Democrat or Republican? Pro-choice or pro-life? Pro-gun or anti-gun? These polar opposite viewpoints in American politics leave little room for middle ground. A major reason for the division in America’s politics is due to the spread of misinformation through the media. With the political media, a vast amount of false information spreads in seconds, being seen by thousands because of the invention of the internet; however, many do not check the credibility of most sources they come across. This results in people believing misinformation spread online, especially if it reinforces their own political beliefs. Ultimately causing extreme separation between the two major political parties because of human’s nature to be angry, resentful, and hateful …show more content…
Political rumors usually fall into the category of being a "Wedge-driving Aggression Rumor” as explored by Robert Knapp. In Knapp's article “A Psychology of Rumor,” he states that this type of rumor's purpose is “dividing groups and destroying loyalties” and that these rumors “turn out to be directed against elements of our own population or our allies” (Knapp 497). Stemming as a type of misinformation, rumors drastically have effects in the political world. The “Wedge-driving Aggression Rumor” is a concept that can be applied heavily to false political news because its sole purpose is to support and favor one party while destroying the other out of hatred and resentment. Therefore, when someone in the political world spreads misinformation their main goal is to make more people believe and support their party ultimately trying to further divide society against one group. The "Wedge-driving Aggression Rumor” can be seen throughout our American political histories such as the rumor about Obama's place of birth or even the rumor about Churchill blackmailing Roosevelt into provoking the war with Japan. As one can see within both rumors, the purpose is drawn from human emotions of hatred and aggression with the sole purpose of getting people to believe only one side and grow hatred towards the …show more content…
The spread of "fake news” has the ability to reach thousands of people and can play an important role in elections. Media, being the mainstream way people gain insight about current events, has stimulated the spread of "fake news” as a lot of untrustworthy websites can be seen by thousands in seconds, and many will not hesitate in believing said information. In a Harvard study conducted by Andrew Guess and others, they researched the effects of consuming “fake news” and how it could influence political beliefs. To summarize their most significant findings, people who consume more trustworthy media have more polarized political opinions and greater beliefs in pro-GOP misperceptions with reduced beliefs in pro-Democratic ones (Guess et al). With these findings by researchers, one can infer that the consumption of misinformation has a galvanizing effect on people's political beliefs, meaning the information has the power to make people more entrenched in their beliefs with no room for impartiality. Guess's research proves that the belief of misinformation creates two opposed, and distinct, parties and the misinformation usually spread is pro-republican which has the ability to sway other people's opinions and even votes depending on the type of false information that is being
Information is spoon fed to individuals. An illusion of choice is present; people can always choose the news station they watch, but which station, if any, has the most accurate information? Social media and television create opinions for people so they can sit back and accept the ludicrous concepts as their own. Post are composed of current political events such as gay marriage and police brutality, but the repetition is obvious; it’s evident that the opinions are derived from others without true original thoughts or consideration on the matter. Thoughts are crammed down the throats of the people, and the people willingly accept and adopt them.
These rumors have been spread due to their ability to create a sense of anxiety among society. Studies have found that repeating rumors, “reassure people that they understand something that troubles them and perplexes them…” (Goleman 487) Next, Goleman includes a quote from Dr. Ralph Rosnow in order
Politics. What does it do to us and our views of people? In “Divided We Now Stand,” Susan Page, the current Washington Bureau Chief for USA today, explains just that. She spends the article giving readers studies and insights as to how people oppose simply because the party says to oppose, and she shows us how people feel about opposing parties and treat them as a result of partisan views. In this article, Page has many good points and strategies, but her argument could be improved.
This is evidenced by the growth of small, often internet-based, media outlets that target a niche audience with a very specific ideology. For example, the online broadcast channel The Blaze mainly targets highly conservative millennials. By having these highly specific statements of opinion, people can only choose to affirm their beliefs and make them feel stronger about them. Thus, when statements of opinion are misused, the public becomes more divided in opinion and less open to compromising with other viewpoints. This can be seen today as increasingly opinionated news reporting has been a major factor in the growing political divide in the United States.
