Rind's Argument Analysis
Rind’s article was created to give readers an understanding of the Sun’s role in climate variations. The hypothesis suggested that there are multiple other climate forcing factors which work with the sun to create climate changes. Rind’s evidence presented in the paper focused on many important aspects, referring to not just modern factors which affected climate systems but also those that were present millions of years ago during the ice ages. While Rind presents information on both past and current events, she also addressed how our past ideas of how climate change worked were inaccurate. Furthermore, Rind backed up statements with several different collections of modern scientific data enabling her to compare and contrast what actually happened and what should have happened. My opinion towards Rind’s article is positive, she backs up each claim with reliable scientific data and expresses each climate forcing factor accurately while continuing to reference how those 5 factors influence the energy coming to earth from the sun. …show more content…
In contrast, her article would not be as helpful for readers with no background in climate change, I have previously taken several courses which provided me the necessary knowledge to understand the information presented on the datasets and diagrams, other readers may be unable to do
Jan Rindfleisch's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesJan Rindfleisch support her argument by pointing out that minorities do in fact, make up half of the population in the state of California. She further backs her argument by expressing that it isn’t fair, nor does it make sense to have museums and galleries to specifically generate private clubs and exhibitions just to display an “ethnic-only” show. She hints that, that is whitewashing, ostracizing, and completely racist to the minority population. Rindfleisch then articulates that “Art is a visual communication,” and to isolate half of California’s population, it literally means that that visual communication is being impeded. The author finally then refers to how art illustrates one’s self, their values, and how it is reflected back to an
CNS Analyzing Nasa's 'A Blanket Around The World'
1346 Words | 6 PagesThe article created of which is supported by Nasa, tries to make it clear to the general audience that the issue of climate change is real. Nasa being rated to be factual high on the biased scale can be trusted as it favors no political side, making their articles based on scientific evidence. The article opens up stating “Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect” A strongpoint of which this article has would be its ability to inform the average viewer about the issue of climate change. Due to this article being supported by Nasa, a pro-science website, this source can be trusted as this article would be backed up by the scientific theory. Comparing to the article created by CNN which backs the creation of “synthetic trees”; Nasa’s article would be meant to inform the reader, however, due to CNN’s political biased towards the liberals, the average viewer may see the article only favor the political view due to the biased.
Summary Of Apocalypse Soonish By Kevin Williamson
1533 Words | 7 PagesHe pulls quotes from Benjamin Strauss, the vice president for Climate Central who has “a Ph.D. in ecology and evolutionary biology from Princeton”(Williamson 2) and Rob Painting, a “true believer who writes for Skeptical Science”(2) who is simply “a former police officer who is really, really interested in global warming” (3). While Strauss is more qualified to speak on behalf of the science behind climate change, the leading climatologists of the world are nowhere to be seen. Instead, Williamson uses these two, less credible, sources to drive his point of opposition further and more
Russel Vought Argument Analysis
750 Words | 3 PagesIn this article, the senator Bernie Sanders had a strong debate with the nominee to deputy by the president donald trump, russel Vought; about a post made by russel bought in 2016 implying that the Islamic community did not know Christ, and that's why they were going to be condemned. What Sanders considered discriminatory towards the Islamic community, and unleashed a long debate that had nothing to do with the current topic which was relevant to Russell's role in government. This discussion caused controversy because Senator Bernie Sanders was accused by some people of violating article IV of the constitution. This is a very complex issue because the statements made by Vought can be taken in many different ways because they are related to
Chick On Climate Change Summary
450 Words | 2 PagesBut we have satellites keeping a close eye on the sun, and it has not changed nearly enough to be the culprit.” The strategy he goes with is taking the other side and immediately denies it with facts that benefits his point more than the opposing one. Although, Cynthia Tucker’s “Climate Change Looms More Terrifying Than Any Fiction” uses a bunch of stellar evidence, like “A 10-year-old boy visiting from Missouri with his family was killed in a freak accident on an Alabama beach in June when he was struck by a log that had been thrown ashore by a storm surge. ” There seems to be a lack of counter arguments that could’ve boosted her evidence even more and propel her work to greatness.
