Roman Republic Checks And Balances

815 Words4 Pages

INTRODUCTION:

According to (National Geographic Society, 2022). As the final Etruscan king of Rome was deposed, the Roman Republic was established in 509 BCE. With two representatives chosen by legislative assemblies to preside over the Roman Senate and lead the Roman military, the Roman government functioned as a representative democracy in the form of a republic. Nevertheless, the Roman Republic never aspired to be a direct democracy; instead, it had a fused government that combined elements of "kingship," "aristocracy," and democracy.
Throughout its existence, the Roman Republic maintained its undemocratic nature, with many of its institutions growing less democratic as time went on. Due to social and economic upheavals in 130 B.C., politics became violent, which led to the adoption of a secret ballot that made it impossible for Roman officials to be …show more content…

These features are still present in the American government today. The comitia centuriata (Centuriate Assembly) and the comitia tributa were among the most significant democratic institutions in Republican Rome (Tribal Assembly). Citizens may vote on laws in these assemblies and choose representatives to rule on their behalf. In addition, the Roman Republic maintained a system of checks and balances that aimed to strike a balance between the aristocrats (elite), the middle class, or the magistrates. This arrangement made guaranteed no one faction held excessive power.
Notwithstanding these democratic components, the Roman Republic's aristocracy-dominated governance made it ultimately undemocratic. The Senate, which was predominately made up of nobles, held the majority of the republic's power. This indicated that very few people actually influenced the decisions that the government made. (National Geographic Society,

Open Document