This compromise helped give each state equal say in the government. As John Samples said to the Cato Institute in In Defense of the Electoral College, “ … the Electoral College makes sure that the states count in presidential elections… an important part of our federalist system - a system worth preserving… federalism is central to our grand constitutional effort to restrain power.” (Doc C). Since this nation is founded on federalism (the sharing of power between national and state governments), it only makes sense that each individual state would want equal say in the nation’s government. Samples knew that to keep the government running smoothly, each state needed equal representation in the government, thus the Electoral College. Along with keeping balance between the states, the Electoral College also helps keep independent parties under
Many will name different and more political reasons as to what the causes of “congressional gridlocking” is. My answer isn’t as political. I believe that one of the reasons for inaction is that congress is too stubborn. I believe that the government should learn to evolve and create new rules or balances to help pass laws to fix demanding issues. A more political solution or way to put it, I guess, is to use an example I found during my research.
The relationship between Congress and the President has, since the beginning, been a difficult one to balance. The founders of The United States put into place a system of checks and balances to ensure that there would always be a struggle between both branches of government. The tension between one branch writing laws and budgets and the other branch implementing the laws and spending the money has been a basic building blocks of American government. This paper attempts to explain the relationship between the legislative and executive branches in national government. Every president seeks to influence or determine policy.
Have you ever asked yourself "how would the world be if there was no structure to allow people to vote for the person who is leading their country?". How about "Does my vote really count ?" or "does the opinion and choice of me, one person, really make a difference?". These questions aren't simply answered but should be seriously thought of by anybody who is a citizen of a country which has an established government and truly cares about the wellbeing and future of the country that they live in. I will be focused on the importance of voting for the president themselves is important.
We need a president that will the extra mile to end a war and not encourage one. We need a president that will lower the poverty rate and increase the job rate. We need a president that can and will do everything for the people that will make the correct and moral decisions to better the country. We need a Hilary Clinton. Because if Hilary Clinton than who?
JFK Rhetorical Analysis Essay Although John F. Kennedy begins his infamous inaugural speech by explaining his welcoming as president as being a celebration of freedom, he transforms it into a call for global unity, reaching not only the citizens of the United States, but of the world, which inspired American Citizens. By contemplating the problems restricting global unity, Kennedy addresses solutions to fix them, and how his proposed plan would not be completed within his term, but something to be worked for until it is achieved. During the time period in which Kennedy delivered his speech the country was in the midst of the Cold War with Russia. The American people needed a leader, and he was there to deliver. In the opening
Something is quickly approaching, the running for President of the United States. This is the most important debate. This is the time when people need to do there research on the person that they are voting for because when that person becomes your President and there is no turning back. The President of the United States has to know wand be able to work out treaties and or agreements with other nations concerning trade and aid of the United States. The President also serves as Commander and Chief of the armed forces.
Obama goes on to explain how our differences are our strengths. Obama clarifies that if we want better politics, changing a congressman, a senator, or even a president is not enough, we should change the system to reflect our better
As voters around America get ready to vote serious consideration should be given towards Hillary Clinton based on her experience and past social reforms. With the election day quickly approaching it is imperative to be able to choose a candidate that can lead this nation forward. Somebody who can solve the slowly accumulating problems of this country and bring about change for the better. There are to comparable candidates in the major running that are polar opposites, this makes the race interesting pulling apart the seams of the people. There are a number of aspects that make each unlikely as well as unpopular to some but we will take a look as to why Clinton would be considered the more favorable opponent.
Now the Supreme Court is deciding whether or not it will allow millions of undocumented immigrants to apply for programs that make them eligible for work authorization and benefits through the programs by the President. The President can make executive actions that effect the regulations of the governments issues, when he sees that congress is not taking action and that is what Obama did. The founding father made it difficult to create laws, they know if a person or group of people is given too much power then the government could be more easily manipulated so why do they want to over step an executive order, it that is why it was created