In the city of Rome, the Common Good was met by providing the five purposes of government in an advanced procedure. Public services, protected rights, rule of law, common defense, and supporting the economic system was performed in a well civilized manner.
Public services played a big role in the Roman city which is why I have decided to give it an A. First, 200 million gallons of water were contributed to run through the city daily. The citizens used the water to form a public bath that became an important gathering place for the rich and poor. They also created surplus water fountains and road aqueducts, which would support the common good. The tripartite (Roman government in a trio) did a successful job by providing water supply to the
…show more content…
I would give this role of government an A for various reasons. First and foremost, the laws written and declared by the Republic were applied to everyone. Even elected officials could be tried for violating the law after their term of office was over. With everyone following the same laws, everyone should have the same right to or not to do something. Throughout the government there was also a system called Checks and Balances. The three branches of government, the Senate, Magistrates, and Assemblies, formed a tripartite. Checks and Balances were made so that one part of the government can’t overpower another. For instance, at assemblies Roman citizens can elect officials and pass laws, but it has to go through the Senate first before becoming official. The Senate can “veto” (veto means to decline, or say no) if they think that the law should not be made. By having Checks and Balances, each part of the government was equal and fair. In addition, Rome had an established religion that was supported by the government. This means that citizens were protected by the government for their religion. With reasoning, I would give an A to the Roman Republic for their Rule of …show more content…
I would give it a B for a particular reason. Gaius Marius was a powerful consul who changed and improved the Roman army. At around 100 BC only citizens who could afford their own armor, could serve in the military. This had restricted many people to join. The new soldiers who had entered the army, stayed there for many years. When the soldiers then retired, the government gave them land as a reward and to support themselves. Marius sometimes even allowed the poorest citizens to join the army. This made the military larger and more professional. With this colossal protection, it secured the Roman citizens from other civilizations and other people (enemies). A downfall of this is that those who haven’t served in the military for 25 years, were not considered a citizen. With being a woman, I believe that it is unfair for us to not be able to participate in the military and be reasoned as a citizen as well. We were just supposed to stay home and take care of the children and household. The men didn’t think we were capable of doing such. As the Roman army was a powerful and strong one, it included many challenges that citizens had to overcome, which limited the amount of people that would protect their
The Roman Republic, over time, evolved into a government that would help create the U.S. Constitution, which is essential since it gives rights to the people. Although the Roman and the United States governments existed during different times, they are similar since both governments had a massive increase in expenditures after winning their second major war, yet both governments are also different since the Roman Republic and the United States government have different methods of checks and balances like making someone have the majority of votes so they can be elected. The United States and the Roman Republic governments are similar since both governments increased their expenditures after their second major war, this included more military
Citizenship in Athens and Rome: Which was the Better System? 1. The idea of citizenship, or a status given by a government to its people, emerged in approximately 500 BCE. Citizens were responsible for playing significant roles in the life of the state or nation, but in turn were able to possess and benefit from certain rights. Compared to Athens, the Roman Republic's system of citizenship was better in the fact that it was more generous, although careful, in granting citizenship in which rights made the government much more organized.
Agustus created the census which was used for fairer taxation. Because of fairness, there was stability for the people, and peace in the empire. Another piece of Roman government that led to peace and stability were the Twelve Tables of Rome: a codified law system. These laws were set up in the Forum, Rome’s marketplace, so that they were easily accessible to everyone. Knowing what the laws are, and the punishments for breaking laws, lead to peace in the Roman Empire.
HIST 1421 The Life and Governmental Structures of the People of Athens and Sparta UoP Word Count: 1447 Abstract In this paper I will discuss how the people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community. I will also talk about who was able to hold public office and what kinds of rules governed the selection of public office holders.
The United States follow the path of the Roman Republic. Although there are many similarities and differences,
Romans were also not beasts for not participating in government unlike the Athenians who punished them. In document D it also states that they were “ ranked into distinct classes” which shows that they were put together and had their priorities straight. In document F it states “ senate had full governing power in Rome” which is better than in Athens where everyone kinda ruled, Rome was more of a democracy. This evidence all helps to show that Rome was better when it came to citizenship because they were more thought out and not all
Rome’s constitution had three different elements which held independent powers and shared their ideas to prove the constitution was democratic. The consuls and magistrates were the supreme masters of government and called together the People’s Assemblies to carry out whatever the majority of what the Assemblies decided (Doc A). Polybius also greatly admired how the Romans structured their
The Roman government system was organized into three branches, just like the United States. As seen in Document 1, the three branches were the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. These branches
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion
The reasons are, citizenships in Rome were varied, everyone was treated equally, and those who gain too much power weren’t exiled out of their country. Varied Citizenship: Document A/E • Freed slaves could be citizens • Female and male children were citizens • Both male and female were citizens Document A tells you the gender and social classes that can be a citizen in Rome or Athens. Rome allowed almost everyone to be a citizen while Athens only allowed men. In Document E it shows that only males are going to vote and explains the process of how it works. Equality: Document D • Empires that were captured by Rome were allowed
The Romans needed a large army to protect their empire. That is why, all men who were Roman citizens aged between 17 and 46 could be called on to join the army. They joined large army units called "legions", smaller units were "centuries". Army was greatly equipped with heavy weapons, shields, steel helmets, leather kilts. Soldiers joined the army for 25 years and in all that time they could not marry.
In Ancient Rome, the Romans had their own Roman Republic. The Roman republic reasonably met the common good. The way they did this was that they didn’t fully meet the common good in all areas, but in other areas they did. In public service I would give the Ancient Romans an A. One of the greatest achievements in ancient time was the waterway.
3. Compare and contrast the idea of democracy in Ancient Greece and Rome. Which system was more democratic and why? Democracy is the modern day standard for governmental systems. However up until 500 BCE, the concept of Democracy was a foreign concept, and the great civilizations of that era were run by monarchs, aristocrats, and religious leaders of sorts.
The Roman armies used to be comprised of volunteers but after being defeated, they were determined to make their army better. They did this through vigorous trainings. Roman soldiers called legionaries, were forced to march for long distances carrying heavy loads. Every year, senior military officers, called Tribunes, would select the strongest men to be part of the army. In the end, the Romans became professional in fighting and had one of the most disciplined armies.
The magistrates and tribunes… were the only ones who could place legislation before the voters.” The small percent of citizens that actually did vote in Ancient Rome were spoon-fed their candidates by higher ups like the magistrates in