Opinion Article #1 Maximilen Robespierre was one of the most practical and capable leaders I witnessed aiding to the revolution. Because he witnessed the unruly hand of King Louis XVI from my point of view as a lowly 3rd estate citizen with no power and hope, he uncovered the flaws of a monarchy system. To overcome nobility Robespierre, myself, and other members of the lower social classes joined groups and cults to end the reign against the French king. In 1792, King Louis XVI was finally executed and stripped of his title. Monarchy had come to an end in France with the death of the king, however Robespierre still noticed many rebellions despite the history of King Louis XVI’s rule. Robespierre took control of France soon after and made precautions to ensure the rights and freedom of the citizens. He knew the risks of being lenient to the people would lead to tyranny and inequality. As a supporter of the …show more content…
He made it his job to get rid of everything indicating nobility to prevent the past from resurfacing. He had people like me change our names and toss out Christian symbols, but that is a small sacrifice for the rights of people. In addition to reinforce the shift of power, he destroyed churches and restructured the Christian calendar. Anyone caught with any signs or words of disagreement could have been executed, because France can’t afford to take any more chances with the system. Due to his strict ruling, his rule was known as the “The Reign of Terror”, because of the numerous deaths of betrayers. The public did not understand the sacrifices Robespierre has to take to eliminate the reign of the king and queen. The public could only understand and concentrate on the fact that their loved ones were being condemned and the number of people executed everyday. They will soon understand to look at the big picture and realize everything done is for the better of the
Maximilien Robespierre was executed on July 28, 1794. Robespierre has appeared to be inebriated with the control over life and demise. Numerous individuals in the Revolutionary government scrutinized Robespierre 's thought processes as the nation was not under risk by any outsiders. On July 27, 1794, Robespierre and a large portion of his associates were captured and taken to jail. He found himself able to escape with the guide of a thoughtful prison guard and covered up in the City Hall in Paris.
How do you know is if someone is a hero or a tyrant? A tyrant is a single ruler who abuses his power. A hero is a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. During the French, Mexican, and Haitian revolution there were a lot of tyrannical actions, but there were also a lot of heroic actions to challenge the existing social, political and economic system.
The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).
Robespierre was influenced greatly by the teachings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, which inspired Robespierre’s belief and morals and became the main reason why he fought for equal rights for men and demand for justice and change from the French monarchy. Robespierre was not fond of the French monarchy and believed that they were abusing their power so he used his platform to advocate for change. “Robespierre and his youthful colleague, Saint-Just (1767-94)-also once an opponent of the death penalty led the way in claiming that ‘Louis must die in order for the Revolution to live,” (Robespierre and The Terror). Robespierre’s begin to call for more purges and execution, causing the people and other government officials to question Robespierre’s motives. They began to fear for their lives and in fear of another revolutionary, they decided to overthrow Robespierre and execute
He was able to arrest anyone at any time and take them to prison. The French Revolution started because they had a monarch, which abused all the power they had against the citizens. This shows how politics was the most important cause of the Democratic Revolutions because the citizens didn 't want one person to control everything with absolute power. The citizens wanted to have an opinion or a voice in the government as in voting and having the same laws for all citizens. The 3rd estate revolted against the king and formed a National Assembly to be heard and represented.
He tells us that is trying to form a “Republic of Virtue” when in reality he is just eliminating a lot of France 's significant history. Even keeping the days straight now is hard, after he changed our days and weeks up. And to think this was being done because it was a threat to the republic. Not to mention all of the unwarranted killing for his precious “Republic of Virtue”. You don 't have to do much
Robespierre believed himself to be a saviour of France and intended to provide stability. Nevertheless, his subsequent actions proved to be counterproductive to the revolution and detrimental to the French people. The French Revolution was based upon fear and uncertainty which was exploited by Robespierre illustrating his dictatorial behaviour. Robespierre actively encouraged the riots and violence that plagued France during the Terror because he believed that fear and terror was necessary for the revolution to succeed, claiming that “terror is nothing else than swift, severe, indomitable justice” (Robespierre, 1794).