President Trump’s continual deflections and attacks on any new agency or politician that presents him unfavorably has fueled the right’s suspicion of any entity that they deem liberal. I support the notion that people should be skeptical of the news they engage with, but in many cases this distrust is verging on fanaticism. On the other end of the political spectrum, networks that are considered liberal are practically jumping through hoops in an attempt to appear unbiased. Although political bias is often attributed to the left, It is my belief that bias may be even stronger among conservatives.
In a society where media and technology are widespread, the citizens who indulge in it are swayed to always agree and side with the
“‘The habits of social media users are a bigger driver of misinformation spread than individual attributes. We know from prior research that some people don’t process information critically, and others form opinions based on political biases, which also affects their ability to recognize false stories online,’ said Gizem Ceylan” (Madrid). Through time and as technology advances social media and news stations have spread a lot of fake news, and people believe it whether it's because they blindly believe whatever they see or if it’s biased because they like that person or
Article Media manipulation and disinformation online (2017) states that “Fake news” is a contested term, but generally refers to a wide range of disinformation and misinformation circulating online and in the media. The term itself has quickly become contentious and politically-motivated.” A lot of this division is making peoples emotions towards others change very quickly especially when they have differing ideas, which is a direct correlation to the
An example of this is the dynamic between politicians and the public, and how they use fear for personal gain. Politicians work with media outlets to spread misinformation that will motivate their voters, whether they make false rumors about competing politicians or falsehoods about conditions in society to convey their message. Besides working with politicians, media outlets will use misinformation for their own personal gain. Fake news has been a problem for generations, but with the ease of spreadability through many networks, media outlets have begun using misinformation to bait people into watching their channels. The spread of misinformation can be intentional, or unintentional, but still motivated by fear.
Lastly, I think there are many things that can be done to let people think for themselves and not be swayed by media. First off if there is something that is favored to one side there should be another segment of whatever that has the other side. Then people can watch it read and develop their own opinion on the situation and not be so swayed by media. By doing this I think more people would be stronger and have better communication skills because they would have a mind of their own instead of one that was brainwashed by the media. I also think that the news needs to report the actual truth about things and not make them sound as bad as they do so people will watch.
This is bias which comes from those within these certain groups. Demagoguery has turned into an argument of who had the better representative as a person, not as a leader. People are more willing to believe a leader who is in the in-group because they are a relatively good person. The leader could have little evidence to back up a claim and people would still defend it. Oftentimes these evidences are found because they are trying to prove a claim rather than disproving it to eliminate bias.
Occasionally we all meet someone with contradicting view than ours, for it is in human nature to be in conflict. However, there are those occasions when someone’s views, whether they agree with the view held by one’s own opinion or not, are underdeveloped. They acquire what they read or see around them and take these as the only facts of the case. The opinions held are hardly their own, just fragmented compilations of others formed by the reported news on skewed media outlets. McCombs and Reynolds once reported in 2002 within an article on the influence news that, “News media may not be successful in telling people what to think, but they are stunning successful in telling them what to think about”.
The bi-partisan government in the United States of America is further divided by the ways of the internet. The internet only makes it more readily available to find false information to prove your side of the arguement right. In the article titled “The Things People Say: Rumors in an age of unreason,” published in The New Yorker (November 2009), staff writer Elizabeth Kolbert discusses The spread of rumors across the internet and how it further divides the bipartisan government and argues that due to the filtering of ideas people are more likely to go against evidence when there are people that support their opinions. The author supports this claim by providing examples such as the study done in 1970, quoting multiple sources beyond her political
“The attack on the U.S. Capitol was based on a “Big Lie” about election fraud in 2020” (PBS). Violence is already stimulated by the lies partisan media is spreading and these attacks are only going to become increasingly maniacal. Furthermore, many believe that they are capable of avoiding the influence of partisan media because they can avoid it. “Hmielowski and Sparks examined readability, sentiment, and tone of partisan media outlets and found that non-partisan outlets are harder to read than extremely partisan outlets and that the patterns exist both on the right and left sides of the political spectrum” (ufl). Partisan media is easier to read which attracts readers and this ultimately leads them to fall victim to partisan media’s tricks.
The media has a crucial role during democratic elections when people appeal to the media to acquire information about candidates and make a decision. However, the presence of fake news threatens democracy; therefore, it is essential that people recognize the effects of fake news and combat them. Reasons behind fake news