Rhetorical Analysis: The Use Of Non-Violence, By Cesar Chavez
Acclaimed activist and political leader, Cesar Chavez, in his article, attempts to convince the laboring class and those in need in America to restrain from any use of violence during their struggle. Throughout his article Chavez is able to maintain a predominantly straightforward positive tone in order to motivate his audience to lean more towards a non-violent approach to their problems. His purpose is to persuade the laboring class in America to abstain from any use of violence during their struggle. Chavez further elaborates his desire and purpose for his followers by utilizing the use of pathos and logos.
Chavez is in the mentality that nonviolence is the only way his followers- the rest of the labor union- will achieve their goals and abstain from any injuries or harm that could possibly happen to them. In order to elaborate upon this, he employs the use of pathos in hopes that they might be more cautious of taking a violent stance. According to the prompt Cesar states “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths…”.
…show more content…
Cesar uses historical information in order to present a scenario where the use of non-violence successfully worked in Gandhi’s protest. Chavez further elaborates upon his success by stating “The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” Chavez appeals to his audience’s reason by examining how Gandhi's nonviolent protest lead to his movements increased numbers and how it was “allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” he uses this appeal in order to reason with hi people that nonviolence will increase the success of their protest by increasing their
Analysis Of He Showed Us The Way By Cesar Chavez
154 Words | 1 PagesIn the excerpt “He Showed Us the Way” the author, Cesar Chavez, advocates nonviolence during a trying time is the true way to deal with struggles and injustices. First of all, Chavez explains Dr. King’s example is the right way to deal with struggling times that the colored faced. Human life is sacred and no one has any right to take violence toward another; in fact, violence does more damage in a situation then does nonviolence. Nonviolence is the way to accomplish justices morally and so much more powerful then violence. On the other hand, violence creates more violence and injustices.
How Did Cesar Chavez Contribute To The Labor Rights Movement
2039 Words | 9 PagesTo emphasize, Cesar Chavez encouraged the use of non-violence throughout his entire career as a labor rights movement leader and civil rights activist. As this strike “...from Delano to Sacramento…” progressed, they gathered “...support from outside the Central Valley, from other unions, church activists, students, Latinos and other minorities, and civil rights groups,” (Kim, 5-6). Despite the growing support gained by this movement, a few years into the strike, from 1967 to 1968, many strikers had become impatient and considered using violence. However, Cesar Chavez “...believed nonviolence is more powerful than violence…,” (Kim,
Chavez's Argument About Nonviolence Resistance
426 Words | 2 PagesWhat literary devices did Chavez really use for his argument about nonviolence resistance? Although Chavez uses a variety of literary terms, he uses Logos, the appeal to logic and senses, and aphorism, which is a belief that expresses a truth or principle of life. Chavez uses Logos to bring his point that violent protests not only take away or injure innocent people, but actually may end up hurting your cause in general as it can lower “morale” in those who do support your cause. It can also make those who wish to support your cause not to due to your idea’s violent reactions to your opposition and what they stand for. “If we resort to violence then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Assassination By Cesar Chavez
821 Words | 4 PagesIn Cesar Chavez’s article published on the tenth anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, he argues that nonviolent approaches to society’s moral and ethical dilemmas can make much more of an impact and end in better terms that work more favorably for the majority. Chavez supports his claim by describing the use violence to solve issues can result in severe consequences, implementing anaphora throughout his argument to make constant repetition of nonviolence stand out to the reader, and utilizing formal diction to make his advocation for nonviolent methods more appealing to the masses through direct explanation. The author’s purpose for writing this article is to highlight and incorporate his own views on non-violent strategies
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez
403 Words | 2 PagesEven ten years after Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered for his anti-racist actions, the battle against discrimination continued. As a civil rights activist, Cesar Chavez fights for workers’ rights. In his article, Cesar Chavez employs a convincing tone, contrasts, and allusions to convince his readers that nonviolent protest is the right way to create change in a community. Using this logos he has created, Chavez uses a convincing tone to sway his readers into agreeing with him. By stating that “nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect,” Chavez leaves no room for any argument with his strong word choice.
Writing: Nonviolent Protests By Cesar Chavez
1042 Words | 5 PagesCesar Chavez uses logical reasoning, logos, to explain why nonviolence will always work better than violence when trying to bring about change. This type of reasoning appeals to the audience’s intelligence, daring the reader to think over the logic of the argument, or a specific point in the argument. Chavez explains exactly why violent protests are wrong and why they can only end badly “If we resort to violence, then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers. ”(Chavez lines 17-21). Another point that he highlights later in the piece that resonates deeply, is that violence only creates more violence, a sentiment voiced by many nonviolence activists such as Pope Francis “Violence
Cesar Chavez My Faith In Action Summary
800 Words | 4 PagesThe Gospel of Cesar Chavez: My Faith in Action, by Mario T. Garcia, uses Cesar Chavez’s own words to express his spiritual and religious personality and how it led him to organize a movement for a change in the farm workers’ lifestyle of America. Through his experiences and observations with religion and spirituality growing up, Cesar created his own myth by conveying nonviolence and self-sacrifice as the basis of his American religious experience. Thus, paving the way towards reform for farm workers. To be able to understand Cesar’s motive behind his movement, violence and nonviolence needs to be distinguished. A violent movement is a protest that is set up to achieve a goal by using violent acts (riots, house raids, etc.).
Juxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech
662 Words | 3 PagesThe civil rights movement was a strong topic of discussion in politics during the mid-twentieth century. Martin Luther King Jr., one of the most influential leaders of the civil rights movement, was assassinated which caused many protests and calls for violence. In Cesar Chavez’s speech, he is telling the people that nonviolence resistance is the best way to go about the situation. Chavez’s uses juxtaposition, diction, and rhetorical appeals to strongly convey his argument about nonviolent resistance. To begin with, Chavez uses juxtaposition to contrast the effects of violent and nonviolent resistance.
Rhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez
786 Words | 4 PagesCesar Chavez, in his excerpt He showed us the Way, utilizes strong pathos, ethos and logos statements, precise diction, and valuable patterns of development to convey the power nonviolence has in fights for freedoms and rights. First, Chavez provides strong pathos, ethos and logos to convey the power nonviolent actions have to change the world for the better. He applies ethos to show that nonviolence is something that people are drawn to. In fact Chaves presents a great nonviolent advocate who lived during the segregation: “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolences brings...”
Rhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article
409 Words | 2 PagesIn a magazine article by Cesar Chavez on the 10th anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Chavez discusses the advantages of nonviolent resistance versus violent resistance, arguing that “nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” Chavez successfully develops his argument for nonviolent resistance by utilizing the rhetorical strategies of repetition and allusion. Chavez utilizes the rhetorical strategy of repetition throughout the article, repeating words like “nonviolent” and “we” to develop his and others’ stance on nonviolent resistance. Whenever Chavez states the word “nonviolent”, it is usually followed by its positive effects. For example, in the quote “nonviolence supports you if you have a just moral cause,” the word nonviolence is stated and is followed by its positive effect of supporting those with a righteous reasoning,
Cesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
651 Words | 3 PagesThe assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. devastated a large majority of people around the world. His works of nonviolent acts against racism motivated many, including civil rights activist Cesar Chavez, to solve matters without resorting to inhumane behaviors. Inspired by Dr. King Jr.’s work, Chavez and his union of labor workers devoted themselves to helping those in need through peaceful protests. Similar methods are proven to be successful; Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, gained a great deal of supporters because of his pacifism and tranquil methods of boycotting against British domination. Despite brutal and savage methods of persuasion slowly gaining support, Chavez proves that nonviolent actions are superior; he does so by using ethos in order to uphold moral standards, logos (in reference to the past), and pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience.
Cesar Chavez Research Paper
1309 Words | 6 PagesCesar Chavez History Day Project One Mexican American farm worker dedicated his days to better the lives of his people, his name was Cesar Chavez. Horrendous treatment of farmworkers caused Chavez to take a stand for what he believed in, for no one should be treated poorly because of race or social class. During Chavez’s life, he organized peaceful protests, boycotts, as well as participated in a historic 36 day "Fast for life". Chavez not only changed the working rights for farm workers but subsequently gave dignity to the working class of America. The legacy that Cesar Chavez left behind was that he became the most important leader of the Latino people in the United States, and he founded the still standing United Farmworkers of America.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech
845 Words | 4 PagesIn addition, referencing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the text further established Cesar Chavez’s ethos. King was someone who was revered by proponents of civil rights. Associating an audience with a prominent figure such as Dr. King adds to the credibility in the rhetor. Chavez uses the main persona of a human
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez
412 Words | 2 PagesThe audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of
Cesar Chavez Speech Essay
904 Words | 4 PagesA voice for the muzzled farm workers, a civil rights activist, outspoken about the unfair conditions migrant workers are faced, and inadequate wage given, Cesar Chavez speaks out in his Address in 1984 Commonwealth club of San Francisco. Chavez describes the injustice and unfair conditions farm workers confront on a daily basis, and what the farm workers, as a union the farm workers, must collaborate and do together in order to suppress the companies - growers - unfair conditions. In the speech, Chavez utilizes statistics, testimony, and repetition to not only win justice for the farm workers, but implement the urgent change that needs to happen in the eyes of Americans towards farm workers. The primary purpose of Chavez speech was to gain
More about Rhetorical Analysis: The Use Of Non-Violence, By Cesar Chavez
Analysis Of He Showed Us The Way By Cesar Chavez
154 Words | 1 PagesHow Did Cesar Chavez Contribute To The Labor Rights Movement
2039 Words | 9 PagesChavez's Argument About Nonviolence Resistance
426 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Assassination By Cesar Chavez
821 Words | 4 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Article By Cesar Chavez
403 Words | 2 PagesWriting: Nonviolent Protests By Cesar Chavez
1042 Words | 5 PagesCesar Chavez My Faith In Action Summary
800 Words | 4 PagesJuxtaposition In Cesar Chavez Speech
662 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of The Power Of Violence By Cesar Chavez
786 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Article
409 Words | 2 PagesCesar Chavez Ethos Pathos Logos
651 Words | 3 PagesCesar Chavez Research Paper
1309 Words | 6 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Cesar Chavez Speech
845 Words | 4 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez
412 Words | 2 PagesCesar Chavez Speech Essay
904 Words | 4 Pages