There is a lot of unnecessary rudeness going on in the world. There is a lot of rudeness advertise in the presidential debates. The presidential debates contain some much rudeness between the candidates. The way the candidates cut each other off while talking and talk about each other face to face makes it seem like the U.S. is perfectly fine with being rude. There should be no rudeness televised on National Television, especially between people who could possibly be the future president.
The perspective of this article is from the audience. Trump was seen as rude and very arrogant. In the Presidential debate, Donald Trump would not let Hillary Clinton talked her proper time. Hilary always got interrupted by Trump.
As the audience, a fear
…show more content…
They could all be work together to try to make the debates a little more controlled and professional by allowing all the candidates to corporate in a respectful and organized manner. That could be a common ground for the three different perspectives to come together. The presidential debate is something that is aired on national television, so monitoring that could be something to agree upon.
The fears of the three different perspectives could be from someone else winning. Candidates end up being rude because they want to make the other person look stupid, and they are afraid of losing. Be afraid to lose or being afraid of someone that someone do not want in office is common for all three. All the money and hard-work that candidates put in makes them even more competitive, so competitive that they will do anything to win. The rudeness they practice on national television is something that can leave an effect on the world.
Rudeness is not something that should be modeled by the United States. We should be practicing kindness to each other and promotes the values of life which make people happy. Presidential debates are not bad, but they should be monitored and should provide more restrictions. The U.S, as a whole, should not be viewed as something that is bad. In fact, the U.S should be known as the
Extra Credit: CNBC GOP Presidential Debate CNBC’s GOP Presidential Debate this year was held at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and the moderators focused their questions greatly on the economy, current national budget, tax reforms, immigration policies and their disagreements with the Democratic party. The Republican candidates that participated in this debate included Ohio governor John Kasich, former governor of Arkansas Mike Huckabee, former Florida governor Jeb Bush, Florida senator Marco Rubio, business man Donald Trump, retired surgeon Ben Carson, former HP CEO Carly Fiorina, Texas senator Ted Cruz, New Jersey governor Chris Christie, and Kentucky senator Rand Paul. With tensions growing between candidates and political parties, I feel that the moderators for this debate seemed to personally attack the candidates when questioning their reasoning behind their answers.
In the year of 2016, the most controversial issue that occurred was the presidential election. Hilary Clinton, a Democratic nominee and Donald Trump who is a part of the Republican Party, both fought for the spot to become the 45th president. Many felt that Donald Trump should not have been chosen to become president due to a stance on equality rights. Donald Trump does not believe in equality for genders and races and he makes it known on twitter. However, individuals presume Hilary Clinton is the better candidate because she has experience in the political field and has a devoted her time in reaching for justice.
America is arguably the greatest country in existence, it’s built on values of freedom and abundance of opportunities for its citizens. In Mr Schwartz’s view, the young “rude,” uncivil, and irresponsible have taken advantage of the freedom and created entropy in today’s society. I strongly disagree with Mr. Schwartz theories concerning the “rudeness” of American civility. Furthermore, Mr. Schwartz makes numerous generalizations, contradicts himself on countless remarks, and uses no data or evidence besides anecdotal evidence to support many of his claims. I disagree with Mr.schwartz's essay for several reasons.
In a time where every word counts, Donald Trump delivers a speech that eases the fears of many. While Trump’s speech appears informal and elementary, he displays expertise in the art of rhetoric. He employs the use of pathos, ethos, impeccable diction and mindful arrangement to grab the attention of the audience. As is evident from the public disturbances, Donald Trump is not favored by many Americans.
