ipl-logo

Roman Republic Research Paper

693 Words3 Pages

The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator. Finally, the civil war between Julius Caesar and Gnaeus Pompey ended …show more content…

They abused an oath known as sacrosanctitas, or the right of tribunes to not be physically harmed, to take control of Rome. With this oath in place, Tiberius bypassed the Senate and instead used the Plebian Assembly to issue land and farms to those without them. Both brothers ignored the tradition of tribunes being only elected once by announcing they will run for the next election, resulting in Tiberius being killed by angry senators. When Gaius tried to instate new courts to put senators on trial for political corruption, the senators advised the consuls to defend the republic by killing him. This ultimately resulted in two factions being created, the “supporters of the people” in the populares faction, or supporters of the “best” whom belonged to the optimates …show more content…

Using a “client army”, or hired mercenaries, he seized Rome’s highest offices and forced the Senate to support him. Notably, Sulla’s army consisted of commoners that did not own land or weapons. This ended up being crucial in Sulla’s capture of Rome, where his “officers except one deserted him … but his common soldiers followed him” (Hunt, 166). Sulla killed his opponents and anyone that dissented him, leading to the senate to become terrified of him. The senate, aiming to avoid execution, allowed Sulla to become a dictator, an act that was supposed to be only temporary, which gave him permanent immunity from prosecution. Sulla’s career revealed that war went from defending the republic to acquiring wealth and social

Show More
Related

  • The Biggest Problems In Simon Baker's Ancient Rome

    626 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simon Baker's Ancient Rome, Tiberius Gracchus realized that the Senate was not in the best interest of the people and therefore tried to address one of Rome's biggest problems by become tribune and give the people back there land. He appealed to the common people by promising that he would get back what was rightful there's. This lead to him being voted in as tribune, and from there the problems of Rome, attempted solutions, and obstacles he faced only spiraled him down faster. Tiberius was well loved by the people, but not so much by the Senate. Simon Baker's Ancient Rome says it best by saying "As Tiberius left the Senate House in disgrace, he received a very different reception from the Roman people" (86).

    Read More

  • Impact Of The Legacy Of Gracchi Brothers

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    For example, a bill introduced by Tiberius was without consultation with the Senate, which “was not illegal, but it violated a custom of long standing.” Furthermore, upon receiving a veto by fellow tribune Marcus Octavius, Tiberius had him removed from office with his power, which was unconstitutional. Such actions on his behalf led the Senate to fear his growing alleged tyrant power which eventually led to a revolt in which Tiberius and many of his followers were killed. Similarly, Gaius Gracchus was killed along with his supporters by his political foes as a result of his agrarian reforms that were accumulating a massive public following. These events portray one of the biggest aspects of the Gracchi legacy, which was violence as a means of political resolution.

    Read More

  • Septimius Severus Accomplishments

    807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Septimius Severus exemplified qualities that, by far, made him the greatest military emperor Rome had ever witnessed after coming to power in 193 CE. After decades of weak rulers that resulted in Roman vulnerability, Severus seized the position of emperor with the aim of returning Rome to its former glory. He was a man of the people, continually appeasing the Romans with numerous sacrifices and gladiatorial games. He even greatly represented the army through his countless military reforms and expeditions. Unfortunately, Severus was continuously undermined by a jealous Senate, who never understood the plans Severus had for the empire.

    Read More

  • Marius And Sulla During The Civil War

    371 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War erupts in 133 BC after the Punic Wars between the plebeians and the patricians was a period in history when rival generals collided. Marius and Sulla fought for command even after the Senate entrusted Sulla to command. Marius used violence to rescind the command given to Sulla. The back and forth power struggle between the two soon ended with Marius’s death and Sulla regained his dictating command of Rome. Sulla instituted terror that surpassed the violence dealt by Marius.

    Read More

  • Why Did Sulla Seal The Fate Of The Roman Republic

    934 Words  | 4 Pages

    with other individuals, such as Caesar, marking on Rome with an army less than 50 years later. Sulla’s military power and subsequent dictatorship broke many Republic traditions and the constitutional model, and in this way it can be interpreted that Sulla’s march on Rome did seal the fate of the Roman Republic. Additionally, Sulla’s use of violence during the 2nd Civil is also seen to deteriorate the traditions of the Roman Republic government and set another new precedent of conduct in Rome, with Paterculus citing Sulla had ‘carte blanche for unrestrained conduct in Rome’. (Velleius Paterculus 2.28) Sulla issued a series of proscriptions, a list of individuals that he deemed enemies of the state.

