ipl-logo

Roman Values

921 Words4 Pages

Around this time Roman values were much different then they have been before. Citizens were supposed to support and give more loyalty to their state rather than their individual self. Honesty, integrity, and a low ambition were common values for citizens to follow especially since Rome was beginning to grow. This relationship between Rome and its citizens had already been established, however its lengths were really seen when its values were tested by Catiline. Everything he did was against the values that Rome held, which is why things ended so badly for him. The Roman state and its citizens had a relationship that required strong loyalty while also a decrease in ambition in order to balance Rome and its increasing growth. A Roman citizen owes a lot to Rome even if they aren’t always treated the same way back. …show more content…

Corruption unfortunately was a result of the growth and it became more prevalent in society, which is why it ended up being Rome’s downfall. All of which affecting the relationship the Romans had with their state. Crime and laziness were common occurrences, because there was such a big difference between the parties that arose during this time. The citizens that were poor had nowhere else to turn to but crime because things were getting so bad. This is obviously how Catiline was able to get so far in his plans because many felt as though the leadership of their state was failing them. For example, “ In a city so great and so corrupt Catiline found it a very easy matter to surround himself, as by a bodyguard, with troops of criminals and reprobates of every kind.” This just shows that even though citizens owed Rome loyalty and honesty it was just too corrupt that people had to turn on it. The strength of Rome's relationship with its citizens suffered leaving some of its not so great people to actually side with Catiline only hurting it

Show More
Related

  • How Far Did Tiberius Gracachus Influence The Government

    1226 Words  | 5 Pages

    Sallust, a highly regarded Roman historian, commented that “…fear of its enemies preserved the food morals of the state, but when the people were relived of this fear, the favourite vices of prosperity-licence and pride-appeared as a natural consequence”. This is corroborated by Florus, a criticized Roman historian and poet “The next hundred years were unhappy and deplorable because of internal calamities. The resources and wealth gained in our conquests spoiled the morals of the age and ruined the state, which was engulfed in its own vices as in a common sewer”. Both Sallust and Florus explain how Tiberius’ death caused the senate to resort to violence in order to keep their power. Consequently, the peace in Rome was disturbed and eventually led to the fall of Rome.

    Read More

  • Roman Empire Dbq

    345 Words  | 2 Pages

    WT Notebook Journal 2 During the period of the Early Empire, Roman expansion and change marked the end of the Roman Republic. Growth changed the ideal of the republic and new problems surfaced within Rome itself. Increase power in the Senate which led to a less democratic society and increase military power for the Greeks as well as civil wars between Rome and the provinces were some of the political changes that were prompted by Roman expansion. Socio-economical changes like high taxes due to the wars and movement towards cities, increase unemployment, and income disparity caused by the dispute between patricians and the plebeian were promoted by Roman expansion.

    Read More

  • Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    598 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is shown in the text where it says, “Under pressure on the two frontiers, the Romans started to squabble among themselves. Civilians distrusted their own armies and the soldiers distrusted some of their commanders- even the emperor to whom they had sworn allegiance.” (Document 3a). This shows that another reason that caused the Roman empire to fall was because of its people starting to distrust each other. When the people distrust each other, nothing in an empire can really be done

    Read More

  • Was Julius Caesar Actions Justified

    828 Words  | 4 Pages

    He did it all for the good of Rome. If he wouldn't have done any of this, Rome would've probably gone broke, or been taken over. If either of those things were to happen, Rome would've failed as a

    Read More

  • Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    617 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this essay the reason for Rome’s fall will be identified and why they caused Rome’s downfall. The primary reasons for the fall of Rome are military problems, untrustworthy government/injustice, and natural disasters/diseases. One of the reasons Rome fell is due to the fact Rome had multiple Military problems. According to Document B “because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it” (Doc B). Also according to Document B, “soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for chest and head and were often beaten by archers” (Doc B).

