How can a story as old as 1591 still be relevant today? Well the answer is movies and plays. There have been so many renditions of Romeo and Juliet, and most people have likely seen at least one rendition. The real question though is how do contemporary storytellers adapt a classic to reach a new audience? The answer to that question is that all of the movies are different. Most of the contemporary storytellers make their movies have at least one thing different in their movie. For example it's usually the setting, their actions, and the scenes. The first way in which the contemporary storytellers adapt their movie to reach a new audience is the setting.In the 1996 film by Baz Luhrmann they made the film very different from the book and …show more content…
For example act 2 scene 2 in the 2013 Broadway play of Romeo and Juliet they have a scene on the balcony where Juliet crawls across the balcony back to Romeo. In the book it tells us that she runs back to talk to Romeo, but in the Broadway play it shows her crawling across the floor of the balcony because the actor is trying to convey Juliet's emotions.The other reason she does that is to add some comedy to the act. Shakespeare intended the book to be a comedy and a tragedy. The Broadway play is trying to be as close to the book as they can but what was funny then isn't as funny now so they have to add some 20th century humor into the play. In Gnomeo and Juliet during act 3 scene 1 there is a fight scene but compared to the 1996 version it's very tame. It shows lawnmowers racing and that is the fight, but in the 1996 version there are guns involved and lots of deaths. During Gnomeo and Juliet it shows Tybalt cutting off the top of Benny's hat. This is because Gnomeo and Juliet is targeted to younger children which is how the storyteller intended it to be, so there has to be less violence. But in the little bit of violence Tybalt gets smashed into a brick wall. In the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet its targeted to older people so there is more violence in this movie of course. But in this fight scene Tybalt kills Mercutio just like the book and then Romeo kills
Tybalt kills an innocent man. A man whose only crime is defending his best friend. Finally, Tybalt starts a fight with Benvolio just because he is a Montague: “What, drawn and talk of peace! I hate the word, "As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee. Have at thee, coward!”.
Love is a concept not understood even by the greatest of philosophers. Every lyric, line, melody has some interconnection to the concept of love. Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare is a timeless classic about two young lovers from rival families in Verona, Italy, who choose to die rather than live without each other. Shakespeare's portrayal of Romeo and Juliet's love is complex and multi-layered, showcasing different aspects of love such as passion, and sacrifice. Despite the similarities between the ways Romeo and Juliet showcase love, they also have their own distinct differences making Romeo and Juliet such an intricate story.
Lord Capulet would rather Tybalt not make a scene in a public place in front of everyone that the family knows. Romeo is not causing
The parents have passed the hatred towards each other down to their kids causing street fights to occur. During Act lll Scene l, Tybalt challenged Romeo in a sword fight, because he went to the ball and Lord Capulet did not care. Romeo refused to fight because he was then married to Juliet, making Tybalt his family. Tybalt was looking for a fight, and Mercutio offered to fight instead of Romeo. Mercutio and Tybalt were fighting and Romeo stepped in the way causing Mercutio to get stabbed.
Imagine this: you are sitting in English class, and you do not understand how classic literature compares to modern day. There are multiple ways that “Romeo and Juliet,” written by William Shakespeare, could compare to 9/11. When comparing classic literature such as “Romeo and Juliet” to modern day tragedies like 9/11; there are many comparisons: somber, unity, and casualties. Notably, somber can be compared in both “Romeo and Juliet” and 9/11. Even though the somber was used in different ways.
Romeo and Juliet is a story about two young lovers whose relationship is forbidden by society. Throughout the play, William Shakespeare addresses the concept of whether the opinions of others should affect our choices or destinies. In the play, Romeo and Juliet choose to follow their hearts and disregard the opinions of their families and society. Their love for each other is so strong that they are willing to do whatever it takes to be together even if it meant going against the norms of society.
Blood boiled and his temper went up. Tybalt told Lord Capulet that he was going to beat up Romeo for crashing their party. Lord Capulet ordered him to relax and to leave Romeo alone. Romeo seemed to be a nice enough kid. Plus, Lord Capulet wisely told him that parties get ruined by opening brawls.
These ‘star-crossed lovers’ really fell for each other. These classic tragedies are well known for their own twist of love, featuring obstacles. Romeo and Juliet as well as Pyramus and Thisbe are both great works of literature that feature lovers that take their life for each other. Both stories have enemies, but they are not alike. Pyramus and Thisbe must overcome a beast, a lioness.
Romeo and Tony, the lead male characters from the play, Romeo and Juliet, and the film, West Side Story, are similar and different in many ways. Both are young men who fell in love with women from rival groups, and their love led to their tragic ends; however, they also possess different backgrounds and experiences that make them unique characters. In this essay, I will highlight the similarities and differences between the characters, and determine which was the more effective character. Between Romeo and Tony, it is evident that both are passionate, emotional, and deeply in love with their subjective lovers. Romeo is deeply in love with Juliet and is willing everything to be with her, even death, as he once said, my life were better “ended by their hate, than death prorogued, wanting of thy love,” (Act II
Paris and Romeo are shown as polar opposites in William Shakespeare's classic tragedy "Romeo and Juliet," each embodying a different set of goals and motivations. In spite of their rivalry for Juliet's devotion, the approaches, personalities, and fates of the two men emphasize their considerable differences. The play's actions and exchanges between Paris and Romeo are examined in order to highlight their different relationships and the characters' unique personalities. Paris and Romeo approach finding love in very different ways from the beginning.
The fight is overall similar in both versions, but the film is a lot more emotional. This change in plot was most likely made to bring more drama and emotion into the film, as a film is actually visual instead of needing to imagine the emotions through a
In the modern adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, Baz Luhrmann retained the integrity of the Shakespearean play. However, to amplify the irony of first love or love in general, Baz Luhrmann implemented influential scenes which would turn the view on Romeo and Juliet's love and enforced symbolism to imply the naivety of their love. The impulsive decisions and haste seen through the actions produced the frustration of mindless decisions. Romeo and Juliet first meet at the masque ballroom party, where their costumes reflect their internal character. The adaption of the costumes worn reflects their personalities and approach to love; Juliet, the angel.
The fight at the beginning of the play shows how much Tybalt hates peace. This is shown when he says to Benvolio, “peace? I hate the word / As I hate hell, all Montagues and thee”
no sir i don’t bite my thumb at you but i do bite my thumb.” From the very beginning of the book the montagues started dumb argument that started a massive fight for no reason. Then Tybalt of course showed up and started being an
In my U.S. History class, my teacher has an image of The Mona Lisa because there some history behind the picture. For example, who drew The Mona Lisa? Well, it was Leonardo da Vinci. Also, this portrait is one of the most famous portrait during the Renaissance. Back then wealthy people, like kings; nobles; etc., were able to afford the portrait, but now most people can afford it.