Even from its earliest days, Rome’s citizen cavalry commanded prestige and respect in the military and political structure of Rome. From the violent days of Romulus, through the time of kings, and through the Republic, the citizen cavalry’s elite role in the Roman army provided a path for wealthy young men seeking to distinguish themselves for future political service. This citizen cavalry served Rome well for centuries before being mostly replaced by allied auxiliaries in the first century B.C. Although it is widely believed that the citizen cavalry declined due to military ineffectiveness, the citizen cavalry actually faded away due to social and cultural changes that affected the organization of the military. Rome’s storied …show more content…
This new class of citizens did not come from the hereditary founding nobility called the patricians, but from a group distinguished primarily by wealth: “The primary criterion for service in the cavalry was wealth” (McCall, 146). Possessing wealth and military merit, the equestrian class earned social standing at the founding of the Republic. To replenish the ranks of the senate that had been “thinned by the murderous cruelty of Tarquin”, Lucius Junius Brutus “brought into it leading men of equestrian rank ...lessening the friction between patricians and populace" (Livy, 2.1). The strata of Roman society were distinct, but malleable, and allowed for the introduction of the equestrian class, which contained strata of its own. First in the cavalry were the "equites equo publico, elite Romans who rode horses subsidized by the state and voted in the prestigious eighteen equestrian centuries of the centuriate assembly" (McCall, 134). The military function and sociopolitical value went together. "Later, wealthy Romans who served on their own mounts -equites equis suis - began to supplement the force of the equites equo publico" (McCall, 134). These cavalrymen who provided their own horses were in the equestrian census, but did not possess voting rights in the centuriate assembly. Although with minor disparity in political rights, the citizen cavalrymen "formed one undifferentiated pool of cavalry recruits" (McCall, 149). Likewise, the equestrian class became one undifferentiated pool of citizens: “Apparently, the term equites had become a technical term…referring to a distinct class that was superior, in economic terms, to the infantry” (McCall, 175). First, the cavalry comprised only nobility, then was expanded to the equestrian class, and then this class itself was expanded to supplement those needed for cavalry service in the ever-expanding Roman
Severus invited the Praetorian Guard to join him at a celebration unarmed; however, once they arrived, he gave a speech condemning the soldiers for their treachery and had them surrounded and killed. Now, Septimius Severus was able to replace these unfaithful soldiers with his own, devoted Praetorian
The citizens would elect Praetors, these were judges that ruled in the judicial branch and would be voted for each year(AR). Usually only the wealthy Praetors would be elected leaving out the middle and lower class citizens of Rome(AR).Today in The U.S., people can vote on issues that are addressed within America and are also able to vote on who is elected as the president no matter what financial state they are in. In Rome, the lower class citizens also known as the plebeians, were forced into the army and were furious at the fact that
From the rise to the fall of Rome, Scholars have been interpreting the historical documents of Rome for centuries. “753 the first Roman king, Romulus, founded an advisory council of 100 men. This body would become the Senate” (Muscato , 2016). The establishment
After Carthage Rome’s hunger for new lands was nearly insatiable, this perhaps was brought about by the very act of the long war with the Carthaginians. Changes were in store for Rome due to their now very war-like attitude. Changes in senate policy along with social order would reorganize Rome for the foreseeable future. Consuls and tribunes held positions in the senate, both of whom were strongly linked to the army therefore the senate would ultimately control the Roman army. “[…] the tribunes alone […] are subject to them, and bound to obey their commands.”
Men farmed their own or nobles land. There were three classes. On the top was the emperor who was supported by the military. 1st was the nobles who were military and government authority. Next were artisans then commoners.
This corresponding perception can be acknowledged as according to Suetonius, Augustus “…could neither satisfy the veterans nor the landowners, since… they were not being treated as their services had led them to hope.” This same issue was also further addressed and revealed throughout Tacitus’s works as he exclaimed that in order to keep the veterans and landowners quiet, to consequently maintain his impeccable appearance, “Augustus won over the soldiers with gifts, the populace with cheap corn.” On the other hand, although Tacitus and Suetonius’s viewpoint could be perceived as bribery or enticement another individual, such as that in favour of Augustus, could of seen it as generous and substantial, in hand showing a pure demonstration of how alternate perspectives may be predisposed by the early judgment of an individual such as
This paper will explain what the Stoics view as eudaimonia and will apply this definition to the military life. I will apply Stoic view, specifically to the lives of soldiers and how they are supposed to conduct themselves. Through this, I will show the practicability and impracticality that of Stoicism in the lives of combatants. I will make an argument that Stoicism in military life can have damaging effects on combatants and a more moderate approach needs to be taken to ensure the health of combatants. The first page of Epictetus’s handbook says, “Some things are up to us and some are not up to us.
There was a time, many years ago, when I was a budding young entrepreneur fighting the good fight. My father, Nerva, was a relatively young senator who adopted me out of the Roman Army when I was but a child. Grateful as I was, I worried for the health of my new father whose gray hair and tired face showed years of stress and many a sleepless night. The Montresor family was vast and powerful, and the name carried influence throughout the Empire was recognizable by friend and enemy alike across the globe. For the next year, I trained with generals and scholars alike – just about anyone my father could convince to prepare me for the Senate.
A citizen had to make a choice between his loyalty and social conscience. However, Roman women had a limited form of citizenship. They were not allowed to vote or stand for civil or public office. Women had the right to own property, to engage in business, and to obtain a divorce, but their legal rights varied over time. People probably wonder who the patricians really are, well they are rich and powerful and govern the city from the Senate.
This shows Julius Caesar was a hero because he was so great that so many people trusted him with their life. The soldiers would probably die for Caesar and they would help them as much as
It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.
The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.
Among the concessions which plebeians received from patricians was regarding the law of twelve tables. These laws were publicly displayed for all to see and they protected the Roman citizen’s basic rights despite the social class that they belonged to. This was after they had played a very significant role in acquiring these rights during the transition period. In conclusion, this essay clearly depicts that the common people had a large role to play in the movie "Julius Caesar."
Yeomanry were more commonly known as middle-classed people, considering they obtained an adequate amount of wealth.
People would be separated into two categories: Patricians and Plebeians. Patricians were the upper class, this included members of the senate and their family. People were often born into upper class by blood. Plebeians were the lower class, this included the commoners, Latins, foreigners, freed people, and slaves. Women per se were included into social classes but was considered the husband’s social role.1 Women married young in the Roman Republic, leaving their home and authority of her father into her husband’s.