During the Elizabethan times, citizens were governed by conscience and justice. Sins were punished by divine justice, and past vendettas were not forgiven or forgotten. Therefore, Shakespeare highlights vengeance and punishment as the prevalent themes in the play, King Richard III. None of the characters are innocent in the War of the Roses, and Shakespeare plans to deliver them to justice. As one who has suffered the fall of power, Queen Margaret symbolizes consequence, or repercussion. In lines 186 to 231 of Act I Scene iii, she relieves all the wrongdoings that the Yorkist have done to her. This includes King Edward IV, Queen Elizabeth, Rivers, Hastings, Dorset, and Richard. Earlier in the scene, Richard describes all the unjust acts she …show more content…
This is her response to their unified accusations. There is an implied metaphor; ‘snarling’ is what she uses to compare all the characters in the room to animals. This gives a sense that she feels the characters are beastial in nature. She uses rhetorical questions to emphasizes her hatred for the nobles and the positions they are now. “Did York’s dread curse prevail so much with heaven/That Henry’s death, my Lovely Edward’s death/Their kingdom’s loss, my woeful banishment/Could all but answer for that peevish brat?” By asking these question in a rhetorical way, Margaret demands their recognition for her loss of power, due to killing Rutland. Here she represents the wheel of fortune, as well as the consequences of civil war between members of the royal family. The next line, “Can curses pierce the clouds and enter heaven?” also accentuate the power of cursing and language. Margaret uses a metaphor to compare curses to spears or weapons that can physically pierce armour—in this case the clouds of heaven—and seems to realize now that when Richard’s father cursed her, she has felt the results of her sin. By wondering rhetorically, she gives a sense of curiosity to whether curses may actually come …show more content…
“Thou elvish-marked, abortive, rooting hog” uses asyndeton to give the effect of unpremeditated multiplicity to the her insults to him, as well as climax to add a crescendo to her insults to him in parallel to her growing hatred. She believes there is something supernatural about him as well, as if he had been cast a spell by some evil fairies, and uses a metaphor ‘rooting hog’ to describe his lack of intelligence to see the bigger picture instead of what is ahead. She continues on the theme that he is being manipulated by a greater force: “Thou that wast sealed in thy nativity/The slave of nature and the son of hell.” She uses an implied metaphor ‘sealed’ insult him with the fact that it was his birth that drove him to do such evil acts, and she uses hyperboles to emphasizes his lack of choice to his evil deeds because it is in his nature, and also because he was born to the son of hell, all of of which are an extended metaphor, on her comparison of his lack of choice to his evil character, emphasizing his insult to him being used by a some greater power that he is unintelligent enough to realize. She then uses more implied metaphors: “Thou slander of thy heavy mother’s womb/Thou loathèd issue of thy father’s loins.” This implies that even his
The author uses revenge as a clear theme, specifically in the ending of the book The Roundhouse. Joe takes revenge on his mother's attacker by killing him with the help of his best friend Cappy. Although revenge was accomplished in Joe’s mind, it did not make the characters, such as Joe and Cappy, feel any better about their situation. However, after he and Cappy, had committed the deed, they did not feel happy, it wasn't a sweet revenge at all as they both had haunting nightmares of his mother's attacker in their dreams. They are both afraid and insecure after their kill and felt nervous around almost everyone.
n the book The Count of Monte Cristo takes revenge against the people who ruined his life as Edmond Dantes and uses different types of strategies depending on their weakness. The Count disguises himself as an Abbe and returns to find Caderousse still as a poor man. On page 110 it says “So saying , he the diamond from his pocket and handed it to Caderousse. “Take this, my friend.” he said, “it's yours” “What! for me alone?” cried Caderousse.
Josie Pharoah Ms. Czajkowski English 9 Due date: 3/12/23 Serpent King's Argumentative Essay In the novel The Serpent King by Jeff Zentner, we are introduced to a character named Lydia. Lydia is displayed as a hardworking and motivated person. But as the novel progresses she proves not to be a good friend to the other characters.
The play The Tragedy of King Richard III by WIlliam Shakespeare explores the idea of retributive justice, the idea that criminals should be punished as opposed to rehabilitated, through Richard and his victims. Due to retributive justice, all of Richard’s victims receive precisely what they deserve, as Richard had the full consent of each of his victims the entire time he was manipulating and controlling them. An obvious example of this then, is Anne. She willingly went along with Richard’s plans for her own selfish reason, only later to be killed off when she outlived her purpose to Richard. An infinitesimal instance embodies itself through Hastings.
