Recently, Boko Haram in Northern
Nigeria has become the major source of crisis and fear in the country.
The violent activities of this group include attacks on churches and the death of a number of Christians.
Since Boko Haram is considered an Islamic fundamentalist group, its activities against Christians can ignite violent conflicts between
Christians and Muslims. This article explains the role of civil society in preventing the escalation of the crisis into a religious conflict between Christians and Muslims. It examines the role of the Christian
Association of Nigeria (CAN) and other religious institutions in the prevention of the escalation of the crisis. The major source of primary data is key informant interviews.
Secondary data were
…show more content…
XXXII NO. 3 SEPTEMBER 2015
CIVIL SOCIETY AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA
28
Boko Haram
Boko Haram officially calls itself Jama’atul Alhul Sunnah Lidda’wati wal
Jihad, which means people committed to the propagation of the Prophet’s teachings and Jihad.15 The expression “Boko Haram” is derived from one
Hausa word Boko which means book and an Arabic word Haram which means sin or forbidden. Generally, the expression portrays western education or anything associated with western civilization as sinful and forbidden.16 It is important to note that one could argue that this is an extreme interpretation and that the real grievance of members of the Boko Haram group is the corruption associated with people who benefit the most from “Western” education. In the same vein, Abdulkarim Mohammed, a researcher on Boko
Haram, added that violent uprisings in Nigeria are ultimately due to “the fallout of frustration with corruption and the attendant social malaise of poverty and unemployment.’’17 Some other scholars are of the view that the intent of Boko Haram adherents is to replace modern state formation with the traditional
Islamic state, because Western values run contrary to Islamic values.18
They believe that evil in the society is
…show more content…
XXXII NO. 3 SEPTEMBER 2015
CIVIL SOCIETY AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA
34
retaliate, but a call to the government to prevent the reoccurrence of such attacks. This kind of response can to some extent prevent Christians from reacting violently, and turning the situation into a conflict between Muslims and Christians. If CAN has persistently engaged in provocative statements that could incite Christians to fight against Muslims the situation could have been very different. Sometimes when notable leaders of CAN make aggressive statements, some other members attempt to reduce tension by opposing such confrontational statements and encouraging Christians to pray for peace.
The youth section of CAN also played useful roles in reducing the escalation of the crisis. For example, the Kaduna chapter of the youth section of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), offered a part of their premises to their Muslim counterpart for prayers. They also provided water to their Muslim brothers to conduct their
Magrib (night) prayers inside the premises of CAN. Such inter-religious activities have helped to foster peace between
Muslims and Christians despite the activities of the Boko Haram group.38
The second reason why the
Safi also made it known that terrorism is happening everywhere. However, the world only seems to care when it takes place in a major city, or cities in the West. In order to beat this problem, the world must open their hearts and “let the light permeate us,” (Safi, par. 36). Sadly, in today`s world, any religious violence that occurs is immediately associated with Islam. Many people in the world isolate Muslims because of the fear that all Muslims are bad.
In this article the author studies the beginnings, believes and principal arguments of Religious terrorism and questions them based on analytical assessment traditions. It evaluates the legitimacy of the concept and its effects for research and policy practices. It argues that the distinctions typically drawn between nonspiritual and religious terrorism are problematic, both theoretically and empirically, and that in its usual assumptions, the term is misleading about the intentions, foundations and behavior of groups classified as ‘religious terrorist’. In particular, it shows that the diversity of those labelled “religious terrorists” is so mixed, and often so indistinguishable from their ‘nonspiritual’ equals, that the term has little meaning without further limitation, while simultaneously darkening key characteristics of both ‘religious’ and ‘nonspiritual’ violence. It then goes on to illustrate how the term, rooted in a particular historically situated understanding of religion and a particular set of power structures, serves as a disciplinary device to domesticate ‘political religion’, delegitimizing certain actors while legitimizing a number of highly contentious counterterrorist practices designed to deal with those described as ‘religious terrorists’.
