Politics have been a very popular trend on social media where many ages of people can see all the political debates. Nicholas Carr provides solid evidence to convince readers that social media is ruining politics by using strong word choice, historical events, and social media itself. Strong verbiage in an argument could make all the difference to swaying one to a particular side. Carr uses exceptional word choice throughout the article to convince readers how social media is changing politics. Many of the phrases Carr uses are relatable because they encompass a variety of age groups.
In recent years, social media outlets have been responsible for the widespread mobilization of young voters everywhere in the country. It is also much easier for campaigners harness the availability of these social medias by directly contacting with voters online. The reason as to why I feel the mass media is dangerous for a democracy is because it fills the minds of voters with nonsense that only grays their judgement instead of feeding the public actual information that would go on to supplement well-thought out decisions. The lightning speed of which news is produced puts pressure on political figures to make faster decisions. With the populace becoming more accustomed to increased speed of information and action, they would be putting pressure on the government to act quickly.
Introduction Social media is the norm of the modern world. It is the tool that people has been using to keep in touch with people around them by sharing latest feeds, pictures and videos. It is also a stream that allows them to share all kind of things happening all over the world. This includes the news alerts or events such as musical concerts and award ceremonies , their favorite sport scores and results, job vacancies and even wedding.  With the rise of social media, the beginnings of the fall in popularity of traditional media like newspapers, magazines, radio and television have been more evident within the results of recent surveys and polls carried out within the industry.
Because of new media, social networking, politicians have had to use these new ways of communicating and techniques of branding, personalization, performance and public relations to be ‘known’ to the younger generation; whom get their information largely from Social media platforms and Satire TV. Politicians need to carefully construct a desirable image for them to be favored by the public. And by publicizing their activities and policy agendas politicians are in a sense making their motives for running for electoral office more transparent (John Street 2003). These new contemporary politicians have to create a personal brand, be charismatic, relatable, etc. Social media platforms have made it possible for the Politician to communicate with the public and the public to be able to have instant access to them and their activities.
Social media has created an online “culture” that has changed the way people think and behave. Throughout the articles, Carr and Thompson have differences that can be beneficial but Carr insist that human beings are sabotaging themselves with the internet in today’s generation. While Thompson believes that there are enormous benefits that come from social interactions
Studies have shown that a celebrities do in fact effect how people perceive politics. Anthony J. Nownes’s experiment on how political activity effects someone’s perception shows that “celebrities’ political activities can influence how people think about the political parties” (Nownes, 2014). Their massive followings allow stars to sway public opinion by just speaking out. This could be used to inform the public and attract attention to political or social issues. A clear example of this is found in Oprah Winfrey, actress and talk show host.
Having a wide gap between the upper and lower class doesn’t benefit the economy instead has a negative impact on it. For example, according to the Washington Post, “As income inequality grows, more and more resources are concentrated in the hands of the wealthiest. So, the idea goes, the wealthiest are better able to steer policies in directions that protect inequality at the expense of growth”. Because most of the wealth is in the hands of individuals who are at the top they have the power to do things their way. On the other hand, consumer spending plays a role in the economic growth of a country.
Propaganda can be defined as 'a form of communication that attempts to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist'. (Jowett, 2012). Propaganda has been a prominent feature of the art world since the beginning of politics, particularly within our modern-day generation. Through our prominent use of social media and the internet, propaganda is able to reach a far greater audience than ever before, graphic design leading the means by which this is achieved. This essay will discuss various notions of propaganda, comparing artwork within the topic to offer analysis of its three main forms: black, white, and grey.
Each year numerous amount of people become a social media user. The eMarketer website estimated that by 2019 “there will be around 2.77 billion social media users around the globe, up from 2.46 billion in 2017” (1). A great deal of those users utilizes social media to communicate their opinion to other users; as a matter of fact, these users might change their perspective a certain person might have on a topic. Social media is a marketing tool, therefore people utilize those social media platforms to pursue, and even manipulate the public to think in a certain way; hence, why social media can influence the public opinion. The phenomenon call “mob mentality” plays an enormous role on why social media influences the public opinion.
Social media platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, enable its users to engage in political discussions regarding current events, due to the decentralization of traditional media. The shift from traditional and unilateral media, as for instance television and broadcasting services to interactive and modern media, enables the recipients to participate in discussions. “The structural power [which was] traditionally held by the media to shape and disseminate news about the world and the limitations of the individual foreign correspondent as a conduit to global events have now met the radically disseminated world of digital media” (Owen 118). Further, „Neue Medien [wie die oben genannten] bieten attraktive und praktische Mittel,