Role Morality In Professional Ethics

1066 Words5 Pages
Professional Ethics Some professionals have the ability to be good while others do not. The capacity to follow the stipulations of their professions is what determines the ratings for whether professional is right or wrong. Various forms of ethics govern how professionals carry out their day-to-day activities. There are role moralities and common moralities whose applications clash with one another. The paper focuses on Luban’s work and talks about role morality and the rule of utilitarianism in justifying the ethical roles among the professionals. Explanation of “Role Morality" According to Luban, role morality is described as the unique moral obligations that are created by the day-to-day social roles. These moral obligations are inconsistent with the everyday moral requirements. Occupations generate specific duties of their own. The functions differ from occupation to occupation. Notably, occupation-specific functions have no problem of role morality. They are not in tension with the common morality counterparts. It will be of no harm to ordinary term morality as a general respect towards fellow man. Additionally, the judgment of the general rules with regards to common morality is known by people from all walks of life. The universality and ordinary occurrence of the common morality make the morality that much common. Moreover, the problem of role morality may occur from time to time. The problems of role morality arise when the role-related duties have counterparts

More about Role Morality In Professional Ethics

Open Document