Ruth Benedict A Defense Of Ethical Relativism
R01365382
Ethical Relativism is the belief that what is morally right and wrong varies from culture to culture, or even from person to person. Ruth Benedict writes, “A Defense of Ethical Relativism”, in which she presents data she has collected to defend ethical relativism. In contrast, Louis Pojman writes, “A Critique of Ethical Relativism”, in which he presents various problems with ethical relativism. Ethical relativism is not a good way of deciding between what is morally right and what is morally wrong.
In, “A Defense of Ethical Relativism”, Ruth Benedict presents data that she has collected about different cultures around the world. Benedict goes on to explain that what we believe is morally right or wrong in our culture may be completely
…show more content…
“No one civilization can possibly utilize in its mores the whole potential range of human behavior.” (Pg. 41) Benedict makes it clear throughout her writings that she believes that one society is not able to decide what is morally right or wrong for another society. Benedict believes that every society is built upon its own morals and values, so for one society to say what another society is doing is wrong is irrelevant because that society has its own set of values in which it follows. However, Louis Pojman would disagree with this …show more content…
Pojman uses Ted Bundy as an example of how this idea is extremely problematic. If one were to follow subjectivism, then they morally could not tell Ted Bundy what he was doing is wrong because in his own morale code it is morally right to commit the crimes that he committed. Conventionalism is, “the view that there are no objective moral principles but that all valid moral principles are justified (or are made true) by virtue of their cultural acceptance, recognizes the social nature of morality.” (Pg. 46) Pojman explains how this is also problematic because if one were to follow this idea, then reformers such as Martin Luther King Jr and even Jesus were immoral because they did not accept the morals that were set by
Peter Boghossian's Argument 'No Halfway House'
972 Words | 4 PagesThey maintain that moral codes and principles are shaped by social, historical, and cultural factors and that what they consider right or wrong, good or bad, can vary greatly between different societies and individuals. According to moral relativists, there is no single, universal moral system that applies to all people, and that moral claims are not based on facts but on cultural and personal opinions. They argue that moral relativism allows for greater tolerance and respect for cultural diversity, as it recognizes that different societies have different moral codes and that there is no one right way of doing things. However, critics argue that moral relativism leads to a lack of moral direction and clarity and
Disagreement: Evaluative Diversity And Moral Realism
1377 Words | 6 PagesThis paper will attempt to summarize and explain the essay How to Argue about Disagreement: Evaluative Diversity and Moral Realism by John M. Doris and Alexandra Plakias. They claim that moral realism has a problem with its assertion that all disagreement is superficial, and would not persist under ideal conditions. They cite an experiment by Nisbett and Cohen in 1996 where there seems to be a fundamental disagreement between northern and southern white American men surrounding acceptable violence. Moral realism is the philosophical idea that morality is based in objective fact.
Cultural Relativism Vs Female Circumcision
102 Words | 1 PagesOur moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.
Moral Relativism Mary Midgley Analysis
424 Words | 2 PagesMoral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.
Moral Relativism Analysis
1284 Words | 6 PagesThere can be no common framework to resolve moral disputes or to reach agreement on ethical issues among members of different companies. Moral relativism is attractive to many philosophers and sociologists, because it seems to offer the best explanation of the variability of moral belief. It also offers a plausible way to explain how ethics is part of the world as described by modern science. Although the natural world is ultimately composed of nothing, say the relativistic ethics always has a basis in human feelings.
James Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative
1070 Words | 5 PagesIn this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.
The Southern Poverty Law Divine Command Theory
1103 Words | 5 PagesAccording to Ethical Relativism, there are no universal truths, which apply to all human beings at all times, and proposes that moral principles should be viewed as "local, conventional, subjective and self-justified" (Yardley, 2012). While ethical principles should conform to social, cultural norms and moral beliefs and practices are frequently products of cultural upbringing, the basis for Ethical Relativism is fundamentally unsound because it can be used to justify and rationalize practices and behaviors that are inherently immoral, such as racism, discrimination, hate crimes and oppression. Ethical African
Cultural Differences Argument For Moral Relativism
1178 Words | 5 Pages”(p.19) This shows that in the study of ethics, the study of moral relativism to be more specific, the idea of universal truth does not exist. That is to say what is perceived as “good” or “right” can vary form culture to culture, so there is no way to have one universal truth. Two major examples of cultural differences that are often cited in Support
Rachels And Benedict's Views On Morality
198 Words | 1 PagesAccording to benedict morality depends on each culture behavior, and how society mold
Moral Relativism In Criminal Justice
709 Words | 3 PagesThis is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can
Arguments Against Cultural Relativism
1020 Words | 5 PagesEvery society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.
Non Relative Approach To Virtue Ethics
1889 Words | 8 PagesWriters like Alasdair MacIntyre, Bernard Williams and Philippa Foot have abandoned “the project of rationally justifying a single norm of flourishing life for and to all human beings.” They deny that ethics can have trans-cultural norms
Cultural Relativism In Social Media
2321 Words | 10 PagesIn other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.
Ethics In Criminal Justice Essay
958 Words | 4 PagesNormative ethics is crucial in decision-making in the criminal justice system and it is based on the notion that one should act morally using reason to determine the suitable way of conduct of self. Ethical relativism is part of normative ethics and it argues that what is morally right or wrong varies in a great deal from one person to another. The standards of conduct and methods of doing things differ from one society to another and there can never be a single standard of conduct for all societies; we must make ethical decisions therefore based on each situation. Relativism requires that we judge an individual who acted immorally by the standards of his culture and not our own (Cook, 1999). It is effective in just
Ethical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay
2607 Words | 11 PagesThe Strength and Vulnerability of Different Moral Views Over centuries of fervent discussion in the moral world, there is still nothing like a consensus on a set of moral views. This essay attempts to outline and critically evaluate two moral views, namely ethical objectivism and cultural relativism. It is crucial to understand that both moral theories cannot be true at the same time as it results in contradictions, contributing to false beliefs. Additionally, it is essential that we discuss these issues with an open-mind so as to gain deeper insights from them. First and foremost, we will be looking at the prominent view of ethical objectivism.
More about Ruth Benedict A Defense Of Ethical Relativism
Peter Boghossian's Argument 'No Halfway House'
972 Words | 4 PagesDisagreement: Evaluative Diversity And Moral Realism
1377 Words | 6 PagesCultural Relativism Vs Female Circumcision
102 Words | 1 PagesMoral Relativism Mary Midgley Analysis
424 Words | 2 PagesMoral Relativism Analysis
1284 Words | 6 PagesJames Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative
1070 Words | 5 PagesThe Southern Poverty Law Divine Command Theory
1103 Words | 5 PagesCultural Differences Argument For Moral Relativism
1178 Words | 5 PagesRachels And Benedict's Views On Morality
198 Words | 1 PagesMoral Relativism In Criminal Justice
709 Words | 3 PagesArguments Against Cultural Relativism
1020 Words | 5 PagesNon Relative Approach To Virtue Ethics
1889 Words | 8 PagesCultural Relativism In Social Media
2321 Words | 10 PagesEthics In Criminal Justice Essay
958 Words | 4 PagesEthical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay
2607 Words | 11 Pages