In chapter seven of The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins discusses morality is not, in fact, rooted in religion, rather a part of a “changing moral Zeitgeist,” as the chapter title suggests. Throughout the chapter, Dawkins provides evidence from the New and Old Testaments to show the immorality of religion and how it is impossible that morals were a result of religion. Though constructive, Dawkins’ arguments fall weak to some extent. Firstly, he fails to define morality clearly, as it can be subjective
In The God Delusion Debate, one of the strength that I discovered from Professor Richard Dawkins is he presented his arguments in a very convincing form. As he stands for sciences, which needed evidence to proof his statements, his theory and arguments were more logical. Therefore, his arguments were more convincible compared to Dr. John Lennox. For instance, from first thesis of the debate, which is about faith is blind and God is an illusion, Professor Richard Dawkins persuaded that when people
Chong Marn Hoe Fernando Chow Lim Jee Yan, Amelia Mr Adriel Wong PHI 101 29 October 2014 The God Delusion Debate PART ONE: For 'The God Delusion' debate analysis, Chong Marn Hoe and Fernando Chow chose to listen to Professor John Lennox. Chong Marn Hoe is a theist and is interested to see how someone who is intellectually more capable in defending his faith in a debate setting. This can widen his perspective on things and help him to think critically when challenged by others too. Fernando chose
Introduction: Professors Richard Dawkins and John Lennox go head to head in a battle to match their superior intellect. The debate was titled “Has Science Buried God?” Lennox also announced his new book “Gods Undertaker”. The John Lennox - Richard Dawkins Debate - bethinking.org. 2015 Lennox is a popular Christian apologist and scientist who goes everywhere around the world to speak of the interface between science and religion. Also like Dawkins he pursued his lifetime career of science. But Lennox