Maximilien de Robespierre wrote the speech On the Revolutionary Government in order to rally the French citizens to support the revolution to save it from enemies within the government itself and because he believed that the revolutionary government has to act in a way the constitutional government can’t for multiple reasons. First, Robespierre wrote On the Revolutionary Government to call together the people of France in order to validate the need for violence in the revolution so that they could preserve their government from the enemies within, (Spielvogel, 582), “ …The National Convention, under the direction of the Committee of Public Safety, instituted the Reign of Terror to preserve the Revolution from its internal enemies.” He also believed that violence and executions were the only way to protect the their government from countries such as Austria, England, Russia, Italy, and Prussia who would question their authority and send their agents into the French government in order to undermine them and send them back into tyranny by reinstating the monarchy. Secondly, Robespierre was also one of the leading members of the Committee and they believed that any person or country not within the Republic, is an enemy and that it is up to the Committee that they kill their enemies, (Spielvogel, 581),”Louis Saint-Just, one of the younger members of the Committee of Public Safety, explained their
Arianna Paulin Mr. Bonnet World History II, French Revolution 27th of October, 2017 Through His Actions and Policies, To What Extent was King Louis the XVI Responsible for the French Revolution? Introduction Paragraph Between the years of 1785 and 1793, the French society was on the verge of collapsing. There was poverty and famine roaming the streets, making it nearly impossible to survive given the ridiculously high and unjust taxing system.
The committee of public safety had many goals but the main goal was to protect the revolution from its enemies. enemies being nobles and other nearby monarchies. robespierre was the leader of the committee of public safety and he was over achieving in preserving the revolution and doing so caused him a lot of enemies and not many friends due to executing anyone suspicious of being against the revolution. even innocent people were executed which made completely impossible to be alive and against the revolution in france. the committee of public safety were effectively protecting the revolution.
With all of this fear, how could Maximilien Robespierre possibly have a downfall? As the last two months of the terror came, the tyrant started to blame himself for the thousands of deaths. He passed the Law of the Twenty Second Prairial, which stated that all rights of the accused victim were washed away, making the executions go even faster (Linton). After the Committee of Public Safety passed this, Robespierre never attended another meeting. In his last few weeks, he rarely left his assigned room.
This enormous massacre of people went against Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, all of which the national assembly declared were every man 's right. Much of the killing can be blamed on Robespierre and King Louis XVI. Although it was mostly a failure, some achievements can be seen through the Revolution. The French Revolution helped the French people become a more equal and socialist state. This showed Europe that the French were capable of revolting and they were not afraid to stand up for what they believed.
Robespierre ended up having infinite power of the people and was overthrown and executed, resulting in a situation similar to the Old Regime (ruled by the middle class and gave power to people of property), called the
From the beginning, Robespierre followed the ideology of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Andress 105). It was not uncommon for political leaders of the Revolution to follow the philosophies of the Enlightenment thinkers; therefore, his political notions were not so far-flung and radical for the time. Robespierre worked alongside the republic’s government and used this opportunity to influence decisions made regarding the public. He would speak of his need for the extreme measures that took as well as voice the fears of his people, including starvation, death, and the degradation of the nation (Andress 103). The government was also known to be violent from time to time, which influenced the ruler to use terrorism as a means of gaining power (Andress 105).
The French Revolution was undoubtedly influenced by the political theorists of the Enlightenment. The ideas of two French political theorists in particular are easily seen throughout the French Revolution, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Baron Montesquieu. Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s thoughts and texts, such as the Social Contract, instilled the entitlement of basic human rights to all men. Rousseau’s concepts on rights combined with Baron Montesquieu’s ideas on government provided the backbone of a radical movement in the French Revolution known as the Terror. When one delves into the beginnings of the French Revolution, the motives and actions of the National Assembly, and the Terror of the French Revolution, one can obviously see the influence of two Enlightenment political theorists, Rousseau and Montesquieu.