Ryan Howard Case Study
(2) Cross Examination
The defense can challenge Kendal Malone’s findings of the tire tracks behind Balmen’s house by showing how they only establish that Bratton’s vehicle was present at the scene at some point. They do not determine if the tracks were made at the time of the murder, and they only establish that the vehicle was at the scene, not Bratton. The defense should also ask why no footprints were found in the dirt. Finding footprints would confirm that someone actually got out of the car. This can help the defense by convincing jurors that it is not clear if Bratton was present at the time of the murder, and if he did pass by Balmen’s house, he never got out of the car because there were no footprints. The defense should also challenge the findings of the microphone cord and gloves. They can show how many other people in Hollyville own the exact same microphone cords. They can say that it is possible that someone else who may have wanted to harm Balmen may have had the exact same microphone cord and may have used it to kill Balmen. The defense can show
…show more content…
This would be helpful in showing how he also despised Balmen for ruining his business. The defense can ask Howard about how he also owns the same exact microphone cord as Bratton. This may create suspicion in jurors that Howard, whose business was destroyed by Balmen’s review, had the microphone cord which may have been used to kill Balmen. The defense can also point out how Balmen’s review created a bigger dent in Howard’s life than it did in Bratton’s. Potential buyers of Howards’ club turned away and Howard experienced a significant loss of revenue due to Balmen’s review. The defense should present to jurors the possibility that Ryan Howard may have killed Balmen to support their theory that many people had been harmed by Balmen’s reviews and any of them could have killed
Mr. Stevens Wasn T Foolproof
670 Words | 3 PagesThe state's most compelling evidence is that of the coat, they found evidence of Mr. Rodgers DNA on the bottom of the coat. The problem with this is that the defense proved the point that if he had murdered Mr. Rodgers, then blood would have been all over the jacket, which there wasn’t. Equally important to point out is that they should have searched for shoes, and pants when they scoured his house. Considering they both should have had blood residue or particulates on them. They stated that he could have taken the jacket off, but it’s a suspicion.
Pros And Cons Of Wayne Williams
170 Words | 1 PagesIt is another form of evidence to help solidify and crack down the killer. The defense could have put more emphasis on the statement that William’s parents knew his son was home and that they had the vehicle and maybe that could cause more of the idea of him being framed. If I was a juror I know that Williams reaction in the courtroom would set me on
Wayne Williams Fiber Evidence Essay
629 Words | 3 PagesThe fiber evidence presented in this case was so overwhelming and simply was the driving force leading to Wayne Williams conviction. I do not believe the prosecution would have been able to obtain the same results without it. The credibility of the FBI forensics investigators and their reputable crime lab made for excellent testimony concerning the fiber evidence at trail, which the defense was simply ill prepared to counter attack its merits (The Atlanta, n.d.). Other evidence was presented in this case, and much of this evidence while certainly impactful on the case and to members of the jury, this evidence alone without the fiber evidence would surely not have held up to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
Case Study Brent Small Case
79 Words | 1 PagesIn regards to the Brent Small case, I personally believe that Mr. Smalls shouldn't be found guilty due to the lack of evidence. Although there was a witness who saw what happened, the evidence isn’t consistent with the case. The vehicle did match the description but the witness was unsure of the license plate and the damage to the vehicle isn’t significant to the crime committed. I don't believe that the evidence is strong enough to convict Mr. Smalls.
Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesBoth men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite
Murder On A Sunday Morning Analysis
681 Words | 3 PagesAs you are shown in the film, after the identification of Brenton Butler and his so-called testimony to investigators, the police and prosecutors just stopped working on the case. Thus, evidence that would have supported Butler’s innocence and help find the actual killer weren’t discovered until Brenton’s defense attorney, Pat McGuinness did some investigation and research of his own. Thus, flowing from film from the trial to McGuinness’s investigation scenes shows the how he attained the information that he and his partner could present in the courtroom. While the prosecutors only had the one eyewitness, who claimed to have only caught a glimpse of the shooter and gave description that did not even match Butler. The film presents the conclusion that the police did not actually do the work to find the actual killer and if it wasn’t for Pat McGuinness and his partner wanting to find the culprit, it would never actually be solved.
Ethos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 PagesWhat if juror 8 did not have the courage to freely state his opinion? The innocent boy would be dead for doing absolutely nothing.