Expanding numbers of terrorism in our world are happening so frequently these days, in the face of attempts to contest these indifferences amidst people. “Most people are not aware of the influence of
Secondly, the actions of ISIS and Al-Qaeda, and the laws and regulations placed after the ISIS and Al-Qaeda attacks, severely affects innocent Muslims in America due to ISIS’ and Al-Qaeda’s Islamic illegitimacy. In an article written by Igor Volsky and Jack Jenkins, titled “Why ISIS is not, In Fact, Islamic”, ISIS’ behavior is examined and proven to anti Islam. In Volsky’ and Jenkins’ article, they write that even Muslim extremist have strict rules they abide by to sustain their Muslim status, however ISIS commit heinous acts, that even break Islamic extremism rules, that are considered anti Islam, such as: slaughtering children, raping woman, and using sex slavery as a weapon (Volsky). This article explains how ISIS somehow tends to break
This course of action similarly enhances tension between idealistic Muslims who continue to stay devoted to their religion, and hence find a means to project that through radicalized courses of actions. The product of conflict is danger to entirety of the group involved, and hence it is best to find sympathy and solidarity between the oppressed and
Imperialism in Nigeria Today, Nigeria is one of the many developing third-world countries in Africa, with a high prevalence of poverty, disease, violence, poor human rights record, and stagnant ideals relative to modern ways of thinking. All of these current issues are a result of one underlying cause: imperialism. From 1901 to 1960, Nigeria was under British colonial rule. As a result of the Industrial Revolution, economic interest proliferated.
Vision The U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) commander’s vision is to foster a more stable region in West Africa where the sovereignty and security of all states are protected. In order to achieve this vision, USARFRICOM must help create conditions in which Nigeria no longer poses a threat to its neighbors and has been prevented from obtaining weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), while also denying violent extremist organizations (VEOs) the ability to conduct operations in the region. By removing these primary drivers of instability USAFRICOM will create the conditions for a more stable environment that supports greater economic development and prosperity. Introduction The environment in West Africa is increasingly fragile with states facing challenges that threaten stability across the region. The most significant regional challenge is Nigeria’s increasing aggressiveness toward its neighbors.
Gabriel Aborisade GEOG130-0108 Legacies of Colonization in Nigeria 03/02/2018 Introduction The name Nigeria was coined from the river Niger. Miss Flora Shaw who later became Lady Lugard named it Niger-Area on January 8th, 1897. Nigeria became a British protectorate as a Northern and Southern protectorate. Those two protectorates were amalgamated by 1914 by Lord Lugard.
The sovereign movement largely remains using nonviolent methods to attack their enemies, the increase in violence attacks and the nonviolent attacks does show the current strategy of the sovereign movement as described by Andrew Kydd & Barbara Walter in their article “The Strategies of Terrorism”. In their article, Kydd & Walters outline five distinctive strategies that can be used to further understand terrorist goals. The five strategies discussed are: attrition, intimidation, outbidding, provocation, and spoiling (Kydd & Walter, 2006). Using the strategies defined by Kydd & Walter, the type of attacks encouraged by the sovereign movement suggest a strategy of attrition with some lone wolf attacks along the lines of provocation. As discussed
Domestic violence is one of the biggest problems in this day and age. Most families stay together despite the fact that they are getting hurt. Some parents don’t believe that their spouse is abusing them. Some kids can't view their parents as bad or abusive. Catholicism was brought upon nigeria from the british.
Classical sociological factors like socioeconomic, lack of education, peer pressure, environment solidarity, may explain why individuals from Europe’s lower social status, however it does not explain why radicalization appeals to will-integrated middle-class Muslims in Europe, because they are individuals with no lack of education, job opportunities or resources to engage in politics. The key contention of this group is that violent radicalization rises from challenges Muslims are faced, when they attempt to create an identity for themselves, but are influenced by the West. These young Muslims no longer feel a part of the community because they do not identify with their community. The militant Islamism allows the individual to see their own situation of not identifying with their community, as a result of their own failing, but as a result of the Western culture dominance over Muslims (Nielsen 2010). It is this search for identity, dignity, meaning, and community, combined with the perceived discrimination that prompt a radical view of the West.