost to the warriors. The organization also offers support services for the warrior’s family (www.woundedwarriorproject.org). Through advertisements, the Wounded Warrior Project hopes to gain the public’s aid to finance the organization’s programs.
One of the most impertinent questions of the modern time is: Should the United States involve itself in foreign conflicts or should it restrain from being enmeshed in world affairs? According Barbara Kingsolver’s writing in the novel The Poisonwood Bible, America should function in an isolated state, and not concern itself with the problems of the surrounding world. In the narrative “The Poisonwood Bible”, Barbara Kingsolver was meticulous in her choosing of allusions in order to establish her firm opinion that The United States of America cannot use democracy as an instrument to urge citizen engagement in political disputes. Barbara Kingsolver includes reference to different political and cultural aspects in the two focused regions in order to exemplify the juxtaposition between the predatory Price family and the Congolese victims. This apposition works as a parallel to further the author’s underlying message that if a country wants to adopt the American way of life, it should come from that country’s citizen and not the outside ruling of the United States.
Each side in this sometimes called “Proxy war” have different views on who are the terrorists. The United States recognises the Kurds as allies while Russia believes to see them as terrorists. With each side looking to strengthen the positions of whichever side they are supporting, the end of this war does not seem to be anytime soon for the country of Syria (Document
Adam Jacobson – Transnational Security – Position Paper 5 – 10/17/15 Michael Boyle, in his article “The Costs and Consequences of Drone Warfare,” argues that the United States’ policy of targeted killing by drones has been less beneficial and accurate than the U.S. government claims. The leaked “Drone Papers,” released this past week, which show the drone program as significantly ineffective and haphazard, reinforce Boyle’s conclusions. The “Drone Papers,” a cache of official U.S. government documents about the drone program mostly in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, while not the fount of groundbreaking information their publishers claim, are valuable in confirming information from unnamed sources the media has previously reported. For example, the policy of classifying any “military-age males” killed by strikes who were not being targeted as combatants instead of civilians, previously reported (and noted by Boyle), is confirmed in the documents. In many strikes, the government designated any bystander killed along with or instead of the strike’s intended target an “Enemy Killed in Action” or “EKIA.”
For many years, there has been a lot of controversy centering on the rate at which crime and violence is happening in society. Steven Pinker, the author of “Violence Vanquished” states, “We believe our world is riddled with terror and war, but we may be living in the most peaceable era in the human existence.” This quote from the article proves to many people that our world isn’t as bad as it is made out to be. In the article “Violence Vanquished” Pinker uses Logos, and an argument of fact to support the article 's central message which stands to prove violence is at an all-time low in today’s society.
This report does not aim to question the morality of assassinations; rather, given that the decision to assassinate an individual has been made, it analyzes the ethical arguments concerning The United State’s use of a drone strike as a means of assassination rather than spending Special Forces. Recently, the US military has increased its use of airstrikes by unmanned aerial vehicles (UVAs) as a means of assassination. This pivot in foreign policy has popularized the ethical debate concerning the effectiveness of ‘drone strikes’ as a means of killing America’s enemies. The use of drone strikes provides the US with the safest, cheapest, and least politically destabilizing method of assassination, though, increased transparency concerning the
Gaining media recognition, though still a paramount goal of guerrilla factions, is a tributary aim in that it is a stepping stone on the way to accomplishing superior objectives. Terrorists exploit “propaganda by the deed” and recognise that intercontinental activities will secure extreme media revelation. Initially, the PLO restricted their attacks to civil and Zionist institutions however, in order to ‘enlighten western civic opinion’ it became indispensable to alter their target to civilians both within and outside of Israel. Bruce Hoffman, one of the most prominent academics working in the field of terrorism, gives light to the efforts of the PLO as a manifestation of terrorism’s efficacy as a political tactic and places a substantial prominence on the internationalisation of their turmoil.
The final article analyzed is “PJ Crowley: Can Trump walk away after Syria air strikes?” published on BBC – the British public service broadcaster. The author of this article is PJ Crowley – a former US Assistant Secretary of State who will be able to provide a unique insight into the matter discussed than any British news reporter. Distinct from the first two articles, this one concentrates on the problem Trump counters with following the strikes, especially the damaged relationships with Russia and Iran. Crowley starts by reminding readers about the strike Trump ordered one year ago which failed to threaten Assad, explaining the reason why this second strike is necessary and supported by other national leaders.
The United States implemented resistance by launching missiles directly on the Syrian air base in an attempt to correct Syria’s murderous behavior. Because of the United States’ power decision, justice was served in Syria where it
Whilst many believe terrorism is a new phenomenon, the term ‘terrorism’ goes back several hundred years to the French Revolution. Concentrating on the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) and Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), this essay will compare and contrast the different strategies and tactics of terrorist groups from the 1970’s to the present day. In doing so, the essay will demonstrate consistency in strategy amongst terrorist groups – the search for political recognition despite differing tactical approaches to their campaigns. The essay will firstly begin by breaking down why the ideologies are similar and how they begin to form the overall strategy. Next, how the differences in media coverage have starved or helped each
Article Review: Rubenstein The chapter of The New Global Terrorism, Pyscho-Political Sources of Terrorism by Richard Rubenstein is a qualitative study that seeks to explain terrorist motivation using the attacks of The World Trade Center and Pentagon that took place in America on September 11, 2001. I found this article well written and interconnected to many conflict theories which I will explore in further detail throughout my review. In reference to my previous statement, this article is a qualitative study because it is seeking to understand a phenomenon using accounts of what happened rather than numbers to explain the study.
This article possesses Currency because it was made on a recent date known as August 17, 2015. This article does not have Reliability because it is biased against those who are against Jade Helm 15. This article has Authority because the author has written a multitude of article pertaining to controversial topics in America. The article does not have Accuracy because it references to people who have a lot of unfounded ideas in conspiracy theories without sufficient proof. This article does not have Purpose/Point of View because the authors intension for writing this article was to mock those who have conspiracy theories surrounding Jade Helm 15.
Walter Laqueur was editor and co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary History in the Washington Quarterly and London. As a Professor he has taught at the Universities of Tel Aviv, Brandeis, John Hopkins, Harvard, Chicago, and Georgetown. Teaching, acting, and writing for over 60 years as a policy advisor in three continents, he has focused on the field of twentieth century politics and history (Farwick, 2010). Mr. Laqueur stated that, “History shows that terrorism more often than not has little political impact, and that when it has an effect it is often the opposite of the one desired. (Laqueur, 1996).”
Victor Hanson of The National Review, discusses how “The invasion of Iraq was a perfect storm predicated on [many] suppositions”, many of which could have been avoided, he says. The two most pushed reasons for the invasion were the war on “terrorism” and the removal of Saddam Hussein (Hanson). Hussein was the seen as the epitome of corruption and therefore had to be removed. Senators from both parties and numerous world leader agreed with this reasoning. While many had other interests in the region, the “war on terror” was the international cover-up they all used (Henke 122).
Indeed, while still avoiding a ‘kitchen sink effect’ where anything could explain the insurgency, there is the need for a paradigm that illustrates the interplay between the different levels influencing the group: the local, the national, the international, but also the ethno-political and the religious