Moral choice is choosing to do something that you believe is right or good, it is a choice made based on ethics, manners, character and what one believes is right or wrong. The book, ‘After the Lights Go Out’ written by Lili Wilkinson is a book that explores ideas with moral choices, this is demonstrated by the quotes; “‘You could’ve warned them’ I say, ‘They could’ve got out’... ‘Everyone made their choice, I chose to survive.’”-Pru, Page 296, this quote uses juxtaposition, the author places two things together for a contrasting effect. Another quote demonstrating moral choice is “But she's right. We can’t leave Dad behind with his paranoia and fear. Can we?”-Pru, Page 307, this demonstrates rhetorical questions, a question made for dramatic …show more content…
It doesn’t make you a good guy.”-Pru, Page 310, this uses colloquialism, a phrase that is not formal or literary or is used in ordinary or familiar conversations. The quote “But she’s right. We can’t leave Dad behind with his paranoia and fear. Can we?” This rhetorical question encourages the audience to think about what is morally correct, it shows that Pru second-guesses herself because a part of her believes that her family would be better off without Rick. It shows how a choice made by others can impact your life and accordingly, what will happen to you because of what they believe would be better off. The quote “‘You could’ve warned them’ I say, ‘They could’ve got out’... ‘Everyone made their choice, I chose to survive.’” Shows that Pru wanted Rick to make a choice, but he had already made a selfish choice that she does not morally agree with. These quotes make the reader learn that moral choice differs from person to person, it shows that while Pru wanted to do what was correct for the town, Rick wanted to do what was right for him, nevertheless, others will agree with one of them depending on what they personally believe is
This decision has caused many discrepancies among his mother’s family and that of his father’s. The tone affects the style of the story because the author discusses more philosophical ideas and rather than utilizing concrete ideas, he uses abstract
Throughout the novel the father's love for his son pushes him to protect him no matter the risks. For example in the novel many times the two would go to an abandoned house
Where are we going? Where is my family? When will I see them again?” This shows how not having his family there affects him because he can’t stop thinking about them, which can make him upset and then weaker and
The audience is likely to be convinced by the author's rhetorical approach because she develops credibility since she has experience on how it feels not being able to connect with a parent but at the end of the day being able to perceive through the challenge and eventually getting along with her father and no longer seeing him as an adversary but more as an accomplice with her father. 2) The tone of the author is appropriate to the audience because she is enthusiastic about trying to get along with her father even though they are almost exact opposites. In the story you never hear the main character say you know what I give up on my father we are never going to get along I hate my life. No but what the main character does do is that she gets out of her way to try to have a deeper relationship with her father.
Do you understand”(113). The man has to put the boy in a position that nobody should ever have to be in. Death is always an option to them and this is a constant reminder.
A choice is an act of selecting or making a decision when faced with two or more possibilities. But choices aren’t just a definition, they are life’s biggest challenges. Choices can be as big as life or death, but as small as what to eat for supper. They are just a part of everyday life. Everybody has to make choices, even characters in stories have to make choices, like Marilyn from Cold Equations, Jean from The Nothing, and Miss Geiss from This Year’s Class Picture.
This strategy can be used to persuade an audience because of the logical appeal. The speaker states, “Nevertheless I am, legally, Sophie’s father, and I have certain fundamental obligations, the main one being to protect her from harm, with “harm” defined as “men.”. This statement appeals to an audience that may experience the same goals as a parent, especially a father. This statement essentially attempts to persuade the audience by making a reasonable claim and offering proof in support of that claim throughout the rest of the article. The main argument about parenting in Where Did My Little Girl Go?, is that he as a parent has certain duties over his daughter, and that he is the one responsible for protecting her.
"You can't even look me in the face, can you?" (Carver 331.) When the mother says this the readers assume the dad has been unfaithful in someway. This is why he is leaving. In Today Will Be a Quiet Day the father is mature and loves his children. "
The author continuously relies on a series of factual events that relate to what her particular arguments are. She attempts to prove to the reader that acting because of moral authority is what brings some of the biggest changes in society today. She states, “There are as many reasons to hope as to fear a new disappointment…” (pg.899) demonstrating to the reader than a protesters’ actions will not always result in a positive outcome. The style chosen by the author suits her purpose of giving the reader a clear view on what moral authority is and how it can impact the
Children talk about how their parents abandoned them and left them behind. For instance, Enrique states, “I wouldn’t be this way if I had two parents” (198).Enrique tells his mother that he acts this way because both of his parents were never in his life. Enrique acts out because his parents are not in his life . He says that if his parents were in his life, then he would of never choose to sniff glue or join a gang before he reconnected with his mother. Also, Enrique says to his mother that “You long ago lost the right to tell me what to do” (198).
to still keep established pace and tone, which is that calm, disassociated mood. At this point the father, the reader might think, is a construction of the husband’s mind, because the husband had focused on “the idea of never seeing him again. . . .” which struck him the most out of this chance meeting, rather than on the present moment of seeing him (Forn 345). However surreal this may be in real life, the narrator manages to keep the same weight through the pacing in the story to give this story a certain realism through the husband’s
“‘I don’t think you’d better consider it any more, Father.’ ‘I won’t have any threats from my son!’ ‘Very well.’ And Peter strolled off to the nursery.”
McCarthy writes the father’s internal dialogue, “Could you crush that beloved skull with a rock?” (McCarthy 114).This strongly emotional imagery inside the father’s head not only represents the father killing his son but also suggest that the father has a detailed plan. Once again, this shows how far people will go and change when they are under extreme circumstances. This also shows how widespread these kinds of changes are in humans. The good guys too, need to take extreme measures when they are faced with no other
Stories are the foundation of relationships. They represent the shared lessons, the memories, and the feelings between people. But often times, those stories are mistakenly left unspoken; often times, the weight of the impending future mutes the stories, and what remains is nothing more than self-destructive questions and emotions that “add up to silence” (Lee. 23). In “A Story” by Li-Young Lee, Lee uses economic imagery of the transient present and the inevitable and fear-igniting future, a third person omniscient point of view that shifts between the father’s and son’s perspective and between the present and future, and emotional diction to depict the undying love between a father and a son shadowed by the fear of change and to illuminate the damage caused by silence and the differences between childhood and adulthood perception. “A Story” is essentially a pencil sketch of the juxtaposition between the father’s biggest fear and the beautiful present he is unable to enjoy.
In Carol Gilligan 's essay, "Concepts of Self and Morality," a college student answers the question of what morality should be by stating, "The basic idea that I cling to is the sanctity of human life" (171). When a woman decides to have an abortion, she overlooks the sanctity of human life and she forgets her morals. Therefore there should not be a question of choice in the matter of