Review: Can US States And Cities Overcome Paris Exit By Warren Cornwall
1671 Words | 7 PagesThese articles help with building the picture that climate change is agreed upon everyone that it is an urgent and real thing is in of
Ap Human Geography Chapter 1 Study Guide
1722 Words | 7 PagesChanges occurring in the sun itself can affect the climate change on Earth. The intensity of the sunlight reaching the Earth can cause either warming or cooling. The sun flows a natural 11 year cycle of small ups and downs in intensity, but the effect of it on the Earth’s climate is negligible. However, over the past years, the sun’s intensity has been lower than the mid 20th century, and therefore does not explain the recent warming of the Earth. • Also
Rutland Argument Analysis
261 Words | 2 PagesAs standing armies were marching along the debate floor another issue was power of state authority over Federal authority. This clash in authority came from the juiced up legislatures which were often extremely powerful under the Articles. Considered by Rutland as ”a loose, incomplete agreement”, the issue for Anti-Federalists was the weak powerful government was morphing into an aristocratic system. Rutland points out a few words from George Mason, who believed the Constitution “Would erect at the outset a moderate aristocracy. Which would evolve into either a monarchy or a corrupt, tyrannical aristocracy”(42)and called on the hatred of monarchy by local people.
Simard's Argument Analysis
62 Words | 1 PagesThe argument is convincing to readers based on the quality of evidence the writer provides to support her argument. Simard cites verifiable and credible pieces of evidence to substantiate her claim, these include studies on implicit stereotype from three different world-renowned universities, research study by a leading non-governmental organization against stereotype threat, cross-national comparison study on STEM, and the writer’s personal experience
Tump's Argument Analysis
597 Words | 3 PagesIn his mind all he sees is himself, he makes decisions based on how it will make him look and feel. He acts in a way not a leader would act more like the way an adolescent would act. He has nothing but selfish things on his mind and in his future. The question is fire him from his position or promote him, do we give him more of the power, or do we give him a goodbye and have a nice day? Logic says tell him a nice day and fire him but the public says he has my vote.
Summary Of Why Bother By Michael Pollan
722 Words | 3 PagesAlmost anyone who will read this essay has undoubtedly heard of the climate phenomenon Global warming. Global warming is a topic that gets discussed very often nowadays, most notably during political debate and discussion. Politicians use certain stances on global warming to appeal to voter’s emotions and logic in order to gain votes and support for their campaign, however climate change is nothing new, during the past several hundred thousand years the Earth has heated up and cooled down and even experienced so called “ice ages”, which is a period where glacial deposits located at the northern and southern hemispheres have grown due to dramatic global cool downs. Don’t be confused by climate terminology though, the global warming so widely
Ben Robert-Smith's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesIn Ben Robert-Smith’s opinion piece published in the Herald Sun on the 16th of January, 2017 “We Are One but We Are Many”, Robert- Smith addresses he Addresses the Australian public with the argument that is changing the date of Australia day from January 26th. He argues that the date should remain the same but should be undertaken in a manner that is “inclusive and respectful” of other Australian’s interpretation of the day. Comparatively, in Kevin V. Russell’s Letter to the Editor he presents the argument from an alternate perspective.
Paul Bogard's Argument Analysis
117 Words | 1 PagesIn his argumentative essay, Paul Bogard uses literacy diction and allusions to give credibility to his argument. By using words like Van Gogh, “Starry night sky”, and given. These words evoke a feeling of recollection. Also using the words van Gogh, Paul gives his paper further credibility all while persuading the audience to be on his side. Furthermore Paul also uses imagery in his argument to evoke a feeling of both sadness and a feeling of missing out.
Francione's Argument Analysis
1001 Words | 5 PagesIn Debater Francione’s argument considering the Andre Robinson Case, A man who callously kicked a cat for laughs, Francione says that intentionally harming an animal is no different from killing an animal for eating purposes. And those that eat meat are practically the same as people who abuse animals on purpose. I disagree with Francione’s view. Eating meat does not make you an immoral person. Yes, Andre Robinson, the man in question, shouldn’t have kicked the cat like he did and he should not have shamelessly danced afterwards, but him kicking a cat is not the same as someone going to Whataburger and eating a bacon cheeseburger for lunch.
More about Rind's Argument Analysis
Jan Rindfleisch's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesCNS Analyzing Nasa's 'A Blanket Around The World'
1346 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of Apocalypse Soonish By Kevin Williamson
1533 Words | 7 PagesRussel Vought Argument Analysis
750 Words | 3 PagesChick On Climate Change Summary
450 Words | 2 PagesReview: Can US States And Cities Overcome Paris Exit By Warren Cornwall
1671 Words | 7 PagesAp Human Geography Chapter 1 Study Guide
1722 Words | 7 PagesRutland Argument Analysis
261 Words | 2 PagesSimard's Argument Analysis
62 Words | 1 PagesTump's Argument Analysis
597 Words | 3 PagesSummary Of Why Bother By Michael Pollan
722 Words | 3 PagesBen Robert-Smith's Argument Analysis
138 Words | 1 PagesPaul Bogard's Argument Analysis
117 Words | 1 PagesAp Euro Chapter 6 Summary
876 Words | 4 PagesFrancione's Argument Analysis
1001 Words | 5 Pages