    Read More

  • Why Did Rome Fall

    543 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rome was a very powerful empire, but eventually fell because of one thing, weak political leadership. Weak political leadership was the main reason why Rome fell and it was more of a chain because when there is bad leadership then there is bad military and more invaders. The invasions got more effective and hurt the empire a lot more than it should have at that time. First of all Rome went from a republic to a empire with all the power and rights from the people slowly slipping away to the all powerful emperors at the end. Emperors did not want to share any power with the people which was very bad because they only paid attention to power, for example how Julius Caesar get kill/assassinated on March 15, 44 BCE in Rome, Italy.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Aeneid And Sallust's Conspiracy Of Catiline

    938 Words  | 4 Pages

    But Sallust tells of how Catiline acted against expectations and Roman nature by saying he: “scion of a noble family, had great vigour both of mind and body, but an evil and

    Read More

  • How Did Gracchi Brothers Law Contribute To The Downfall Of The Roman Republic?

    1808 Words  | 8 Pages

    Reasonable and noble concepts on the surface, however, were underlying with their own contempt for the Senate and optimate party. What could be seen on one side as an attempt to rectify a dangerous and debilitating social system was viewed on the other as nothing more than a power grab and a flagrant attack on the Republican institutional ideas of the time. The goal of the betterment of society as a whole was lost, and victory became the only objective. As ambition and personal motivation became the predominant theme of the Late Republic, the social fabric that long-held Rome together, against all odds, was being torn apart due to the reforms that were set in

    Read More

  • Roman Citizenship Dbq

    739 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a Roman citizen, your citizenship varied. Some Roman citizens were full citizens, others had limited rights. Examples of citizen rights would be the right to vote, hold government careers, and indulge in business. However, this varied depending on the citizen. The Roman Republic is further demonstrated by the fact that becoming a citizen and enjoying the privileges that go along with it were more of a privilege than a fundamental human right.

    Read More

  • How Did Julius Caesar Influence Roman Politics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    As Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon River on January 10, 49 B.C., he began to tip the Roman political direction. The transition from a republic, a form of government primarily run by the Senate, to an empire, a form of government presided over by a single person, began. The context of the political climate prior to the crossing of the Rubicon, Caesar’s ability to act as salesmen and a connector, and the stickiness of Caesar’s ideas all equally contributed to the dramatic change in Roman politics. The context of the political climate leading up to Caesar’s climactic move was beginning to decay in the sense of morals and public trust.

    Read More

  • Roman Empire Dbq

    729 Words  | 3 Pages

    People were not working. Everything was out of control; it was a free-for-all. Judges 21:25 accurately describes Rome at this time “All the people did whatever seemed right in their own eyes” (NLT). There was not enough people holding political power and the empire was becoming unmanageable. There were rebellions and surprise attacks.

    Read More

  • Athens Vs Rome Dbq Essay

    931 Words  | 4 Pages

    Romans were also not beasts for not participating in government unlike the Athenians who punished them. In document D it also states that they were “ ranked into distinct classes” which shows that they were put together and had their priorities straight. In document F it states “ senate had full governing power in Rome” which is better than in Athens where everyone kinda ruled, Rome was more of a democracy. This evidence all helps to show that Rome was better when it came to citizenship because they were more thought out and not all

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Julius Caesar

    1255 Words  | 6 Pages

    For starters, he is the reason the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Despite the rise of the empire was a relatively good geographical outcome, the fact that it was governed by a dictatorship, created a few problems. One being that most Romans were not in favor of a monarchical life. But, when he came into power the first thing that he did was make extreme cutbacks on the Senate. This can also be a result of his power thirst.

    Read More

  • Fall Of The Roman Republic Essay

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Roman Empire

    1645 Words  | 7 Pages

    This time would be difficult for citizens as Rome began to fall.  Expansion became the enemy of Rome because they couldn’t keep all of the cities in

    Read More

More about Roman Values

Open Document