The American obsession with spectatorship is a phenomenon created by the inaccessibility of timely and relevant knowledge. This oddly leads to an increase in the demand and likeability of terror. In her piece “Great to Watch”, Maggie Nelson explores the origins of this fascination with horror and gives an
I believe that, yes it would have an adverse effect on a presidential election because the more debates a democratic party or republican party has means that the public and other party members have time to learn about the candidates and the issues that candidate supports. For example if a person like Donald trump which is on the republican party goes outside to a lot of debates and shows he’s not afraid he could outshine his competition in debates and even win more votes over the democratic party that has its main runner Hillary Clinton at a disadvantage with less debate time. Yes debates influence candidate selection during elations because the person decided who to vote for knows the side they want, and they know what that candidate thinks
With the introduction of social media and an increased access to technology, people are becoming more and more likely to let themselves delve into the great echo box of the internet where they have no obligation to be met with any other opposing opinion so they should choose. This is having the equally concerning effect where people are convincing themselves more and more that they are the moral champions of any political fight they should so choose to partake in. Both sides of the spectrum are guilty of this error and need to find ways to make meaningful dialogue or else the cultural barrier could become impenetrable. Unfortunately, this seems to becoming more and more likely as people declare themselves to be the sole proprietor of the moral high ground on any issue coupled with the fact that our President practically endorses violent dialogue in any conversation, it truly makes the hope of finding common ground in our country abysmal. Divisions are healthy and even necessary for a nation to survive, but when the divisions become too wide is there anything else to do but split?
Speeches have been a main staple of political rhetoric that goes has been America’s history. There have been memorable speeches from passionate citizens such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Sojourner Truth, and many speeches from our past presidents that have influenced America today. One such speech was given by President Bill Clinton when he addressed the American public on September 11 in 1998 to answer for a moral scandal that took place in the nation’s capital that involved himself and Monica Lewinsky, an intern working at the White House. When called to speak about the internal affair at the White house Clinton gave a memorable speech in which he used clever and strategic language to illicit certain feelings and actions from his unhappy crowd. His mastery of language and his understanding of the people he was speaking to comes through in one intentional speech.
This week’s lesson gave me more clarity on the-the Electoral College. It was confusing at first to hear that the popular vote does not win an election. Bush lost the popular votes, but won the electoral vote in 2000, cleared by the Supreme Court (POLS201). I think it is better for the candidate to worry about the crucial electoral votes than the popular votes.
Last of all, debates in the past have also helped us determine the next president because of how the candidate acts during the debates and how they respond to the questions. ’’During the second debate between President Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter … Ford botched a line about Soviet influence in Eastern Europe. “There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe,” said Ford … Ford’s answer was at complete odds with the reality of the Cold War.
Through out the years president have different point of views on the main subjects at hand in america. William McKinley being in the 19th century he was more focused on america being more involved in foreign country and industrializing america. George Bush and Bill Clinton were more focused on the next generation and equality for the people. George Bushes Speech was very passive and short in the since of length. He didn't make any bold statement and didn't have a set goal for america.
There’s a Golden rule in society that states “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Unfortunately, daily rudeness is on the rise, so much so there seems to be a revised Golden Rule: “Do unto others…whatever you think you can get away with.” According to the article in the Los Angeles Times by Anthony Russo, he explains to the Los Angeles readers that we are rude because “we are living in societies too big for our brains.” In his article he begins with a pathos appeal to present his argument, then briefly transitions to ethos to support his argument and, closes with logos as he discusses the resolve and its effects it could have on society.
that's what he’s doin’” (Lee 110). This quote shows that because Francis believes the opinion that he hears: he is taking his grandma’s opinion. Francis is niev and he doesn’t know what he is saying, so he doesn’t understand that it is rude. Disrespect can happen when someone doesn’t know a
My Responsibility to America In America, we are given freedoms and our basic human rights. To make sure these freedoms such as free speech are kept, we as Americans have responsibilities to America. Whether it be in our everyday lives serving in our community or special occasions when serving on a jury, Americans are held to these responsibilities to keep the United States to the standard that it always is. Our basic responsibilities are to pay taxes and vote in elections, however, they extend far greater than those.
The story of Animal Farm Why are people are rude to others? All people are equal there shouldn't be other people making less to others. Everyone should respect how they are and not making them feel different than others around them. Everyone should feel free to be how they are and not feeling bad of who they are and stop having enemies.