ipl-logo

Role Of Judiciary In The Judicial System

1019 Words5 Pages

“The judicial system is the most expensive machine ever invented for finding out what happened and what to do about it.” Irving Robert Kaufman, federal judge.
Judiciary also known as judicial system or court system that interprets and applies the law in the name of state is the third limb of criminal justice system after police and prosecution. In India judiciary is said to have played or have been playing a major role in imparting justice to the people and safeguarding their rights and liberties. Judicial system is the pillar of Indian democracy, which is under undesirable situation facing variety of internal and external problems which puts a question mark on the credibility and accountability of judiciary.
The major issue of concern for …show more content…

So I think judicial credibility can be enhanced when it is accountable and transparent. The Judiciary is independent in a sense that it is answerable to any one and not act arbitrarily and the chief justice of high court and supreme court should have the power to enforce discipline and to take some corrective or advisory measures against his colleagues whenever aberrations in their conduct came into notice as the provision of impeachment is also very difficult to implement. Further judicial standard and accountability bill which is pending need to be passed in order to became judiciary more …show more content…

and they deal those matters by rotation without having specialized knowledge in the field like they deal criminal first they tax law which affect the quality of justice and also need to be specialized and also better training should be given to the judges during appointment will work. Another issue of witness protection and offence of perjury has been a highlight of malimath committee report where they emphasized on rights of witness as it was guaranteed in USA and other countries for their protection from different threats and other process of turning hostile and also convenient for them to be a part of justice system, further process of taking action against perjury is also cumbersome and unsatisfactory and it need to be changed where judges can punish for the offence of perjury strictly according to section 8 of the act and also change in section 344 of CRPC should be made to punish perjury. Short term tenure of judges in apex court is an issue need to be considered where in short span of time they do not master the law and acquire maturity at the Supreme Court level because of retirement at the age of 65. Comparing to USA there is no retirement age

Show More
Related

  • Federalist Number 51 Summary

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    People suffer in the judicial branch due to a lack of knowledge and power that is being withheld. Many people are not aware of the issues that is happening within the branch which typically causes chaos and destruction. Each judge should possess exceptional qualifications of a judge and be free of political

    Read More

  • Explain The Strengths Of The Judicial Branch

    1067 Words  | 5 Pages

    The three branches were established by the Constitution and divided into executive, legislative, and judicial. The executive branch consists of the president and his cabinet, the legislative branch consists of Congress, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, and the judicial branch consists of the Supreme court and other federal courts. Focusing on the judicial branch, the Constitution has established the Supreme Court as the only court to make decisions of national importance. One strength of this branch is that it holds the power to provide equal justice and determine if the laws passed by Congress are constitutional through appeals, trials, and review. “Put simply, for federal theorists judicial supremacy exists because it must:

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Judicial Branch

    813 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to a poll conducted by Gallup, in just the past two decades, the percentage of people who approve of the way the Supreme Court conducts its job has declined from 62% to 40% (Supreme Court). The percentage of people who disapprove has increased from 29% to 58%. It is clear that many Americans today do not approve of the Supreme Court and its Justices. The changes in these percentages can be attributed to the widespread concern that Justices are not impartial. However, it is a fact that bias is within all of us, and we can not only blame the Justices.

    Read More

  • What Is The Role Of Sentence Disparity In Criminal Justice

    1014 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States justice system is a complicated system. The justice system is the third branch of the government. This branch holds the responsibility to create and up hold laws. The justice system has a precise order of how things fall into place when a crime has been committed. The process to arrest an individual to the sentencing of that individual takes a bountiful amount of steps and procedures.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Judges Being Appointed

    167 Words  | 1 Pages

    The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.

    Read More

  • Rena Mae Carter Case

    771 Words  | 4 Pages

    The judicial system is very important in the administration of justice for any society. Functions of the system are clearly stipulated and defended by the constitution of any nation. For a judge to pass a ruling on a suspect, the trial has to go through several stages before a final ruling is arrived at. Thus, one would believe the judgments made are considered fair making the judicial system a defender of justice and fairness.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Texas Judicial System

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    To begin with, the problem with having the people elect their judges is that the citizens know next to nothing about who they are voting for. Of course, it is important the people have a say in the decision-making, but the fact of the matter is that not everyone is an expert in government. Candidates have no problem in persuading the people that the other candidate is evil and corrupted and not suitable to serve. Furthermore, it is difficult to learn how well a judge preforms his or her job once they are put into office. Why?

    Read More

  • Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.

    Read More

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Specialized Courts

    420 Words  | 2 Pages

    Specialized Courts Specialized courts are commonly known as the problem-solving courts that promote positive reinforcement, support behavior modification, decrease victimization, and reduce recidivism. Examples of specialized courts include drug court and mental health courts. A community might benefit from establishing a specialized court such as a drug court because it follows a comprehensive model that concentrates on reducing criminal actions through treatment and rehabilitation services with the focus being on substance abuse addiction and identifying the cause without jeopardizing public safety and due process (Specialized Courts, 2013).

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    This may cause a judge to render a decision based on obligation instead of holding true to their beliefs. This pressure is not easily felt as intensely by appointed judges, especially those with lengthy terms. In considering the equity of the pros and cons it is my opinion that the existing system in place works best. Every system is flawed.

    Read More

  • Three Major Components Of The Criminal Justice System

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the criminal justice system, there are three major components. They are the police, the courts, and the corrections. Each one of the components has a role to play in the system. The police are in charge of arresting and investigating crimes. The courts are charged with the responsibility of punishing offenders while the corrections implement the court rulings.

    Read More

  • The Canadian Judicial System

    1155 Words  | 5 Pages

    Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice System Essay

    721 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are three components that make up the criminal justice system – the police, courts, and correctional facilities – they all work together in order to protect individuals and their rights as a citizen of society to live without the fear of becoming the victim of a crime. Crime, simply put is when a person violates criminal law; the criminal justice system is society’s way of implementing social control. When all three components of the criminal justice work together, it functions almost perfectly. For a person to enter the criminal justice system, the process must begin with the law enforcement.

    Read More

  • Assess The Importance Of Diversity In The Judiciary

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    Diversity has been recognised as a valuable initiative in the advancement of a workplace, however recent studies in England and Wales show that the judiciary remains largely imbalanced . For decades diversity has been a central matter within the legal sphere but according to a recent report by the Council of Europe published at the end of 2014, women only make up 25% of judges in England and Wales and to this day, Lady Hale remains the only representative for women in the Supreme Court . Furthermore, diversity statistics in 2015 concluded that the percentage of BME judges remains unchanged at 7%. Damning statistics such as these prove that the judiciary is currently in a detrimental situation, particularly because diversifying the workplace encourages innovation: ‘There is a large body of evidence going back many decades which shows that more culturally diverse businesses are more innovative. Recent research also shows that workforce diversity is also

    Read More

  • Role Of Judiciary In Malaysia

    1103 Words  | 5 Pages

    Malaysian judiciary refers to the Malaysian court system. It is an independent body separate from the legislative and executive arms of government. The role of courts is to ensure the law and order are followed, that justice is done, and criminals are punished. The head of the judiciary is the Chief Justice.

    Read More

More about Role Of Judiciary In The Judicial System

Open Document