Ethos Pathos In 12 Angry Men
997 Words | 4 PagesJuror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the old man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the old man “[ran ] to his door and [saw ] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the old man could not have done that because of his stroke.
Prejudice In 12 Angry Men
518 Words | 3 PagesNot seeing the case through the given facts, this juror just rants about how the background of the boy provides sufficient reasons for him to die. The astonishing scene is when, upon hearing the real reasons behind his
Evidence In 12 Angry Men
488 Words | 2 PagesAnother piece of evidence is a woman who swears to have seen the young man stabbed the father through the last two windows of the train. The evidence says that she was asleep and when she woke up and turned to the window through the last two windows of the train, she was able to see how the young man stabbed his father. The only problem with this argument is that the woman wore bifocal glasses and nobody usually sleeps with glasses so it would be very difficult that without their lenses of such magnitude could see what actually
12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesMany of the jurors use logos, logic and reasoning, to lay out the evidence in a rational and concrete manner to convince him. An example is when 4th Juror lays out all of the evidence of the knife to convince 8th Juror with seven, linear, factual points. The reader and audience is meant to connect a sense of ethos, reliability or competence, to 8th Juror, as he is the only one who doesn’t, at first, seem to be clouded by ignorance, racism, disinterest, or any other characteristic that might cloud
How Is Fallacies Used In 12 Angry Men
1783 Words | 8 Pages12 Angry Men Essay The movie 12 Angry Men, is about a son who may have committed murder, killing his father, and 12 jurors have to either prove him innocent or guilty. There are jurors who are fixed on saying that the 19 year old boy is guilty of murdering his father, but there are other jurors who are saying he is innocent until they have proof to say that he is guilty. There are many instances when the jurors use fallacies, deductive reasoning, and inductive reasoning when they are trying to prove either that the boy is guilty or innocent.
Kurt Warner Case Study
653 Words | 3 Pages1) Kurt Warner is definitely a competent manager. He has an extraordinary capacity to make the others around him succeed. Larry Fitzgerald makes a point of describing how Warner was able to adjust his style to each individual player in order to get the most out of him. Fitzgerald continues to describe how warner worked with him as an individual, being tough and forceful to draw out the best of his receiver. Warner also had the ability to build teams.
12 Angry Men Juror 8 Analysis
1451 Words | 6 Pagessupposedly exclaimed by the boy towards his father was enough for the him to make his decision. This man was shown to be short tempered throughout the play. As more jurors began taking into account the evidence and proving the accused innocence, juror 3 became louder and far more boisterous. He wouldn’t even let the summer heat halt his anger, anger which soon consumed him and brought out the hypocrisy of his claim by hissing through his teeth to another juror, “Let me go. I’ll kill him.
12 Angry Men Case Study
858 Words | 4 PagesIn a New York City, an 18-year-old male from a slum is on a trial claiming that he is responsible for his father death by stabbing him After both sides has finished their closing argument in the trial, the judge asks the jury to decide whether the boy is guilty or not The judge informs the jury decided the boy is guilty, he will face a death sentence as a result of this trial The jurors went into the private room to discuss about this case. At the first vote, all jurors vote guilty apart from Juror 8 (Henry Fonda), he was the only one who voted “Note Guilty” Juror 8 told other jurors that they should discuss about this case before they put a boy into a death sentence
More about Ryan Howard Case Study
Mr. Stevens Wasn T Foolproof
670 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of Wayne Williams
170 Words | 1 PagesWayne Williams Fiber Evidence Essay
629 Words | 3 PagesCase Study Brent Small Case
79 Words | 1 PagesRacial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case
852 Words | 4 PagesMurder On A Sunday Morning Analysis
681 Words | 3 PagesEthos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 PagesEthos Pathos In 12 Angry Men
997 Words | 4 PagesPrejudice In 12 Angry Men
518 Words | 3 PagesEvidence In 12 Angry Men
488 Words | 2 Pages12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesHow Is Fallacies Used In 12 Angry Men
1783 Words | 8 PagesKurt Warner Case Study
653 Words | 3 Pages12 Angry Men Juror 8 Analysis
1451 Words | 6 Pages12 Angry Men Case Study
858 Words | 4 Pages