The emerging of advanced robots has changed the way people think about their purposes in the real world. In the article “Us. And them”, Chris Carroll as an author attempted to challenge humans whether they are ready to meet and face futuristic robots or not. The main purpose of author is introducing variation of robots creation and their main roles in humans’ environment to notify humans about their future existence.
In the first few paragraphs, Carroll presents Actroid android as a new type of robots related with public, private, non-industrial service. It is clear in his example of Actroid robots that their developer focuses on physical appearance and professional character in order to work in human environment (p.1). In decade, robots
…show more content…
Refers to Peter Kahn article “What Is a Human” (2007), consideration of moral and ethical in robots is important to measure how people think about robot (p.3). Carroll provides a big question about the probability of machine creation with conscience element in its system (p.3). This is principally because of the notorious development of robots to create dangerous weapon for war and combat (pp.3-4).
Carroll uses complete and detail examples to strengthen the message of article without stating the supporting evidence. The method is used to target general and IT reader to prevent boredom. However, the author position is quite ambiguous in this article.
In the author style, Carroll combines his writing with several questions to attract reader engagement and critical thinking. However, this article is lack of introduction and conclusion. In consequence, it can confuse the reader about the purpose and main point of the article.
In conclusion, from the title, Carroll wants to give clear separation between human and robot. The positive and negative impacts of robots are covered in magnificent way. Overall, this article is good to be assignment four,
Alex Hern’s text “AI bot ChatGPT stuns academics with essay-writing skills and usability” gives us an insight into how the author feels about AI. He makes claims as well as his evidence are clear and can be read about in the following paragraphs. In one of his claims, Hern expresses his concern for people potentially losing their jobs to AI. He mentions that ChatGPT, an OpenAI foundation by Elon Musk, has “stunned onlookers with its writing ability, proficiency at complex tasks, and ease of use” (Hern).
Is Google Making Us Stupid was written by technology and culture expert Nicholas Carr, whose works have been translated into more than 25 languages. Is Google Making Us Stupid? falls under the informative and technological education categories. Carr is educating his audience on the key ideas and supporting data from research and studies. This essay examines how we use technology, with a special emphasis on how the internet has altered how we read.
Agreeing with Flores and Minor, Martinez believes Halamlainen’s advanced research allows the monograph to stand out. Two common weaknesses that the reviewers share involve the structure of the text. The reviewers agree that the contradictions Halamlainen makes towards the citations used in the text leads the reader to question the validity of the progression of the monograph’s arguments. Lastly, another flaw that Flores and Minor highlight is the writing style of the text. Minor states that the text is “dry”, which he believes may turn many readers away from the book.
The tile of the article that I have chosen is “Courageous or spineless? Our actions -- or inactions -- decide for us”. This article is written by Leonard Pitts, Jr. Leonard Garvey Pitts, Jr. (born October 11, 1957) is an American commentator, journalist and novelist. He is a nationally-syndicated columnist and winner of the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary. He was originally hired by the Miami Herald to critique music, but within a few years he received his own column in which he dealt extensively with race, politics, and culture.
Rhetorical Analysis of Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid? We are at a time where technology is widespread; it has become a part of our everyday life leading to advantages and disadvantages. Technology nowadays has become the most important topic to discuss and everyone has developed their own unique opinion. In Nicholas Carr’s article published in 2008, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he argues that as technology progresses people’s mentality changes.
Biz Carson in her article “Self-driving cars are here, but that doesn 't mean you can call them 'driverless '” discusses the status of self-driving car technology today and what drivers should expect from it in the years to come. The article uses sources that include, interviews conducted by the author, outside sources, and personal experiences in giving detailed discerptions of self-driving car technologies making it a secondary source. The article being published in the Business Insider and the article not having proper citations for the sources used categorizes it as a popular source. The writer tries to inform the audience about the growing technology of self-driving cars by creating a connection with the audience. She starts by
I will admit, this DQ question had me confused for quite some time before I started to grasp the basic concept of the three persuasive appeals of “Logos, Pathos, and Ethos”. I believe my problem was that I was over thinking it, which caused additional frustration and time to complete the assignment. In any event, here is my take of the three persuasive appeals: Ethos Ethos is one of the methods described by Aristotle to validate the author's creditability, charisma, and character. This is an important concept to use to verify that the material is written by a professional in a specifically designated field of their choice.
Aristotle identified the three critical elements in good communication. The three rhetorical strategies are ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is your credibility. The reason people should belief what you say. Pathos is making an emotional connection.
Patrick lin makes the reader think and analyze the possible outcome of the robotic industry. As stated in the essay “With the new development of robotics, it almost makes you do some soul searching on what really makes us human.” His humorous idea about robots overthrowing the world is funny, but, when you think about in a real standpoint and how technology is being made to have a mind of its own, it’s not a far-fetched
Dear, James Patterson The book House of Robots by James Patterson,taught me about acceptance and that everything is done for a reason. My favorite part of the book is when Sammy has too take E too school with him and the embareses Sammy at school when Sammy goes too the bathroom and E says don 't forget too wash your hands buddy and when Sammy comes out and gives him a hug,and says give lots of love too get it. E causes trouble at lunch when he starts a food fight at school and tries too show off in class,english class.
Brainless.com: Rhetorical Strategies in Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Do we depend on the Internet to answer all of our questions? Nicholas Carr, an American author, wrote “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in 2008 in The Atlantic, and he argues about the effects of the Internet on literacy, cognition, and culture. Carr begins his argument with the ending scene of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.
In “Better than Human”, Kelly mentions that it will be a trend for robots to replace humans on most, or even every working position in the near future as a outcome of the development of automaton-related technology. “We need to let robots take over”, Kelly assures, “they will do jobs we have been doing, and do them much better than we can (Kelly 311)”. With his observation of the invention of Baxter, he is persuaded in a great extent that humans will acquire new jobs as their old jobs get replaced by automatons. This newly invented robot surprisingly contains several epochal features, disregarding its extremely low price compared to its predecessors. With its benefits, Baxter can be promoted easily and applied to many industries, decreasing the costs of production and even re-generating the market eventually.
This statement from the author represents an informative tone in the functionality of a robot. Another example from the text would be when it states that “real world robotics spend a lot of time grappling with the hypothesis known as the “uncanny valley”, which holds that people are revolted by robots that act like, but not perfectly like humans”. So with this statement, the author is being informative in informing the audience that although robots don’t hundred percent look like humans they are still, however, able to adapt and also presentable acceptable in providing service to the
As technology and robotics progress, people continue to debate how jobs and careers could be affected. Robotic replacement might not have a negative effect , especially since it has helped our development to be able to survive. The process of the robotic development started in the industrial age. The industrial age is known for “a period in which fundamental changes
Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Literature Review The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, authored by Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky, as a draft for the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, introduces five (5) topics of discussion in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ethics, including, short term AI ethical issues, AI safety challenges, moral status of AI, how to conduct ethical assessment of AI, and super-intelligent Artificial Intelligence issues or, what happens when AI becomes much more intelligent than humans, but without ethical constraints? This topic of ethics and morality within AI is of particular interest for me as I will be working with machine learning, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations for my upcoming summer internship at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) in Norco, California. After I complete my Master Degree in 2020 at Northeastern University, I will become a full time research engineer working at this navy laboratory. At the suggestion of my NSWC mentor, I have opted to concentrate my master’s degree in Computer Vision, Machine Learning, and Algorithm Development, technologies which are all strongly associated with AI. Nick Bostrom, one of the authors on this article, is Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University and the Director at the Future of Humanity Institute within the Oxford Martin School.