Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech. Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
“over 1500 books are challenged becuase of “explisit” sexcual content..” (“Banned and challenged books by the numbers”). (12 infographics about banned and challenged books). Books are one of the best sources for information Kids are missing out on the great quality of books that have/will be banned. “Parents who don 't like specific books can have their kids "opt out" of an assignment without infringing on the rights of others. The National Coalition against Censorship explained that "Even books or materials that many find 'objectionable ' may have educational value, and the decision about what to use in the classroom should be based on professional judgments and standards, not individual preferences."
There are countless reasons that everybody should know why books are being banned all over the world! One of the reasons is that parents do not want their children to be exposed to inappropriate topics. Moreover, some books discusses topics that people object to like dark arts and homosexuality. However, there are also reasons why books should not be banned. When children enjoy books, it improves their vocabulary, and it teaches them life lessons.
To Kill a Mockingbird should still be taught in school systems, and should not be a banned book because the novel focuses on a part of history that should not be ignored. Just because history is harsh and not always the most pleasant thing to learn about, does not mean that we can ignore it. Kenya Down with PBS said, “Being uncomfortable with history is not means to change it; people need to figure out how to confront issues.” Down also mentioned how Lee’s book is one of the most banned books
The first amendment gives American citizens the right of freedom of speech, this allows us to express ourselves with the protection of our government, despite this fundamental freedom given to us is restricted as soon as we step onto school grounds that enforce a dress code. Clothes as a reflection of self and culture which is protected under the First Amendment. Uniformness is not what we as people strive for, we strive for unique people and with dress code regulations that is harder to accomplish, But do school dress codes help enforce discipline? Not all schools enforce a dress code and they function just fine with the benefited happiness of its school body, so why do some schools still enforce a dress code? Schools use dress codes to help
“Theodor Geisel, a.k.a. Dr. Seuss, influenced nearly every living American who ever learned to read(Porter William. ).” Theodor’s books have introduced millions of children into the joy of reading. The books teach morals and responsibility. When children read books they learn and take in what the books are trying to tell them.
United States of America, a country that is known for its striving democracy and its amendment towards “freedom of speech”, made an unlawful decision by allowing many public places like libraries and schools to apply censorship and ban books. Literature and any other type of writing are all types of freedom of speech because it allows each author to express themselves and their message through their work. With the authority of censorship and banning of books in a democracy like the United States causes a danger to us because we would not have the ability to obtain certain knowledge that might help us in a significant way. Additionally, I think we would be affected if we did not read any of the short stories we read in class, for example, “Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison. If we had not read “Battle Royal, we would never have the chance to unscramble and understand his symbolism in his
Just because some people disagree with some books, does not mean others should not be allowed to enjoy them. Books should not be banned because it closes doors for information that mature people should be able to read. Another reason books should not be banned is that it deprives people of learning experiences that they may encounter soon. Books should not be banned also because some of the books are excellent for history, or learning experiences. Books should not be able to be banned because it closes the door for great lessons and deprives people of learning about the world around them.
Ever heard of books being banned? If so, did the news affect you, probably not at first but eventually the change will be remarkably noticeable. Say goodbye to straightforward information, rights, and useful instruction. All people have rights in the world and one of those rights is to read. Banning books should be prohibited because each person should be able to read whatever they need to, or desire to.
Knowing how to fluently using English, especially at an early age, brings about plenty of advantages that can diversify Vietnamese culture. The Internet plays a crucial role in our daily life. By using it properly children can learn more about all the cultures around the world and selectively adapt them into their life. Many efforts have been made in order to eternally abolish some outdated traditions that are said to keep Vietnam from becoming globalized. Male chauvinism used to be a big issue in Vietnam.
Some people are not as extreme with their ideas about the novel but some do believe it has no right to be taught it in classroom. For example, “University of Pittsburgh English Professor Jonathan Arac, author of “Huckleberry Finn as Idol and Target: The Function of Criticism in out Time,” agrees that the book should be removed from required reading lists. Unlike the NAACP, Arac doesn’t think it should be removed from the curriculum entirely.” Now in this case, it isn’t as bad as wanting the book to be out of the school, out of the town, out of the state, or wanting the book to be banned overall. It shows that he sees something wrong with the novel and doesn’t want students being required to read it. However the issue that people are finding with the novel is exclusively from not understanding the fantastic novel.