Name and Date of Case
Rubin Carter Case
June 17, 1966
Initial Description
In 1966, police arrested Rubin Carter and his friend John Artis for a triple homicide committed in the Lafayette Bar and Grill in Paterson, New Jersey. These two men were described as, “two negroes in a white car”, an extremely racist description. Police stopped Carter’s car and brought him and Artis to the crime scene. Upon searching the vehicle, the police found ammunition that fit the weapons used in the murder. Police took no fingerprints at the scene of the crime and lacked the equipment needed to conduct a paraffin test for gunshot residue.
Police Investigation
Alfred Bello was an eyewitness near the Lafayette on the night of the triple homicide. He gave
…show more content…
Brown. Brown’s strategy was to focus on inconsistencies in some of the descriptions given by Willie Marins and Alfred Bello. The defense produced a number of witnesses who testified that Carter and Artis had been in the Nite Spot (a nearby bar) at the time of the shooting. Both men were convicted. Prosecutors sought the death penalty, but jurors recommended that each defendant received a life sentence. In 1974, Bello confessed that he had previously lied about his testimony and blaming it on the fact that he had received “special treatment” from the police. In 1976, this information became available to the general public and the New Jersey State Supreme Court ruled in favor of Carter and Artis. However, after 6 months, they were convicted again for a second trial when Bello reversed his …show more content…
Once the police heard that two black men had done the shooting, they instantly became bias. The first two men they found that fit the criteria of the killers were automatically guilty to the police because of their race. There was very minimal evidence that led them to believe Carter and Artis were guilty, yet they spent their whole life in jail for it anyway. Habeus Corpus was the biggest miscarriage of justice in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt. The police had no reason to arrest or detain the men, all they had was the colour of their car and the colour of their
Earlier this week, Wade Jamison was fatally shot in his home. The people who are allegedly responsible for this horrific crime are Melvin Simms, R.W. Simms, and Harlan Granger. The Simms brothers carried out the crime, while Mr. Granger paid them a large sum of money to do so. It is thought that the brothers broke into Mr. Jamison’s house around 1:00 A.M. Wednesday morning and tried to shoot Mr. Jamison while he was sleeping. When Mr. Jamison woke up and fought back, the Simms brothers fatally shot him with the gun that T.J. Avery allegedly stole from the Barnetts.
The police arrested Rubin Carter and John Artis because they fit the description given by Alfred Bello after the Lafayette Bar shooting. Their first right that was violated was “Detention or imprisonment” section 9 “Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.” John Artis and Rubin Carter were arrested for being “2 black men in a white car” as said by the policeman who detained them. The second right that was violated was “Arrest or detention” section 10 (a) “Everyone has the right on arrest or detention; (a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;” Carter and Artis were not informed promptly of the reason of their detention, in fact, when they were detained both men were taken to the hospital for the surviving
Mrs. Davis said Mr. Davis told her to turn off the light and to go to sleep. Mrs. Davis said she lay down on the couch and was dozing off when she heard a gunshot which she believed came from outside the residence. Mrs. Davis said she got up to check on Mr. Davis and found the gun on his chest, which she stated he always kept next to the bed. Mrs. Davis said she tried to communicate with Mr. Davis but he was unresponsive. Mrs. Davis said she then called her daughter, Tiffany, who contacted the Sheriff's
The Walther P-38 was found coated in dirt along with unknown oil matter. They couldn’t recover fingerprints from the weapon nor could they make out the serial number because it had been filed down. Furthermore, the night of the murder Blake was carrying a registered .38 Special Smith and Wesson revolver so when he was tested for gunshot residue his defense argued that the powder could have been from the revolver he was carrying, not from the murder weapon.
Another layer of white supremacy was in the courts as Assata was being charged for bank robbery and kidnapping, which seem to be a stage theater to give the illusion of a fair trial when in fact it was just another tool to continue to subjugate African American. The bank robbery case was suspicious when the F.B.I. started to fingerprint and took photographs of Assata in the same clothing as the bank robbers and at the same angle. However, what got the case, postpone was the judge and his inability to contain his prejudice saying that he thought Assata was guilty and when the case resumed still were not able to get a conviction. The other case of the kidnapping of the drug dealer (James freeman), which quickly fell apart when Freeman testify and was asked if he was being coerce to frame Assata, he
“During the peaceful protest in effort to get justice for Freddie Grey’s murder a riot broke out. Raymon Carter committed arson against the CVS store and is now facing prison.” (Jedra) The government did not make Ray Carter commit the crime. However they are disrespecting the African
Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite
The prosecutors in the Wayne Williams case presented evidence and witnesses in the case. None of the witnesses, in this case, witnessed Wayne Williams commit any murders. The witnesses were there to testify about what they noticed Wayne Williams do, that was not normal or unusual. The testimony which was the most damaging was Angelo Foster who was a former press secretary to the mayor. He gave information about a conversation that he had with the defendant’s father.
In my opinion, I believe the jury selection process was conducted fairly and the final jurors selected to serve during the trial were selected properly, however I can also understand the defense’s concerns. Unfortunately, many people are unable to set their personal biases aside when it comes to race. People allow the skin color or religious beliefs of the accused, or the heinousness of the crime to cloud their judgement of the truth rather than let the evidence and witness testimony tell what really
The Murder Trial of Biggie Smalls Rathbone, William Unit 7 Assignment CJ 101 Wallace Biggie was one of the most powerful rappers before getting murdered in drive by shooting in March of 1997. At time he was killed the police had many theories of why he got murdered on that day. The police had multiple suspects about who did it but wasn’t sure of who or why they murdered Biggie Smalls. On that day Biggie was on his way to the hotel from the music party. When his SUV came up to the stop light, he could hear someone call his name, so he rolled his back window down to see who that’s when he was shot multiple times in the torso and then the suspects drove away from the murder.
Jay came in months later to talk about what happened that day and he owned up to being an assist to murder. I feel that he should have gotten some time in jail because he claims to have been there at the scene and helped to bury Hae. When Jay started getting heavily questioned he had a very guilty tone of voice to himself. His voice dimmed down and then raised to an almost yell. I could almost place the reactions
They just wanted justice for the jogger but they never thought of the people on the other side of this case because there was a chance that they could have been guilty. Wilder stated that “these were five kids who we tormented, we falsely accused, we pilloried in the press, we attacked, we invented phrases for the imagined crimes that we’re accusing them of”
In the Heat Of the Night Throughout the movie racial tensions are high, the attitude of whites in Mississippi towards African Americans. The movie follows Virgil Tibbs a black detective who is hired for a murder investigation in a town in Mississippi. Gillespie is the new chief in town who leads the investigation. Tibbs is arrested in the train station as a suspect for murder.
Evers had several witnesses against him and Beckworth denied it. He said that the gun was stolen and produced several witnesses to testify that he was elsewhere on the night of the
OJ became the prime suspect of their murders. This case is well known to this day for many reasons, including the LAPD’s tampering with evidence. One way the LAPD ignored the law is when they entered OJ’s home without talking to OJ, and without a search warrant. This resulted in an illegal search where the evidence that was found would not be admissible in court.