Robert Spitzer’s case study on the New York Safe Act explicitly defines New York’s strict gun control laws. In 2013, The New York State Legislature enacted The New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act. Governor Andrew Cuomo set new regulations as a result of the Sandy Hook shootings in 2012. Since 1938, the state constitution has stipulated that legislation must be presented to the members of legislature at least “three calendar legislative days” before it can be acted upon, unless the governor certifies that, in his or her opinion, circumstances “necessitate an immediate vote,” whereupon the three-day rule is waived (Spitizer, 2015). Governor Cuomo presented the bill on January 14, 2013, and signed the bill into law on January 15, 2013. New York’s gun laws are the most stringent and strictest laws in the nation. If a New Yorker owns a legal firearm, they have to register the gun with the state as well as perform a background check. Whether a private gun sale or commercial ammunition sale, a background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is required. Gun owners cannot possess more than …show more content…
I feel that he abused his power because the law was passed in one day and avoided people who opposed the legislation an opportunity to state their case. The main issue of New York’s strict gun control laws is its effectiveness. Do these laws keep guns out of the hands of criminals? These laws do not keep guns out of criminal’s hands because of the gun trafficking problem in New York. Illegal firearms from southern states are consistently used in New York crimes. I feel that state laws associated with firearms need uniformity. The federal government has to pass a gun law for all states to follow. Gun laws issues are extremely critical because it can save thousands of people’s
This will be beneficial to mostly all parties because for any regular gun owner they should not need to purchase more than one handgun at a time. It is legislation like this that will further benefit new york state and in hopes reduce crimes and shootings among people. A final example of the effects of gun control is the restrictions on certain types of weapons in New York. While legislation to prevent firearms is in some way good new york has taken it a step further with the band on assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
Newtown, Connecticut, is a city full of parks and fields for thousands of residents. It is a tranquil place with maintained public peace and order. (children laughing sound) However, just 5 years ago, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children between six and seven years old, as well as six adult staff members. Before driving to the school, he shot his mother twice in the head when she was in her bed.
Patrick said “N.R.A.spending on lobbying outranked spending by gun control groups by a factor of ten to one” for the 2012 elections. With all that money in politics there were no new gun legislation passed. Patrick describes a cycle whenever there is a public tragedy what precedes is massive scale arms sale from a possible new regulations from arms that never comes to fruition. The writer bring up the fact that in many stores such as c.v.s you can openly buy arms with small to no regulation. Patrick proclaimed there are approximately 300 million guns in the us alone .The
April 16, 2007, started as a normal day. Virginia Tech students rushed to their classrooms to avoid being late, but little did they know the tragedy that was going to take place that dreadful day. Shortly after 10:00am 32 students lives had been taken by one of their fellow classmates. After the shooter ruthlessly shot and killed each one, he took his own life. April 16 will forever be recognized as a day of mourning and remembrance, but also as a day where we come together as a nation and overcome the defying odds we were left with.
In essence, Congress may decline to adopt an “either/or” approach and develop federal regulations but allow states to develop their own regulations. This has been the strategy adopted by Congress for the regulation of firearms. Congress has neither “occupied the field” exclusively nor completely abdicated its authority to the states. Rather, it has elected to pursue a strategy whereby states are free to regulate firearms simultaneously with the federal government. Under this approach, there are two independent regulatory schemes—one at the federal level and one at the state level.
While Gun control laws can never be to strict, Gun Control in new jersey is very regulated because gun control is also pushing back on who can purchase, New jersey gun Laws are some of the strictest in the nation, and Firearms have to be transported safely. There are permits that you have to get before you can purchase a gun. There is also a concealed carriers permit you can get if you are in a domestic violence relationship. What many people forget about and where people get in trouble is when they are not being careful with their guns when they are on there property, even though you are on your property with a gun you still have to be careful with when you take it out.
Gun control has been and is a very hot political topic. Trying to make changes in gun control goes back and changes some of the core beliefs our country was founded on. What does the Constitution say? “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. I will explain what has been changed and what people are trying to change.
Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.
‘In the late 1980s, gun control groups realized that they had failed in their original goal—getting handguns banned—and began campaigning against semi-automatic firearms they called "assault weapons," most of which are rifles’(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”). From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons (F.D.A) banned semi automatic weapons from having more than 10 rounds. The easiest way to define gun control is by saying it a government regulation sale of any type of handgun, or assault rifle. It’s just a certain style the government sales firearms, if you have a criminal background or criminal history you are not allowed to purchase a firearm due to gun control. I personally think gun control doesn’t cause any harm to today’s society, considering the fact that i’m constantly around guns and I have no violent urge to put anyone in danger.
The gun ownership in this specific state is more accessible and let qualified applicants carry any firearms that are under the limitations of the law provided. In addition, citizens, and including the majority of responsible law abiding gun owners, understand we should change the laws related to gun control in the state of Texas. Having in mind that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest guns deaths. The
One of the most controversial issues our nation faces today is gun control laws. This controversy has been created due to the different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution which states the right of citizens to bear arms; “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School). Anti-gun control laws believe that the amendment guarantees the right to bear any kind of firearms. On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands.
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.
What about the 2nd amendment and the constitutional right to bear arms? Debates on gun control are often frayed with heavy emotions and personal opinions. Not for lack of good reasoning, especially when statistics show that 40 percent of Americans know someone who was either fatally shot or committed suicide with a firearm (The Trace, 2017). However, before you form an opinion on statistics alone, try using simple logic and common sense. Imagine you’re out walking through the shopping mall or even perhaps the local neighborhood Walmart
If there are any political issue it can also be a federalism issue. One of the most major political issue in the United States are gun control laws, as there have been numerous mass shootings in the past years. As each state governments are different, there are different policies and laws based on gun control. Some states may have many more firearm restriction/ freedom than other states. However, because of its misuse of killing innocent lives, a debate sparks on whether or not gun control should be a state’s right issue or be under the power of the federal government.