Role Of Shaming In The Code Of Hammurabi Essay

Everybody makes mistakes! People break the rules, children argue with their parents, and people make bad discussions. It is human nature. Should a person have to be publicly humiliated because of a mistake? Even though it is better than physical abuse, shaming is still abuse because it can cause self harm and it can ruin people’s lives. Some say that public shaming is better because it is not actual physical abuse. This has been debated for thousands of years. King Hammurabi (1795-1750 BC) of Babylon came up with the first code or laws to be followed. It was the first known society to live by a written set of laws. In fact, some of our laws are based off the Code of Hammurabi. There were clear rules and punishments and every one knew what to expect if they broke the law. So would say, even this code had some public shaming. The term “an hand for a hand” came from the Code of Hammurabi. Yes,

Shaming isolates, degrades, and causes rejection. By publicly shaming a person, they are being exposed to attention they did not want, and are encouraging others to exclude and reject the person being shamed. Not only did Isabel Laxamana lose her life, the lives of her friends and family also changed. It is easy to shame a person in a large crowd where the abuser can slip away into the group unnoticed. They can also draw support to shame and abuse from a larger audience.

So, it is clear that although that its better than physical abuse, shaming is still abuse for two main reasons. First, it can cause self harm. But most importantly, it can ruin people's lives. Should a person have to die or be emotionally scarred for mistakes they have made or because they look a little different, just because someone decides to make fun of them? Should another child have to end their life because of a humiliating video? It is clear that public shaming is abuse and should be