    Read More

  • Roman Republic Checks And Balances

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    Two consuls who were elected yearly and shared executive authority as well as the right to override one another's decisions were the foundation of the political structure of the Roman Republic. The richest and most powerful men in Rome made up the Senate, which worked alongside the consuls to advise them and approve the legislation. A popular assembly made up of citizens also existed in the Roman Republic, and it had the authority to elect officials and enact laws (The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2023). It was the goal of the power distribution among the consuls, Senate, and popular assembly to

    Read More

  • Cicero's Orations Of The Veerrines And In Catilinam

    148 Words  | 1 Pages

    Walter Spencer, an eminent classics professor at the University of Illinois, examines the use of conspiracy rhetoric in Cicero’s orations of the Verrines and In Catilinam. To portray Verres and his sociatas as a group of conspirators, Cicero separates Verres from the Roman republic by emphasizing his repeated repudiation of Roman authority, customs, and laws. Additionally, Cicero characterizes Verres’ comrades as criminal conspirators through the word choice manus and by describing their subversion of the republic. Spencer notes that Cicero convinces the jury that a vote for acquittal would facilitate the conspiracy. Cicero employs pathos to present Verres as a heinous menace to the Roman people.

    Read More

  • Marius And Sull The Fall Of The Roman Republic

    951 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many of the reliable valid sources that describe Marius and Sulla comes from the writings of Plutarch. He is a biographer and philosopher in his ancient Greek time, who was fortunate enough to experience and describe the downfall of the roman republic and key political figures in roman times. He will be the main source of evidence for these sources. I will also be further questioning the reliability of this source and if there is any case of him being biased towards one or another. Firstly I will discuss the lives of both Marius and Sulla briefly, then I will discuss the main differences between these two against each other and against other key political figures before their time in office.

    Read More

  • Caesar Vs Pompey

    157 Words  | 1 Pages

    When Pompey faced Caesar, Caesar refused, causing the two to begin a civil war which left Pompey dead. Caesar then was faced by an army led by Pompey’s sons, in which he defeated and returned to Rome to be met with a group of conspirators for his death on the ides of March. Among the

    Read More

  • Historical Events: Conflict Of Orders In The Roman Republic

    463 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Plebeians were protesting peacefully. Until the Conflict of Orders started the plebeians had little to no effect in the government of Roman Republic. The Plebeians were corrupt and their money was getting into their heads. ¨At first only Patricians were allowed to stand for election to political office, but over time these laws were revoked, and eventually all offices were opened to the Plebeians¨.

    Read More

  • Brutus Caesar Research Paper

    251 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is amazing to know at first that the Roman Republic was successful, and it expanded uncontrollably, and then the central power was distributed into many other men, so the republic turned into a tyranny. Of course, it is more than that as historiographically. So, I am

    Read More

  • Sulla's Influence On Julius Caesar

    1608 Words  | 7 Pages

    The fundamental basis for Sulla’s rise to power was his success in the military, through his military ability he was able to win various wars for Rome gaining him favour from the senate leading to his rise to power. Sulla showcased his military ability in the Mithraic war, the social war and the civil war. In the Mithraic war Sulla was sent by the senate to defeat the Mithridates as they had extended in the Roman province of Asia.

    Read More

  • How Did Sula Felix Contribute To The Rise Of Julius Caesar

    1932 Words  | 8 Pages

    Furthermore, Sulla’s perverted and arrogant character is revealed through his actions once he gained full power. According to Dowling's “The Clemency of Sulla”, Livy implied in his writings about Sulla that “the moment Sulla took control of Rome he lost every Republican virtue he possessed and was transformed into a tyrant, overwhelmed and distorted in his very nature by power beyond what any man should bear” (Dowling 328). From this, it reflected how he abused his position as dictator, even though he started with a lot of power and influence that could have contributed to the rise of Rome, but he let his arrogance get to him. From his influence in the senate as a leader of armies, he abused his power of dictator by creating proscriptions and reforming the government that led to the downfall of the

    Read More

  • The Roman Senate's Role In Roman Politics

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    As the politics in the Roman Empire began to shift around 50 B.C., Julius Caesar’s action of crossing the Rubicon, an act of war, tipped the Roman political situation. At this specific moment, Roman politics tipped in a whole new direction. Prior to this movement the Roman people were governed by a republic, meaning the Roman Senate had the majority of the power along with two consuls, similar to American Presidents, who served one-year terms. Caesar at the time was essentially a governor in Gaul, current day Spain, and disagreed with the Senates’ direction. The majority of the Roman Senate was made up of rich aristocrats, who were determined to further empower themselves and ignore the needs of the general public.

    Read More

  • What Is The Difference Between The Roman Republic And Julius Caesar

    300 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rome was different before Caesar came to control. The Roman Republic was, in theory, suppose to be ruled by the citizens of Rome. The citizens would elect representatives for the government to rule on their behalf. Aristocrats were known as patricians and the citizens were known as plebeians. The senate was made of patricians and they were the group of people to pick the consuls.

    Read More

More about Roman Republic Research Paper

Open Document