The first paragraph, which displays the corrupted morality of the judge, establishes these descriptions as false, indicating the sarcastic tone of the narrator. Addressing the audience, the narrator implores his readers to recognize the true character of Pyncheon, rather than accepting the facade of morality, indicated by the use of “you” in question form. This sarcastic question, emphasize by the use of exclamation, reveals the narrator’s point as obvious. After spending the entire opening
Tobias also uses Syntax to emphasize the unimportance and futile message. In his final sentence I laughed out loud conveys that, Wolff believes these demands are nonsensical and meaningless by keeping this sentence short and using simple punctuation. These connotations develop
In order for me to legally defend my recommendation, I have to show her recommendation for dismissal had no underlying connection to the protected activity and it is reasonable under the circumstances. This could be done by providing proof that a reduction in force was needed; as well as, data showing she was the best choice for the
1) The thesis is that language is an instrument which we can shape however we want to meet our purposes. 2) He states that because writing is a tool, politicians have seemed to molded it to their designs; therefore convincing people of certain actions. 3) The process of poor writing and thinking is reversible. Clear genuine language, will support clear thinking. According to him, the most common characteristic in political writing is staleness.
Everywhere we look there is some form of bullshit going around and according to Professor Frankhurt, bullshitting is a more serious threat than lying. In his essay he talks about the many concepts of bullshit from his own perspective and compares bullshit to other related topics such as “Humbug” and “Lying”, and then breaks the words down to a basic understanding to help find a true meaning of . His use of definitions and in depth analysis, makes his essay very effective in describing buullshit. It seems that his main concerns pertain to what bullshit is. In On Bullshit, to further convey his argument, he includes definitions from the Oxford English Dictionary itself to further prove that they are “pertinent to clarifying the nature of bullshit.”
I believe that I probably would have done better on the question about specialized terms, but that wasn’t the case. In response to my question, the best way to answer it was to make reference to the essay and what Hancock did to maintain an objective and logical tone. Ultimately, in order to maintain an objective tone, there should be no use of personal pronouns in the essay and there should be a presentation of data, facts, and even some specialized
I noticed that Kingsolver use the idea of language to demonstrate the distinct character. For example Rachel consistently misuses of words reveals a lot about her character. In book three looking at the last paragraph of one section where Rachel says, “But I won’t tell her. I prefer to remain anomalous” (270). In this line Rachel probably meant to say, “I prefer to remain anonymous.” But instead she misuses the word anomalous.
On vocabulary King asserts that its best to use the first word that comes to our mind. However, he cautions not to use long words just for the sake of using long words. Of grammar he reminds us that, "bad grammar produces bad sentences." One of the things that stood out to me was his statement, "I 'm convinced that fear is at the root of most bad writing." King 's writing style is active and direct.
I literally had to stop myself from commenting. I would say that errors like hers are one of my biggest pet peeves. So, when searching for quotes I didn’t have to look any further when I found one by Jeffrey Gitomer. It reads “Your grammar is a reflection of your image. Good or bad, you have made an impression.
In article “A Plagiarism Pentimento” the author Rebecca Moore Howard represent a debate statement argument on a topic of frequent appearance of plagiarism. She believes that the guidelines provided suggestion in responding to plagiarism in any type of methods. In her deep researcher for corroboration in plagiarism she acknowledge that “patchwriting” should be complete in the correct proper format of using author’s passages in quotations, paraphrasing main ideas of original sources in your own words, and citing in safe conditions all figures. She does not agree that “patchwriting” should be counted as action of plagiarism. Rebecca also points out that summary-writing of original text not only be leaned and comprehend but also should be examine
“You and Samuel Clemens are the opposite of each other. Whereas Clemens wrote with terrible grammar to show Toms and Hucks verbal skills, you write with a great command of the English language. “However, you talk like a southern hick.” He went on to explain that though my reading and writing skills were well established my verbal skills were severely impeded. And that to be taken serious I needed to work on speaking as well as I wrote. He then asked me about my major and minor.
However, researchers believe that the abbreviation spelling of text messages is essentially related with better literacy skills. Textism signify bad grammar, capitalizations getting ignored, there are no signs of apostrophe, and run on sentences comes into place. Kenagh kemp and her colleagues at Coventry University in Britain, Clare Wood and Sam Waldron