There are an infinite number of reasons someone would seek revenge. The characters Abigail Williams, Ann Putnam, and Thomas Putnam all seek revenge for various reasons in Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible. First, Abigail Williams becomes vengeful toward Elizabeth Proctor, the wife of her former lover John Proctor. Abigail believes Elizabeth “...is blackening my name in the village...is telling lies about me!”
In “The Crucible”, Arthur Miller presents a city named Salem, with contradicting people. Throughout the story people accuse others of being witches or being involved with witchcraft so they could be hanged. Miller presents the idea that vengeance ruins people’s lives or reputation so that you can get what you want and be satisfied. Some people take revenge to protect themselves; they are scared of what would happen to them but they still do it or in this case, they accuse.
By doing this, the vindictive Putnam gains land like others do too to their advantage. Abigail, Putnam, and other characters from The Crucible find the witch trials beneficial. The jealous Abi finds her way out of trouble by accusing other people. With this power in hand, she attacks Elizabeth with accusation because of her lingering jealousy and lust for Proctor. Meanwhile, the vindictive Putnam who regards himself superior of most of the people around him, is thirsty for land and power.
She did the forbidden act of witchcraft in the forest with Tituba and the other girls. Not to mention, Abigail was trying to kill Elizabeth Proctor in the process. To do so, Abigail drank blood in the forest and the other girls saw her, then, Betty exclaimed, “You drank blood, Abby! You
When Abigail is accused of witchcraft, she confesses and in order to take blame off of herself, she accuses many others as well. This sparks hysteria and conflict in the society that ends up costing people their lives. Many characters play a part in the outcomes in the story, however, some do so with more impact. Women in The Crucible are able to take power in their society as they find ways to influence and manipulate those in authority.
Lady Macbeth in the beginning of the play is manipulative, most of the times she manipulates her husband into doing either what she wants or what she thinks he should do. For example, when Macbeth does not want to kill Duncan anymore, Lady Macbeth convinces him by saying “from this time such I account thy love. Art thou afeared to be the same in thine own act and valor as thou art in desire? (I.vii line 38-41). Besides, the audience see Lady Macbeths is influencing her husband’s feelings by she is using her love as a weapon because she is saying do it
Revenge: A Taste of His Own Medicine A Tale of Two Cities is largely comprised of ideas from the French Revolution and the challenges faced by the people involved in it. The French Revolution involves many uprisings by the lower class because of poor conditions and inequity among the people. Charles Dickens demonstrates this injustice through the peasants of St. Antoine and gives insight of their feelings and motives towards the aristocracy. In fact, the peasants use their motives to plan evil conspiracies as revenge for the aristocrats.
In the play The Crucible, character such as Abigail and Thomas Putnam seek revenge from others, so much so that it becomes and recurring theme throughout the play. The theme of revenge can best be shown through the characters Abigail Williams, Thomas Putnam, and Giles Corey. Abigail Williams, one of the main characters in the play, becomes one to the biggest contenders for the theme of revenge. It is revealed in the beginning of the play that Abigail has committed adultery with John Proctor. This becomes the root of the revenge because Abigail now thinks that “there is promise in such sweat.”
Elizabeth is the victim of Abigail’s heartless actions and affair. These two women are almost complete opposites. Both characters struggle and fight through the story in their own ways. Abigail is the villain in this play.
Instead, he flaunts his villainy as he manipulates Anne into wedding him “in her heart’s extremist hate,” tricks characters into believing him “a saint when most [he] play[s] the devil,” and is victoriously crowned King Richard (I.ii.251, I.iii.358). Richard’s conscience is suppressed until Act V, Scene iii, when he is literally confronted with his heinous deeds by the ghosts, an experience which, as agreed by Lansky, prevents him from continuing to suppress his conscience as it “is actively and unmistakably reproaching him” (129). Immediately after being confronted by the ghosts, having finally faced his crimes, Richard cries out, “O coward conscience, how dost thou afflict me!” and recognizes his actions as wrong, asking “Is there a murderer here?” only to answer with “Yes, I am,” admitting that he “rather hate[s]” himself for committing his “hateful deeds” (V.iii.191-202).
“I’m sorry m’dear. Boudreaux and I were talking about old times and I simply forgot myself - we should not speak of such things in front of you.” “You were just speaking plenty on the Baroness and her misadventures, now you want to worry of my delicate ears- please, tell me of this ‘pleasure palace’,” I implored. “Is it a house of ill-repute?” I asked bluntly, looking first to one then the other.