Ronald Reagan's Speech: Addressing The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster

This transition is crucial to connect two parts of the speech that are equally important. Imagine if Ronald Reagan only talked about the heartache prior to expressing his support to NASA, people might question his sincerity and become suspicious about his real intention. Here is a brief false speech of Ronald Reagan to show how lack of transition can destroy both purposes and both occasions associated with the

The first rhetorical skill that Reagan uses is ethos. In the very first sentence he implies his status and authority by stating, “I'd planned to speak to you tonight to report on the state of the Union, but the events of earlier today have led me to change those plans.” By showing us his power as President of the United States (the

The documents of the 1969 Apollo 11 mission that had landed the first humans to the moon have appeals to ethos, logos, and pathos and are effective in achieving its purpose. These documents were composed by different sources appealing to the audience and its use of ethos, logos, and pathos and how they each comply to make the documents potent to its purpose. Document 2 is a speech written for president Richard Nixon in case if there was a moon disaster. This speech was addressed to US citizens to notify them that the astronauts unfortunately could not make it back. Nixon appeals to pathos by using a strong sense of adjectives to describe their hard work they have done throughout this journey.

Throughout his speech, Ronald Reagan uses the ‘ingredients of persuasion’ to focus on the emotions of everyone listening, “Now I have used the words ‘they’ and ‘their’ in speaking of these heroes. I could say ‘you’ and ‘your’ because I’m addressing the heroes of whom I speak -- you, the citizens of this blessed land”.

So much in fact that we are now speaking to the children about the future, telling them that in order to have a future they must be brave, the American way. President Reagan appeals to several different emotions throughout the speech, he starts to wrap up the speech by telling a story, he tells a historical story of Sir Frances Drake and compares the astronauts that we have lost to him and his last exploration where he was killed doing the thing he loved. The speech is brought to a close with the biggest emotional appeal that Reagan uses all night, he uses a lingering tone when he recalls to the audience that the last time that we, or anyone ever saw these brave heroes was this morning, when they waved goodbye and “slipped the surly bonds of Earth to touch the face of God.” This was the last thing that he said and really left the country with a sense of sadness and loss, but even though we were sad and grieving, we had the

JBJ, much like FDR, would just give, give, give, without a second thought. Clinton, on the other hand, did not want to give out as much or as frequently. Correct Answer- B, Ronald Reagan. Both Clinton and Reagan wanted to cut back on the amount of welfare items being dished out. Reagan kept many welfare programs, but also decided that some had to go, such as affirmative action.

As he continues to address the loss faced by the nation, he also discusses how America will “continue to follow [the Challenger astronauts] into the future,” showing the American people that they will move forward from this

His final sentence is an allusion to his inaugural address, another point in which JFK creates an extra layer of attachment to his listener. The previously mentioned ‘alternate reality’ is used once again but primarily for pathos. He mentions the possibilities of the way that science could be advancing efficiency,“In short, at a time where we could be exploring how more efficiency (...) could be obtained,” he proposes and

Apollo 13 Reflection Paper Throughout the Apollo 13 clips, Gene Kranz’s character, demonstrated a great deal of leadership qualities. He exemplified the five leadership qualities outlined in the text, the Leadership Challenge: How to make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations (5th ed.) , Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z. (2012). Model the Way

This scenario is not at all difficult to conceive when you remember back to actual American history, when conspiracy theorists quite vocally kept the idea alive that the lunar landings of the late 60s and early 70s were faked. It was reasoned that the U.S. was feeling pressured to outdo Russia in every way during the Cold War era, but the NASA program lacked the funding (Fuller). Instigators of the Capricorn I deception, intended to manipulate public opinion for a program that, in their minds, was worthy of a large chunk of taxpayers’ dollars regardless of the program’s true performance (Capricorn). On the other hand, the plotters in Wag the Dog were never really under any allusion that they were acting for the greater good.

Adlai Stevenson offered the possibility of a rocket swap for the Jupiters in Turkey right off the bat (39). At last Khrushchev seems to have been affected by Robert Kennedy 's announcement that, in spite of the fact that there could be "No compensation" with the Turkey rockets under weight, it was normal that the United States would expel them after the emergency was more than (83). It is conceivable that offering this open door would have hurried the determination, yet far

He wanted to make sure that his home land was safe and secure. Reagan increased Nuclear Weapons. He authorized the Peace missile and the development of nuclear weapons. He improved our relations with the Soviet Union. “Cold War ended swiftly, nearly entirely peacefully.

“A Time For Choosing” is a historical speech not in light of its moving words or its suggestion to take action but because of a humble and influential man with the ability to fluently and eloquently speak to the American people with a stern honesty. Reagan’s speech was publicly reran multiple times. its value is still reflected on to this day to be one of the most effective speeches and is notable for redefining the conservative Republican party and a standout amongst the best every constructed to benefit a presidential candidate. Because this discourse was given with the motivation of convincing, instead of celebrating, or moving, there are relatively few illustrations or likenesses.

Regardless, when one dismembers the issue with great thought as to the yielded consequences of the nuclear bombings and complexities these outcomes and conceivable unmistakable decisions for utilizing said bombs, the line in the midst of truth and fiction starts to remove. Truman 's choice to employ the nuclear

Furthermore, one long-term impact of the Space Race is the improvement of foreign relations as joint efforts between the nations achieved far more with cooperation rather than competition. The Cold War was between two superpowers, both of which tried to compete with each other relying on their own nation’s resources, but in doing so they proved that both sides were capable of great feats. Therefore, when the war ended with a period of detente, the two nations teamed up in 1975 to launch the Apollo-Soyuz project, the first joint US- Soviet space mission. NASA astronauts in an Apollo Command and Service Module met Russian cosmonauts in a Soyuz capsule, but most notably a jointly designed docking module fulfilled the main mission, evidently showing that two different nations with different space-craft had the potential to both dock in orbit. Moreover, the mission itself allowed both sides to alter misconstrued perceptions of the others.