Rough Draft: Child Labor Essay “Saga estimated that as many as 20,000 families could be affected, since 70 percent of the local market relies on them for work” (page 5, paragraph 26). It is acceptable to purchase products made by children in factories of foreign countries under monitored conditions. Underage workers are required to produce products in factories. There has been a debate between many people of whether or not child labor should be condemned. However, “child labor” is a broad expression. Children in third world countries need the money from their jobs in the factory. “In other cultures, children are expected to work together with their parents. This happens not only with financial need, but also as part of the family’s work ethics” (Page 9, paragraph 49). Their version of childhood is different than how some of us may see it. They are used to working …show more content…
“...When the U.S. Congress threatened to ban the import of clothing made by children under 14 in Bangladesh, around 50,000 of them went from their jobs in the relatively clean textile factories to collecting garbage” (Page 8, paragraph 46.) The children, desperate for a job, need to work and so they don’t find a problem with working in factories. In fact, if they weren’t working in factories they would have to be out on the streets looking for work that they may not be guaranteed. People feel that children should not be working in factories due to the unsafe conditions. However, most children ages 14 and younger are safer in the factories then if they were not working. “There is no link to terrorist activity here, because everyone is involved in their work” (Page 7, paragraph 46). It is better for them to be inside the walls of the factory than to be mixed up with all the problems involving terrorism. If the children were not working in the factories and they had to find jobs on the street they would be more exposed to harm and
The textile factories were an unsafe and unheathly place for working class families to work. These factories were unsafe for children to work because the factories would over work the children,give them a insuffient diet and the factories were filled with diseases. For example a testimony from Joesph Hebergram to the Sadler committee he said; ‘i have damged lunges. my lgs muscles do not function properly and will not support the weight of my bones... the doctor told me that it was caused by dust in the factory,from being over worked and a insufficient diet.
The children make our shoes in shoe factories; they knit our stockings, out knitted underwear in the knitting factories. They spin and weave our cotton underwear in the cotton mills.” The members can say they do not support child labor, but Kelley practically retaliates by inferring that someone can say that and continue to support it by buying goods that were made by children instead of saving them from such unsafe working conditions that are not suitable for children. Those who do nothing are just as bad as the
In the speech about Child Labor by Florence Kelley, Kelley writes about several little girls working in mills. However, she reveals her horrible feelings about child labor. Kelley’s use of repetition, imagery, and the appeals to logos and pathos reveal how children should be freed from working long and harsh nights because they are not adults. No other gender or age group has increased as rapidly as underage girls in the workforce.
This fact is shocking and to Kelley, this is unacceptable and wrong. Kids at the age of thirteen should be concerned about their education and their friends, not work. By adding these statistics, Kelley proves to her audience that she is knowledgeable about the laws and procedures in other states. The reader is able to determine her credibility on the subject of child labor. Additionally, Kelley uses details to provoke sympathy from her audience when she communicates, “While we sleep at night, little white girls will be working tonight in the mills in those states, working eleven hours at night.”
The children will always be working there because without an education, they can’t really do anything else. Kelley uses her tone to show us how shameful some states should be when it comes to their child labor laws. Her sympathy can be heard through the speech when she talks about little girls staying up day and night to weave and sew the products. When she talks about New Jersey’s laws, she was disappointed because New Jersey lets the children work all night long with only a small amount of money.
However, in a way, she is telling the reader to think rationally and that there is no need for a case to be made - the factories are intrinsically evil. To support her article, Liebelson often cites statistics and uses numbers to aptly describe the nature of the situation. Most notably she cites the ages of the sumangali workers and statistics regarding money. She states that the girls can begin working as young as 13 and this number is repeated in different contexts multiple times to nail home the point of child labor. Making a child work all day long at such a young age, in an extremely dangerous environment to boot, paints a picture that Liebelson uses to her advantage.
The industrial revolution was a time of immense progress. It marked an era of technological advancements and a changing society, yet also a period smeared with unfair and unsafe working conditions. The history is filled with stories of people suffering, being injured, and even dying, all in the process of creating goods for the changing consumer culture. Thousands looked past the suffering, condoled themselves with the goods they purchased at economical prices all at the expense of the working class, a class that had no other choice than to work in the dark, dangerous factories to feed their family. While the consumer culture in this time could look past the anguish of those in the working class, progressives could not.
“Child labor and poverty are inevitably bound together and if you continue to use the labor of children as the treatment for the social disease of poverty, you will have both poverty and child labor to the end of time” (Grace Abbott). The issue of child labor has been around for centuries. Its standing in our world has been irrevocably stained in our history and unfortunately, our present. Many great minds have assessed this horrific issue and its effect on our homes, societies, and ultimately, our world.
About one hundred thousand workers from six hundred different mills were on strike there. The strikers wanted their work cut from sixty to fifty-five hours. About a sixth of the strikers were children under sixteen.” ( 5, Josephson). As a result, she gathered a large group of mill children and their parents, shaming the mill owners of their actions.
Child labor is something people in the United States might think of as awful, but for families in countries like China it is a way of life. Name brand companies, for example Nike, have their products made overseas often using children to do the work. The use of child labor in other countries for Nike brings up the debate on whether or not the United States should buy products that have been produced by children. The United States should not buy products manufactured with the use of child labor because of the unfair wages they get paid and bad working conditions. Some may argue that by putting children to work it is lowering the unemployment rates in countries, the morals of buying products produced by young teenagers is just flat out wrong.
This statement formulated by Kelley is an example of logos, due to the fact that it compels the audience to ponder about the calamitous effect that child labor is bearing by using statistical evidence. The purpose of using logos is to initiate her argument that child labor is permeating the country, especially in young girls, solidifying it by providing reasoning. This conveys to the audience that the author is well-aware of the situation regarding child labor, thus giving her credibility. In paragraph four, Kelley states, “North and South Carolina and Georgia place no restriction upon the work of children at night; and while we sleep little white girls will be working tonight
1. How do these testimonies present the realities of child labor? Give specific examples. The testimonies give us a brief snapshot of the condition in which children worked.
Child labor was a great concern in the Industrial revolution but very few people did something to stop it. Women and Children were forced to work more than 10 hours a day with only forty minutes to have lunch. Elizabeth Bentley once said that they didn’t have any time to have breakfast or drink anything during the day. They worked standing up and if they didn’t do their work on time they were strapped (whipped). Children were treating like they were not important, like they didn’t deserve a better life.
Earning money is an unavoidable necessity for them”(Faulmuller). This is showing that these children that are sent to work, are working to benefit their families and themselves in hopes of pulling each other out of the poverty hole. “For example, when the U.S. Congress threatened to ban the import of clothing made by children under 14 in Bangladesh, around 50.000 of them went from their jobs in the relatively clean textile factories to collecting garbage, breaking bricks, or even prostitution. Moreover, economic modelling research implies that in certain situations (where demand is
But not all work done by children should be accepted as child labor. In other words, if a work doesn’t harm child’s health or personal development (educational issues), it is generally accepted as something positive and useful. Such activities develop children’s skills, provide experience and formulate them to be part of society. The term “Child Labor” is when children do work that damages their health or hamper mental or physical